DVD Review: Alice in Wonderland (BBC, 1966)

Imagine Ingmar Bergman dropping hallucinogens then stopping by the local insane asylum to direct an all-inmate, gothic version of Alice in Wonderland. You can’t? Then run to your local video outlet and rent, buy, or…whatever…BBC’s 1966 Alice in Wonderland.

Director Jonathan Miller’s made-for-television adaptation is an ageless, surreal vision. Filmed in black and white, Alice in Wonderland is faithful to the source material. There is an assumption that the viewer is familiar with the original work; animal characters are played by actors in Victorian dress, not animal costumes, and it’s up to us to know who they are when Alice encounters them. As for the actors—what a cast! Michael Redgrave as the Caterpillar, Peter Cook as the Mad Hatter, Michael Gough as the March Hare, Peter Sellers as the King of Hearts, Malcolm Muggeridge as the Gryphon, and John Gielgud as the Mock Turtle—could we ask for more? Let's do and get Leo McKern as the Duchess, an unexpected and delightful performance. Anne-Marie Mallik, a young actress who apparently never again acted, stars as Alice. Best of all, the Cheshire Cat is played by—are you ready for this?—a cat!

This Alice is sometimes grim, often impudent. She is not a wide-eyed innocent, but a sarcastic, disrespectful observer of a world that she finds wearisome. There are scenes where she seems nearly schizophrenic, others where she does not speak but her thoughts are telegraphed to the audience. At times she reacts directly to the camera, as though she were turning to the viewer. There may be far too many long, lingering shots of Alice staring off into the distance, but they define an Alice at odds with her surroundings.

I am repeatedly tempted to use the term “dreamlike” to describe various aspects of this production, but that would be redundant, since Alice in Wonderland is about a dream. It does, however, reinforce that this is, indeed, a faithful adaptation. The look and feel of it is like no Alice I’ve ever experienced, a testimony to Miller’s inventiveness. It is dark and it is much more for adults than for children.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for miss-bob-etier

Article Author: Miss Bob Etier

Like most freelance writers, there is something about her that isn't quite right. Read her stuff and find out what.

Want to contact bob? Try bob.etier@gmail.com

Visit Miss Bob Etier's author pageMiss Bob Etier's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - El Bicho

    Feb 25, 2010 at 2:27 am

    Not sure why you think Burton is going to "deliver a stunning adaptation." He has had more misses than hits the past decade and the early buzz is not good.

  • 2 - Miss Bob Etier

    Feb 25, 2010 at 8:07 am

    El Bicho, I HATED "Sweeney Todd," but I think "stunning" describes it well.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.