A nadir was reached when the “style expert” in the sky box sniffed that Jodi Foster simply was not looking sexy enough to pull off the gown she was wearing. (Jodi looked conservatively stylish as usual). It sounded shallow and catty when he said it, but the true depth of his callowness was revealed later in the evening when Foster appeared to present the “In Memoriam” segment, in part to pay tribute to her best friend who had died two weeks earlier. Yeah, sorry the classy actress in mourning failed to bring her sexy back, you twit.
Next year ABC would do well to make whatever trade is necessary to get Tim Gunn to do their red carpet coverage. Lost… Ugly Betty… whatever sacrifices it takes to get Uncle Tim on the red carpet.
Most of my Oscar disappointments occurred when the nominees were announced. You can see my take on who oughta been there instead here, but it meant that for the most part, there were no glorious high or crushing low moments to be had during the ceremony itself.
The only one that really surprised me was the Best Foreign Language Award to The Lives of Others over Pan’s Labyrinth. With all the hoopla over the Mexican cinema renaissance and the new “Three Amigos”, Guillermo Del Toro, Alejandro Inarritu, and Alfonso Cuaron, I was shocked and disappointed that none of them walked away with a major prize. Any mystery over The Lives of Others’ victory was instantly banished during the director’s acceptance speech, however. In accent-less English, Von Donnersmarck cheerfully thanked Arnold Schwarzenegger for all his wonderful advice.
Wow, so no politics involved in the Academy’s decision there. Let’s see, should we vote for the cheeky Mexican or Arnie’s buddy? Arnie’s buddy or the cheeky Mexican? Gosh and golly. Let me ponder that over a few rounds of golf at the club.
The ceremony itself opened with a nice moment when Ellen DeGeneres asked all the nominees to stand. Will Smith gave Kate Winslet a big hug. Helen Mirren crossed the aisle to shake Martin Scorsese’s hand. Mark Wahlberg stood there applauding himself with a smug look on his face. Hell, why shouldn’t he be smug? He clearly used some incriminating evidence against the entire Hollywood acting community to get himself nominated. Then he managed to score the Academy’s cat bird seat, right behind Martin Scorsese, so he managed to get himself in approximately 74% of the evening’s audience shots.







Article comments
1 - Victor Lana
Very nice review of the general proceedings. I just wonder how the Academy can give a sympathy vote to Alan Arkin and ignore Peter O'Toole. Any ideas?
As for Scorcese, I knew he won as soon as I saw the presenters. It's like welcome to the club club. Or something like that.
Live long and prosper!
2 - Mary K. Williams
Good write up. I pretty much agree, except I thought Ellen did fine, and I didn't mind the tumblers.
Whatever pre-show I saw was pretty bad. I think it was the ABC one, and it was definitely cringe inducing.
3 - Catherine
I caught none of the pre-show, and only some of the Oscars. But I did see the truly awful E! show as a repeat the next day. I would be embarrassed if my name were associated with that debacle in any way, shape or form. The entire show was worse than Bjork's infamous swan dress.
On the other side of the balance scale, I caught Tim Gunn's commentary on the Today show. As always, he was well-spoken and a delight to listen to (even if our taste differs, lol). I have utterly forgotten the actress, but it was a kick to have her interrupt his admiring comments to gush all over him and show her relief over his approval.
And maybe because it's something I'll never be able to do at this stage of my life, but I thought the tumblers in silhouette were fascinating!