Cameron Diaz and Her Breasts Vindicated

Ending a battle over rights to a series of photos — some of them topless — that Cameron Diaz, now 33, posed for when she was an unknown model of 19, last week the lanky blonde movie star won undisclosed damages from Los Angeles photographer John Rutter, 42, for unauthorized commercial use of her name and image.

Superior Court Judge Valerie Baker also dismissed a countersuit filed against the Charlie's Angels, Something About Mary, Being John Malkovich, Shrek star by Rutter.

rutter Severely limiting Rutter's ability to raise funds is the fact that he was sentenced to nearly four years in prison last September for the scheme to blackmail Diaz with the bondage-themed photos. He was convicted of perjury, attempted grand theft, forging Diaz's signature on a 1992 release form and telling the actress that he would publish the topless photos unless she paid him $3.5 million.

camerondiaztopless Diaz spokesman Brad Cafarelli announced yesterday, "Ms. Diaz obtained a summary judgment against Mr. Rutter for unauthorized commercial use of her name and likeness as well as statutory damages and there is now a permanent injunction in place prohibiting the sale, license or other use of the materials including both the photographs and the videotape in question."

A hearing is pending on whether Rutter should pay Diaz's legal fees for the civil case, which were listed in court documents as totalling $650,000.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and publisher of Blogcritics.org, which, quite frankly, rules - as do his wife and four children.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Bliffle

    Apr 06, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    Are Ms. Diaz' breasts that desirable, that fascinating?

  • 2 - Dawn

    Apr 06, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    They don't appear to be that voluminous, that's for sure.

  • 3 - Christopher Rose

    Apr 06, 2006 at 1:46 pm

    Bliffle: Oh yes.

    Dawn: As you ladies sometimes like to say, it ain't the meat it's the motion!

  • 4 - Andy Marsh

    Apr 06, 2006 at 1:47 pm

    I need a closer look....maybe a taste....

  • 5 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2006 at 3:11 pm

    they aren't uninteresting: shape and perkiness are factors commensurate to size, I always say

  • 6 - Joe

    Apr 06, 2006 at 6:16 pm

    My gf is hotter and has big boobs than that, lol

  • 7 - Eric Olsen

    Apr 06, 2006 at 6:24 pm

    yes, but would a mag pay $5 mill for them?

  • 8 - Shawn

    Jun 05, 2006 at 3:40 pm

    Cameron Diaz is unbelievable. I'd love to get a closer look at those pictures.

  • 9 - Eric Olsen

    Jun 05, 2006 at 3:50 pm

    you can find many of them pretty easily by doing an image search on Google or wherever, but you didn't hear it here

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 12, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs