Home / Culture and Society / Arts / Theater / Theatre Review (LA): Phantom of the Opera National Tour at the Pantages

Theatre Review (LA): Phantom of the Opera National Tour at the Pantages

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The National Tour of Andrew Lloyd Webber’s Phantom of the Opera comes to a close on, appropriately, Halloween night in Los Angeles, a place that can be pretty scary all by itself but is also known for romance and intrigue.

One wonders if the original story-teller, Gaston Leroux of France, had any idea how famous this story would become. There are currently five English translations, and the story has been adapted by a slew of books, novels, movies, children’s books, and several musicals. The musical adaptations include ones by Hill, Yeston, and Lloyd Webber.

The most famous of these is Webber’s Phantom of the Opera; it has had more performances in New York and worldwide than any of the other musicals. Its reputation has only been enhanced when the stories of Eric the Phantom were said to be based on a real person. Lon Chaney Sr. gave a riveting performance in the silent movie version, and there was scandal about some of the music having been “borrowed” from Puccini and even Pink Floyd. Nonetheless, the musical remains one of the great triumphs of the musical theatre.

I have seen Phantom five times. The best of the lot was, and remains, the shortened version, a blessed 95 minutes, in Las Vegas, especially when that extraordinary performer, Brent Barrett, played Eric. The production is spectacular, with the whole theatre being converted to the Paris Opera House, and the famous falling chandelier coming down in five pieces not just one.

In New York I enjoyed Howard McGillin as the Phantom. In the original L.A. production (the longest running show on the West Coast) I loved the Raoul, Michael Piontek, and as for the Phantom, I loved Davis Gaines (though a bit too young but what a voice) and Michael Crawford (spooky but a weird voice), but was disappointed in Robert Guillaume. I also liked Dale Kristen as Christine Daae; she is known as having a voice of steel and was the only Christine allowed to play all eight performances weekly.

So what about the cast for the National Tour currently at the Pantages? Well, first let me say that, next to the glorious interior of the Pantages, the normally glittering sets and costumes of the tour looked tacky. Secondly, the performance I saw featured an understudy as the Phantom by the name of Dallyn Vail Bayles. He has a terrific voice, but allowed his Phantom to get whiney. It seemed to be his first go-round, as the cast all applauded him.

Trista Moldavan doesn’t have a strong voice, but she got better in the second act. For some odd reason, one of my favorites scenes, the one with the song “Past the Point of No Return,” lacked tension. And the direction seemed odd.

Speaking of direction, the actual opera scenes have been allowed to become total camp. Whether this is due to boredom after a long tour or misdirection I don’t know, but it makes the whole story a bit silly. Sean MacLaughlin is simply magnificent as Raoul, with a strong masculine presence and a glorious voice. It was great to see D.C. Anderson having a great time as Monsieur Andre. He is funny and has a lovely voice too.

But for the most part I am quibbling. The audience loved it, and if you haven’t seen it or want to have your kids experience it on-stage, rush down to the Pantages, where it is playing until Oct. 31. Bon Voyage Monsieur Phantom.

Powered by

About Robert Machray

  • Paige

    I didn’t particularly care for this article, and true POTO fans will know why and agree. He isn’t a real tried and true fan, otherwise he wouldn’t like the Vegas show for the fact that it is “the shortened version, a blessed 95 minutes” as though he couldn’t sit through a longer version. The longer version is the best in my opinion, as you lose part of the story and/or beautiful music in the shortened version.

    Just my opinion, and we are all entitled to one, even the author of this article.

  • Adam

    I saw it last night and most of the actors just seemed to be very tired and were just hitting their marks. I can’t imagine it’s easy to do a show night after night for years on end, but at the same time, everyone in the audience paid a lot of money for Phantom, and if you can’t work up the energy to give me that then let your understudy do it, I’m sure they’d love to go on.

    The only person who didn’t seem tired was Tim Martin Gleason, who took the Phantom into raving lunacy in the first scene. By the end of Act One he was practically foaming at the mouth, and in the final scene I wasn’t sure if he’d ever stop twitching. In short, way WAY over the top.