Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » The Yin, Yang of the 111th Congress

The Yin, Yang of the 111th Congress

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

The door soon will close on what is turning out to be one of the more enigmatic chapters of American government. During the past two years, Congress has been its most productive in decades, yet ultimately is reviled by the American public.

Regardless of how much longer Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi decide to hold open the current lame-duck session, they cannot alter the march of time. January will come, and the 111th Congress will be history.  This Congress has produced “a legislative output ‘in Great Society territory’ for its reach and importance,” according to Burdett Loomis, a congressional scholar at the University of Kansas.  David Leonhardt of the New York Times remarked in May that “Congress and the White House have completed 16 months of activity that rival any other since the New Deal in scope or ambition.”

The legislative accomplishments include a nearly $1 trillion economic stimulus program, landmark healthcare reform, the most extensive regulation of the banking industry since the Great Depression, greater protection for consumers when they use credit cards, a jobs-creation measure known as the HIRE Act, an overhaul of Pentagon weapons procurement, and more recently, greater regulation of food safety as well as a repeal of the ban on gays serving openly in the military, among a number of others.

Moreover, to enact their expansive agenda, congressional Democrats had to overcome what was usually unified and constant obstruction on the part of their Republican colleagues. Senate Republicans doubled an already-rising use of the filibuster just in the four years Democrats held their majority.

Opponents and nay-sayers, of course, will take issue with the quality, not quantity, of output. Conservatives contend many of these new laws have wrongly extended the reach of government, while many liberals argue that often they haven’t gone far enough.  Certainly, voters punished lawmakers at the polls in November, defeating record numbers of Democrats and handing the House of Representatives back to Republicans to control.  And even more than a month after the 2010 midterms, as many as 83 percent of Americans continue to disapprove of the job Congress is doing.

Yet that doesn’t fully explain things. On the most macro level, 51 percent of Americans think the intended policies of the new Republican leadership will move the country in the wrong direction. Even after delivering Democrats a “shellacking,” to use President Obama’s term for it, Americans are evenly divided as to whether Democratic policies would be good for the nation.  Even diving deeper into what was arguably the most contentious achievement of the current Congress, healthcare reform, 57 percent want to either leave the law as is (18 percent) or change it so it does more to change the health care system (39 percent).  On the issue of Wall Street reform, the public says that it supports that new law by a strong 58-39 margin.  That same poll asked whether the public more generally approves or disapproves of “government regulation of business.” The public said it did, on a margin of 55 percent to 45 percent.  This hardly amounts to a full repudiation of Democratic policies. Further, even as Obama himself continues to enjoy lukewarm approval numbers at best, the president is still more trusted than his GOP rivals to solve the nation’s problems and help the beleaguered middle class.

One answer to the conundrum of the 111th Congress could be the fact that the American people quite simply are profoundly frustrated and not quite sure where to turn, which shouldn’t be terribly surprising given an environment of sharp rhetoric and deep anxiety over persistently high unemployment and a sluggish U.S. economy.

The coming 112th Congress likely won’t match its predecessor in legislative output. But perhaps the debates it will engender will at least help clarify what the public wants to support.

Powered by

About Scott Nance

  • http://blogcritics.org/writers/dr-dreadful/ Dr Dreadful

    All these wildly contradictory polls just go to demonstrate that the American public at large either doesn’t pay attention to politics, or is getting poor information, or (more likely) a combination of both.

    I suspect that if you were to ask a random person in the street what they thought of Congress, they’d express a negative opinion. If you then asked them to explain what it was Congress had actually done that was so bad, they probably wouldn’t be able to tell you.

  • Doug Hunter

    It’s very easy to be unhappy with congress even if you prefer the party in power over the other. I despise Democrats and their cancerous big government “accomplishments” as you term them more than Republicans. That doesn’t mean I’m happy with Republican’s anti-liberty bible thumping positions or corporate welfare or selling out government to the highest bidder or even putting our children further into debt to fund tax cuts now. I don’t think there’s any paradox or that ignorance is required as an explanation.

  • http://takeitorleaveit.typepad.com/an roger nowosielski

    “I don’t think there’s any paradox or that ignorance is required as an explanation.”

    Quite right. But in that case, carry the ball further. Haven’t we reached the limits of reasonable governance? And if so, what are the root causes and how do we fix it?

  • Glenn Contrarian

    Why is such a successful session of Congress so hated? Because people are generally very uncomfortable watching sausage being made, no matter how delicious the end result may be. That, and part of what enables such distaste of the process is the 24’hour news cycle and institutionalized misinformation factories like Fox News and the right-wing noise machine. Look at how many outright lies they foisted upon the American public (like ‘death panels’, for one)…but did we see them holding their own people accountable for spreading lies?

    No.

    Those who pay attention have seen this before – in America in the days of Boss Tweed…and in any despotic tyranny one cares to name – for in such places, insisting on the truth becomes a form of rebellion and is punishable by death or (as is the case in America) political ostracization.

  • Cannonshop

    #4 Why? because it’s a success at deepening the bankruptcy of the nation, curtailing individual liberty for the citizens, and deepening the government’s meddling in the lives of the same, while demonstrating a de-facto anti-intellectualism whilst simultaneously accusing their critics of being ignorant.

    “We have to pass the bill to know what is in it”-Nancy Pelosi, defending the decision to pass a bill without reading it-the 2000 page “Landmark” (indeed, a monument to the worship of the State-over-all…)