Today on Blogcritics
Home » Under a Green Skin: Wicked by Gregory Maguire

Under a Green Skin: Wicked by Gregory Maguire

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

“History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.”
&#8212Sir Winston Churchill

L. Frank Baum’s classic “history” of the Land of Oz was most unkind to the Wicked Witch of the West and her sister; the novel showed Dorothy Gale as an innocent gently tricked by the Wizard and by Glinda the Good. But what if this is a biased story? Isn’t it fair to give the Witch a chance to set us straight?

Gregory Maguire’s ground-breaking novel, Wicked, does just that. The Witch who tormented Dorothy and her friends was once an infant, born with a green skin and vicious teeth, and a violent allergy to water. Elphaba yearns all her life for the approval of her father, but it is given instead to her armless sister, Nessarose. She is Glinda’s roommate at a nearly-Hogwartian academy, where she is the butt of jokes perpetrated by the good Glinda and her noble friends. Her one friend, Doctor Dillamond, is a Goat trying valiantly to find a scientific basis to fight the Wizard’s denial of Animal Rights.

Shortly after Doctor Dillamond is murdered, the three girls&#8212Glinda, Elphaba and Nessarose&#8212are recruited by the politically-connected Headmistress, Madame Morrible, to become sorceress-ministers for the North (Glikkus), South (Quadling Country) and East (Munchkinland) quadrants of Oz. The west (Vinkus or “Winkie” Country) is considered too rural to be a threat to the empire-building Wizard. Elphaba escapes this geas (perhaps), hiding in the Emerald City, abetting the terrorist rebel forces, engaging in a long love affair with Fiyero, Prince of the Vinkus.

Fiyero is murdered by the Gale Force (the Imperial Storm Troopers of the Wizard), and Elphaba eventually makes her way to the Vinkus with a young boy who may be his son. As the muledriver observes on this trip,

To the grim poor, there need be no pour quois tale about where evil arises; it just arises; it always is. One never learns how the witch became wicked, or whether that was the right choice for her…

Part of the fun of the novel is recognizing elements from the Baum series or from the 1939 movie. A misdirected Life Powder animates a mounted rack of antlers on the wall&#8212and foreshadows the wonderful Gump from the second book of the series. Madame Morrible’s murdering manservant Grommetik is Tik-Tok of Oz. Young Elphaba is disgusted by an experiment on a Lion cub too young to have been removed from its mother&#8212when she frees the Animal, we know this cub will grow into the Cowardly Lion. When Elphaba rescues a snow monkey, we see the origin of the flying Monkey squadrons that will eventually carry off Dorothy, Toto and the Lion.

But much of the story is darker than Baum’s tale ever wanted to be. Glinda’s award of the silver slippers to Dorothy is a coldly-calculated propaganda move designed to help the Wizard crush the Munchkinland rebellion. The Emperor Wizard’s emblem, a balloon and basket with crossed bars beneath it, looks like a skull and crossbones at first glance. The Wizard himself is revealed as a tyrannical Satanist who hints at having performed human sacrifice to get to Oz from the Other Land in order to retrieve an earthly Grimmoire. (And who he sacrificed is one of the surprises at the end of the book.)

Elphaba castigates herself as a failure, seeking redemption from her sins even while she vehemently denies that redemption is possible. The evil of this Witch, it seems in the end, is in squandering her love on the inanimate and unconscious, while ignoring or rejecting the people that surround her. Her final baptism (remember, we know how this story ends) releases her at last from her unhappy life.

This is no child’s tale. Read it, and I guarantee you’ll never see the Wizard of Oz in quite the same way again.

Second opinion: Read No Milk‘s post for an opinion on the Wicked! stage show, and Matt Moore‘s take on the novel.

Powered by

About DrPat

  • http://wisdomandmurder.blogspot.com Lisa McKay

    Great review, DrPat. This book fascinated me, and I think Maguire is a terrific writer. I have since read Lost and Confessions Of An Ugly Stepsister, both of which were good, but neither of which had the complexity of this one.

  • http://paperfrigate.blogspot.com DrPat

    I think the complexity of Wicked rises from the shared background experience we all have with the story. It’s the same thing that makes Scrooged a brilliant film – that fresh take on the old tale that illuminates some of its shadowed corners…

  • http://www.gnomestories.com parker

    Thanks for the in-depth review. I was all caught up in the prose and fifteen hundred ways to say f*ck, so I didn’t get all of the layered references. I guess I need to read it again.

  • http://paperfrigate.blogspot.com DrPat

    The fact that all that physical intercourse is such a source of unhappiness and disaster is a large part of what makes this NOT a kid’s book. Elphaba is simply not the only wicked one in Wicked.

  • Tai.

    Yes, this book is NOT a childs book. There is a lot of “contact” in the book, but, around that, is a wonderful book that I enjoyed very much.

  • http://paperfrigate.blogspot.com DrPat

    I wonder if anyone has read either of the books Maguire DID write for children? Leaping Beauty looks like a confabulation of the Frog Prince and Briar Rose, while Six Haunted Hairdos doesn’t appear to be based on any well-known tale.

  • JB

    Quite frankly I was shocked by much of the content in this book. It was unnecessary and disturbing.

  • Ashley

    I’m wondering if you can fill me in on what you refer to as “one of the surprises at the end of the book” – who did the Wizard sacrifice in order to get to Oz? I just finished Wicked last night. I felt like there were many questions left unanswered (I won’t go into detail, since I don’t want to spoil anything). Can you post a comment or something that will tell me?

  • Jeff

    This book was awful. Nothing like the Wizard of Oz a really sad let down. It sucked even as the political/psychological it tried to be. No magic just a bunch of sick and twisted characters.

  • Ms. G

    I think Mr. McGuire’s telling of this tale from a “different” perspective is refreshing and entertaining. You probably will not enjoy this if you are wanting to read a Part 2-like version of Mr. Baum’s classic or a simple childlike fairytale. This book is entended for adult readers with imaginative, yet mature minds.
    I am actually still reading the book (200+ pages in), but I have plans to finish soon, as I have tickets for the stage play next week. I am thoroughly enjoying it so far.
    Cheers!