Blu-ray Review: The Illusionist (2006)

Part of: Features From The Blu Lagoon

The Illusionist is a very engaging film as it unfolds, but as time is spent away reflecting upon the story, it doesn't hold up once the trick has been revealed, like most illusions.

Set in 19th century Vienna, Austria, Eisenheim the Illusionist (Edward Norton) is arrested by Inspector Uhl (Paul Giamatti) during a performance, where he appears to be conjuring ghosts, for threats against the Empire and disturbing public order. The crowd is angered.

Uhl reports to Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell) about Eisenheim and the majority of the film becomes a flashback. As a young boy (Aaron Johnson) Eisenheim meets an elderly man who performs tricks and this is where it is alleged his interest in magic began. He also makes the acquaintance of Sophie, an upper-class girl whose family isn't happy about her cavorting with the son of a cabinetmaker.

The story jumps forward 15 years as Eisenheim the Illusionist brings his act to Vienna. He astounds audiences with his illusions, including Uhl, who informs Eisenheim he is an amateur magician himself. Prince Leopold attends a performance and when Eisenheim asks for a volunteer, Leopold encourages his fiancée, who turns out to be Sophie (Jessica Biel). They later have a clandestine meeting in a carriage, but are unable to escape the notice of Uhl's men. Eisenheim is invited to conduct a command performance and shows up the prince in front of his guests. Sophie wants to be with Eisenheim but escaping the prince will be tough. He's a powerful man, possibly next in line to be emperor, and Uhl and his men are vigilant.

What's happens during the remainder of the story is captivating as it plays out, and revealing it would ruin a number of surprises for viewers, but once the conclusion is reached, it turns out a good portion of it is unnecessary. The motivations of some characters and their natures come into question, which doesn’t seem to be what the film is about.

I want to revisit The Illusionist with the full knowledge of the story to see what my reaction will be. Luckily, there is so much done right. The performances are very good. The cinematography of Dick Pope is marvelous. I particularly love how the look of the flashbacks evokes old movies with a flicker around the frame edges and hints of sepia. Their production team does a great job evoking the time. Philip Glass delivers a very good soundtrack that is worth owning on its own.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for el-bicho

Article Author: El Bicho

El Bicho writes for a number of movie web sites, including Cinema Sentries, which he runs for the geniuses of Forwerd Media. He also occasionally cleans up around here. Follow at twitter.com/ElBicho_CS

Visit El Bicho's author pageEl Bicho's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - the real bob

    Jul 19, 2010 at 11:51 am

    Did you actually watch the entire film?

  • 2 - El Bicho

    Jul 19, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    Yes. Not sure if you read the review, but doesn't the phrase "once the conclusion is reached, it turns out a good portion of [the story] is unnecessary" indicate that? I didn't want to get specific because it would spoil the film. I also watched the extras.

    Is there something in the review that makes you think otherwise or are you projecting?

  • 3 - Jeff Forsythe

    Jul 19, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    A good review however I would have added a "spoiler alert" and scribed a few additional paragraphs on what wasn't covered here.

    Mr. Forsythe

  • 4 - El Bicho

    Jul 19, 2010 at 4:37 pm

    Thanks, Jeff, but it didn't seem necessary to give away what I thought didn't work since it's a major part of the movie

  • 5 - the real bob

    Jul 19, 2010 at 5:28 pm

    I didn't expect spoilers; it doesn't sound like you saw the same movie so many others saw. As for projecting...no, I intend to direct.

  • 6 - El Bicho

    Jul 19, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    "Not watching the entire film" and "perceiving it differently" are two very different things. I'll certainly cop to the latter as I don't expect anyone to see a film the same way I do. Don't even know if they can actually.

    I am not sure who the "many others" are and it wouldn't change my opinion anyway, but over at the IMDb forum there are a few people who agree with me and had similar issues. Although some of the people trying to debunk it are trying too hard and missing some obvious answer to their questions.

    From your statements I am assuming you've seen it, and since people should read the article first, I don't have any qualms about spoiling anything in the comments.

    Everything after Sophie's death was unnecessary. As intriguing as it was, if Eisenheim had left town or the country after that, he would have ended up in the same place, so why bother? In fact he actually put himself at risk.

    I take it you disagree?

  • 7 - the real bob

    Jul 19, 2010 at 6:50 pm

    Not necessarily.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs