Today on Blogcritics
Home » TV » TV Review: Law & Order: SVU – “Sugar”

TV Review: Law & Order: SVU – “Sugar”

Warning: mild spoilers

The “synopsis” (of the first 10 minutes): A young woman’s body is found stuffed inside a suitcase, and Stabler and Benson find a chief suspect in the victim’s boyfriend, who claims he was on his boat; an uncooperative dating site CEO refuses to comment on the case.

What the synopsis DOESN’T tell you is that the body is found by a couple of geocachers. I had never heard of this hobby until watching this episode, and it turns out this GPS quest for ordinary items has a tendency to freak out the police in real life. A couple of masturbating jokes tickle the audience members who are 10 years old, and this episode is un. Der. Way.

Detective Benson In Front Of Emily Keefe On Computer ScreenGoing from seeking crap as treasure to seeking treasure in exchange for nookie, the suitcase-sized girl identified as Emily Keefe worked for a social networking site called tastysugar.com that matched up gold diggers with sugar daddies. So far the website doesn’t exist yet in real life, although NBC’s parent company owns the domain. And what kind of name is that? Isn’t all sugar, by definition, tasty? Unless you burn it, I guess. Then it’s just tasteless carbon. (tastelesscarbon.com, by the way, would make a great dating website for lonely scientists.)

The “uncooperative dating CEO” is the hip happenin’ Vance Shepard (Eric McCormack of Will and Grace popularity). Shepard runs a fun, progressive Internet venture company who offers free meals and perks like, apparently, discounts on boob jobs to employees who want them. I’ve always wanted one of those!

Vance Shepard Is The CEO Who Wants You To Love HimYou’re not gonna believe this, but Shepard had a pre-existing relationship with Keefe. But having just played a rousing game of office foosball with one of his high-moraled employees, he stonewalls Stabler and Benson about knowing anything about anything. (He can’t even remember if he owns tastysugar.com. What a capitalist pioneer. That’s just how successful he is!) Stabler is forced to go undercover on a hot date with Emily’s “sugar baby BFF.” Try putting that on a business card.

Eventually the good guys discover Shepard’s little tryst with the stowed away victim. (Why don’t they ever just admit this stuff in the first scene? It saves the taxpayers so much money.) Shepard’s alibi of attending his 17-year-old daughter’s soccer game at the time of fell through, and blammo. He’s a murder suspect.

On the whole, McCormack did pretty well as Shepard. Then again, Vance Shepard was just a heterosexual Will Truman with weaker father skills and fewer obnoxiously-voiced friends. It was right in his wheelhouse.

The add-on prosecutor that is A.D.A Sonya Paxton (Christine Lahti) showed some claws when she rattled Shepard’s “augmented” assistant into breaking down more of his alibi the night of the murder, which was probably the first time I’ve seen Paxton actually do something worth smiling about. But then her character lost me again after railing on and on about how sugardaddyism (my own word) is basically glorified prostitution and should be punishable by law as such. It’s one of those micro-dicussions the L&O brand loves to interject from time to time. Partnered detectives, for example, would find out (gasp!) they don’t agree on abortion! And you probably disagree with the fictional people too. You’re like one of the gang!.

But it sounds like they’re going to try and grow Paxton’s character as a theory-based lawyer (i.e., stopping ironclad confessions she thinks could get suppressed at trial) who starts seeing some pretty nasty real world experiences, thereby earning the SVU’s trust. They’re going to make me empathize with this woman, and I can already tell I’m not going to like it, but at the same time I will.

About Suss

  • http://www.svufans.net SpyBarbie

    Nice recap! I agree with you about that ending being completely predictable – I saw it coming a mile away and I’m not the most observant person in the world either. But I did enjoy the humor (so I guess I’m 10?, lol), the interrogation scenes, the acting, I thought it was a solid episode overall.

    I miss Munch too, but fortunately he’ll be in the next week’s episode, 11.03 – Solitary.

  • WL

    Agree with KM. HATE the new ADA. She’s all bluster and no substance. If they wanted a hard ass ADA character for the sake of conflict with the SVU squad, why don’t they just bring back Kim Greylek? At least Michaela McManus was prettier.

  • http://www.svufans.net SpyBarbie

    I have to disagree with KM and WL. I, for one, am relieved Michaela McManus is gone – I thought her acting was very wooden and she didn’t bring anything to the show. Her good looks did not make me cringe any less whenever she was on screen, I’m sorry to say. Sonya Paxton is a bitch, yes, but IMO Christine Lahti is a much more talented actress than McManus, and even though Paxton is not very likable, she’s an interesting character, there’s a reason for her behavior – so no, she’s not a “hard ass just for the sake of it” – which they’re slowly exploring on the show. That being said, even though I’m enjoying Lahti’s arc, I’m counting the days till Stephanie March’s return – IMO she’s the best ADA SVU has ever had and I’d like for her to be the show’s “regular” ADA. I hope they’re able to secure SM for additional episodes after her 10 eps are up this season.