Home / Culture and Society / The GOP Is Looney Tunes; But That’s Not the Real Tragedy

The GOP Is Looney Tunes; But That’s Not the Real Tragedy

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

There’s a political tragedy unfolding in America, and I suspect it’s going to get a lot worse. If we’re lucky, our national troubles are the birth pangs of something much better, but such a notion is more likely a chimera; indeed, if human history is any indication, America’s political structure is in decline and will never, ever, recover from its current downward spiral.

It’s not just the War on Women such as the outrageous instances of women who miscarry pregnancies being charged with murder. Nor is it the oh so patriotic “War on [nonexistent] Voter Fraud”. It’s not even the passage of “Papers, please” laws in Arizona and Alabama or the proclamation by the most influential conservative in America, Rush Limbaugh, that teachers are parasites on society or the push to repeal the 14th Amendment which, among other things, negated the infamous Dred Scott decision by the Supreme Court.

No, these are not the real tragedy; they’re just the symptoms, as were Iran-Contra, the invasion of Iraq, and the use of torture against prisoners of war. The real tragedy, the sickness that has infected America’s political right wing, is that none, not even their own leading lights, can gainsay them. No matter how ludicrous, no matter how downright silly are the notions of the right-wing extremists who now form the base of the Republican party, a Republican politician disagrees with dogma at his peril, as GOP presidential candidate Jon Huntsman found out when he had the bad manners to publicly choose science over creationism and anthropogenic global-warming denial.

Did the Republican Party listen to Jon Huntsman? No. Did the Republican party listen to George W. Bush’s speechwriter David Frum? No. Did they listen to John McCain about the evils and ineffectiveness of torture? No, they held their collective noses (as they will this year for Romney) and voted for him in 2008, but he changed very few Republican minds when it came to torture. Did they even listen to Mr. Conservative, Barry Goldwater? No. In fact, in 1996 he sadly noted to Bob Dole, “We’re the new liberals of the Republican party. Can you imagine that?”

Where did this political poison, this party-wide sociopathy come from? It comes from the man whom the Republican Party looks upon with deep, unquenchable pride: Ronald Reagan. He did it by popularizing the nine words that comprise The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican. How else could Republicans even consider looney tunes politicians like Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Rick Perry, and Newt Gingrich? What else can explain the tectonic shift away from accepting (as they once did) the realities of evolution and anthropogenic global warming? Here’s a good article describing four things Republicans used to believe before the party left the mainstream of the American people, but no longer.

Now of course Reagan, who raised taxes repeatedly, instituted amnesty for illegal aliens, openly decried the income gap between CEOs and workers, bailed out Chrysler, and enthusiastically worked hand-in-hand for the good of the nation with the Democratic Speaker of the House, Tip O’Neill, would never have intended for the Republican Party to go where it is now. But then, he could not have foreseen that the aforementioned “Eleventh Commandment” would combine with the rise of the religious right, Rush Limbaugh and conservative talk radio, and the “I’m more conservative than you” game that has been played since the early 1990’s, all to equal the current insane asylum that we see passing bills like those in the first paragraph of this article, bills that I cannot believe Ronald Reagan would ever have willingly signed into law. In fact, one could with surprising ease make the case that Barack Obama’s administration has been significantly more conservative than Reagan’s!

Be that as it may, it was still Ronald Reagan who enabled the devolution of the Grand Old Party into what we see today. He did it with that nine word Eleventh Commandment that prohibited Republicans from criticizing, rebuking, or correcting each other, and by doing so took away their single best tool to keep themselves from going down the path of extremism. To be sure, in the Republican primaries we saw the candidates take pot shots at each other, but each of the candidates was forced by circumstance to pander to the Tea Party crowd and the ever farther to the right Republican base. None of the candidates could talk common sense to the Republican base and hope to advance in the primaries, as Jon Huntsman found out. Can anyone here envision the Republicans electing a candidate (not counting Ron Paul) who would openly support a position that is inimical to the Republican base, as candidate Obama did with nuclear power despite the reaction of the Democratic base? No, I don’t think so!

What’s the solution? I really don’t know. All I can see are possibilities and probabilities, none of which are palatable. Assuming President Obama wins reelection, I do not foresee the Republicans changing one whit. I think it’s safe to say the Republican congressional leadership (with an almost-explicit “do it or else” from Rush Limbaugh and company) will continue its policy of obstruction at every turn no matter how routine and necessary the legislation was before January 20th, 2009. They will have no choice, for to do otherwise would risk vilification by conservative talk radio and certain defeat in the next Republican primary. They will soften their positions on gay rights, but that’s about it. They will continue their war on women, on immigrants, and on voting rights. And they will do so in blissful ignorance of the changing demographic of the American electorate.

It is as Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein noted in The Washington Post: “The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition. When one party moves this far from the mainstream, it makes it nearly impossible for the political system to deal constructively with the country’s challenges.” The link they included is to an article concerning the growing body of scientific evidence that yes, there is an identifiable psychological difference between conservatives and liberals.

A time of transition is coming. America will either come to its senses and return to the liberal path we began to tread with the Civil Rights movement, or America will devolve further down the road to the status that, without exception, describes every strongly conservative nation on the planet: that of a third-world nation.

Powered by

About Glenn Contrarian

White. Male. Raised in the deepest of the Deep South. Retired Navy. Strong Christian. Proud Liberal. Thus, Contrarian!
  • Igor

    @1-Dr. J: #3 is a very bad idea. We had that kind of skills oriented education system before WW2 and it damn near cost us the war!

    All our college educated engineers were educated in skills like welding, and mass production methods, and their math and physics courses were minimal. If it were not for the European and Brit engineers with deep math and science educations we NEVER would have been able to do the Manhattan project, nor even simple weapons like radar and code-breaking.

    After WW2 there was a big revolution in engineering education to restore math and physics to supremacy because the American engineering community was humiliated by their poor performance.

    This illustrates one of the problems of having uninformed naives try to set policy based on their unsupported theories.

    (3) The delivery of education must be simplified in favor of a skills centered orientation. A purely academic education is not serving the needs of students seeking lifetime careers and employment.

    Public education should serve public needs, not the personal employment requirements of individuals. Personal objectives are only incidental. College is NOT trade school.

  • Is a larger population going to impact the rate at which we can bring down unemployment. The population in 2000 was 300MM and now the population is 313MM with an 8.3% unemployment rate. Would the unemployment rate be this high assuming a 300MM population?

    Also, health and wellness are a function of what people eat. Why do sodas have upwards of 30 or more grams of sugar when 18 grams of sugar per soda is plenty?

    We need to feed schoolchildren things like vegetable juice, yogurt, fiber, a multivitamin and eggs instead of sugary cereals and large amounts of carbohydrates like french fries and greasy cheeseburgers.

    You can’t be serious about reforming health care if you don’t solve the junk food problem. We need higher taxes on junk food so that people are driven to make more healthful choices. Why not charge $2.00 for a fishburger and $10.00 for a tripleburger with cheese ?

    With regard to education, children need to read quality literature with grade level appropriate vocabulary instead of books loaded to the gills with colloquialisms. That’s why students are memorizing vocabulary lists for the SAT exam.

    When a student in high school or college reads a book, he/she should thumb through the presentation and record advanced vocabulary for look-up prior to reading the book.

    Once a comprehensive vocabulary list has been assembled and the dictionary consulted, then the student is ready to read the book. In addition, publishers could cooperate by placing advanced vocabulary definitions at the end of the book to facilitate reading and learning new vocabulary. This is how I read books and learned new vocabulary.

  • Glenn Contrarian

    The first paragraph in this article is another good example of what happens when a Republican candidate dares to interject even a smidgen of common sense into the political ‘debate’ among Republicans. It shows the price Newt Gingrich paid for rightly calling Paul Ryan’s proposed budget “Right-wing social engineering”.

  • So far, fortunately, the GOP’s extreme stances haven’t resulted in a corresponding leftward dash by the Democrats. That may change if the Dems lose the White House in November, or don’t make inroads in the Capitol. If that happens, the current poo-throwing will look like a kid’s birthday party with a bouncy castle.

  • Dr. J,

    You frame your points as challenges for both parties, but every single point you mention highlights the GOPs obstructionism and their inability to cope with reality.

    1) The US population growth is perfectly sustainable for many years and is far from a burning crisis. Reality: Every recession has a scapegoat. In the early 80’s we demonized Japan; in 1994 CA almost passed prop 189 (an anti-immigration bill); and now, despite Mexican immigration being net zero, hysterical laws are popping up nationally. Yet, the economic impact of legal and illegal immigration are consistently shown to be negligible.

    2) Crumbling infrastructure: Reality check: the GOP refuses to pay for it. Even when factoring in state and local, Americans are paying the lowest taxes in 40 years.

    3) Whether this makes sense or not, we still require education. Reality Check: In what way does demonizing teachers help? This kind of fiscal austerity is the most blindingly shortsighted phenomenon I’ve ever seen in politics.

    4) Exactly! Reality Check: Which is why the Affordable Healthcare Act makes sense – it broadens access to healthcare.

    5) Sorry, I have no idea what that means.

  • Clavos

    Four excellent points in #1, Dr. Maresca.

    Unfortunately, it would appear that the ne’er-do-wells currently inhabiting Congress (on both sides of the aisle) have no intention of doing anything about them, for to do so might jeopardize the steady flow of their campaign funding.

  • Contrarian,

    Loved the article. A (very conservative) family member once asked me rather cynically why I haven’t become more conservative as I got older. I told her, I had but the conservatives are just way outpacing me to the right.

    The article almost reads like a companion piece to one that I wrote on my blog a month ago (my pre-BC days): Do you think this flag makes my dogma look fat? Reagan’s Legacy | Frivolous Disorder.

    I had been following the GOP primaries closely this year, monitoring to see if the republican party is reaching the limits of how far to the right they’ve been able to stretch. Although I am grateful that Santorum was too much for them, I am not particularly heartened by the bat-shit crazy things Romney had to say to win the nod.

  • Both political parties must deal with the new realities.

    (1) The population in the USA is growing at about one million people per year since 2000.

    (2) The infrastructure is crumbling and needs renewal and upgrading everywhere.

    (3) The delivery of education must be simplified in favor of a skills centered orientation. A purely academic education is not serving the needs of students seeking lifetime careers and employment.

    (4) The medical system needs reform to transition from disease management to a health and wellness orientation. Only then will costs level off for a population growing older by the day.

    (5) Spending and debt has to be viewed in terms of the percentage of GDP on a component by component basis.