Home / TV / TV Review: Sherlock – “The Hounds of Baskerville”

TV Review: Sherlock – “The Hounds of Baskerville”

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

In this day and age, one does not expect to hear the sentence “Mr. Holmes, they were the footprints of a gigantic hound!” In this adaptation of the 1902 Conan Doyle story about a monstrous hound stalking the moors of Dartmoor, it is the phrasing that grabs the interest of the great detective rather than the contents of the sentence. It is this example that serves to underscore how great an adaptation it is of the original stories and also subverts your expectations formed by the existing source material. Writer Mark Gatiss takes a relic from the original novel (which I’ve referred to as the Sherlock Holmes equivalent of a money shot, in that it’s what you expect to see in a Sherlock Holmes adaptation in the same way a money shot is used in pornography) and makes it essential to the solution of the mystery.

However, the actual problem that I had with the episode lies in the mystery itself. Although it had a lot of twists and turns, I’d worked out the overall solution to the mystery in a matter of ten minutes. Admittedly the motives and the means were somewhat beyond me at this point but the full solution came from information that we didn’t possess (in simple terms, I had the how, but not the who or the why). If you can get past the roadblock of mentally screaming at Sherlock to think of the obvious solution, then the rest is a well-done horror story.

Holmes fans will notice that most of the names from The Hound of the Baskervilles are still there in some form, with the exception of Selden, the escaped convict from the local prison. Barrymore is now a major at the local military base and Stapleton is now a female scientist. Those expecting it will also notice the Grimpen Minefield, rather than the Grimpen Mire. The perpetrator and Holmes’ client are completely new, albeit falling into the roles of existing characters.

While it wasn’t as good as the last episode (which was fantastic), it was still damn good in its own right and is a very enjoyable way to pass the time. In a way, I hope this episode is the worst of this series. Because that would mean that the whole series is of fantastically high quality. 

At the time of writing, the last episode of Sherlock is due to air in a couple of hours time, and I’m really excited to see how the writers handle their adaptation of “The Final Problem”, known as “The Reichenbach Fall”. I can only hope that Stephen Thompson’s effort this year turns out better than “The Blind Banker.”

Anyone who wants to watch this online can go here to the BBC iPlayer (U.K. only), and the final episode of this series airs at 9 in the evening in the U.K.

Powered by

About Scott Varnham

  • Aku

    The one and only detective returns. I think this series and the movies has been a real success in the remake of this legend. You could remake every story with new technology and story telling I think but this has really made it the right way.