Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Spirituality » The White House Responds to Robertson’s Comments

The White House Responds to Robertson’s Comments

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Mark this day in the record books: I actually agree with the White House. Trent Duffy, White House Deputy Press Secretary, assailed Pat Robertson for his inappropriate comments about Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

Robertson, on his television program “The 700 Club”, had said that Israel was God’s land. He said of Sharon, “…for any prime minister of Israel who decides he is going to carve it up and give it away, God says, `No, this is mine.’” The implication was clear: Sharon’s stroke was divine retribution for the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza last year.

Duffy, in a press release today, said “Those comments are wholly inappropriate and offensive and really don’t have a place in this or any other debate.” Kudos to you Duffy, and to the whole White House Press team.

What was Robertson thinking? This reactionary form of ministry might win him points with his hard core supporters, but if he’s trying to draw less radical Christians to his television ministry, this isn’t the way to do it. Most Christians tend to have a view of God as loving, not hateful and vengeful.

In a press release on his website, we find the following explanation:

According to his spokesperson, Angell Watts, Robertson is simply reminding his viewers what the Bible has to say about efforts made to divide the land of Israel.

As a Christian (Gnostic Christian), I find this a ridiculous explanation. Robertson should apologize. He owes his listeners and Sharon that much, at least. His comments were simply offensive. There was no divine truth in them. It was simply the opinion of a man who is obviously out of connection with the real world.

The fact that the Bush Administration chose to comment on Mr. Robertson’s statements should be a clear indication to Robertson that he will find no support for his hateful words. Suck it up, Robertson, apologize, and let us all move on from this ugly business so that Christians can do what they are supposed to do: Pray for Sharon and his family, and wish them all the best.

(This originally appeared on Left to My Own Devices)

Powered by

About Joe

  • david r. mark

    Agreed. The Bush Administration would do itself a favor to distance itself from any and all Relgious Right “leaders” — who all too frequently lead in inappropriate comments that defy religious teachings.

  • http://theugliestamerican.blogspot.com Andy Marsh

    I don’t think he will. Did he ever apologize for the statements he made about Chavez’s murder?

    He’s a freaking loon! And I live to damn close to the crazy bastard!

    He once said that his prayers to God had stopped a hurricane

    Felix made a left hand turned and rolled right through my backyard! He f#@

  • http://dianahartman.blogspot.com/ diana hartman

    any apology he makes isn’t going to mean anything…sometimes we say things and only a complete change seen over the course of time will do — and sometimes not even then…
    using God as his excuse, robertson will continue to be hateful, nasty, and spiteful — unapologetically or not…
    he ought worry more about kharma than who does what to whom on whose front porch…

  • http://trinimansblog.blogspot.com/ Triniman

    I wonder if they can yank his broadcast license or get the IRS to do an audit. Surely calling for the death of an elected leader of a sovereign country violates some condition of the broadcast license.

  • http://www.templestark.com Temple Stark

    “God says, ‘No, this is mine’.”

    yep, God acts like a 5 years old