Today on Blogcritics
Home » The Falconio Trial: Following the Usual Scripts

The Falconio Trial: Following the Usual Scripts

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Australian editors are traditionally interested in the Northern Territory only for crocodile wrestling stories and lurid murder trials; the ongoing Falconio hearing definitely falls the latter category.

A brief summary: a British couple were driving along an Outback highway. She reports that their car was flagged down, the man was shot, she was tied up, but fled and hid in the bush for five hours, before flagging down a passing truck. The boyfriend is presumed dead, but no body has been found.

As might be predicted, media coverage depicting Darwin as “Hicksville” has upset the locals. The Chief Justice is ensuring he gets his name in all the papers, asking of the writer of the offending article: “How did he get out? Presumably by horse and carriage?” Entirely in line with the script.

Also in line with the script, all aspects of the reputation of the dead man’s partner is being trashed in court, despite the fact that she is a victim of forced imprisonment, serious assault etc and spent many hours in fear of her life. The fact that all of the details she gave of her ordeal, no doubt in a state of shock soon after, and subsequently, don’t exactly square up, is hardly a surprise.

From what I know of the nature of memory in shocking circumstances (some from personal experience), she will have eventually constructed out of fragmentary memories of periods of terror and panic a coherent narrative for herself – as would anyone; there’s nothing solid about memory.

Actually, she’s already been found guilty of not being sufficiently “womanly” – ie not breaking down in public – just like Lindy Chamberlain (whose baby was taken by a dingo. She subsequently spent years in jail, guilty of not crying for the cameras.)

But of course had either woman done so, she would have been at fault too – either for “acting” or being “unstable”.

Find more like this on Philobiblon, where an attorney has left some interesting comments about her own experiences.

Powered by

About Natalie Bennett

Natalie blogs at Philobiblon, on books, history and all things feminist. In her public life she's the leader of the Green Party of England and Wales.
  • gary

    I have been on a cracker site for ages on this case, and it surprised me the amount of hate I saw, especially from Aussie women, many who believe she is the the culprit of this crime. It seems to have stemmed from her “ilicit” affair, as described by one journalist, with another backpacker. Many seemed to have pre-judged her as evil, as also many things did not quite add up.(it took place in pitch darkness)Many could not understand her emotions, as you said, which fluctuated. I could understand why she lied to the police over this affair, as we now know it had absolutely nothing to do with the case. To call it “ilicit” is ridiculous, as the general public have not a clue of their relationship, whether it was open, or how close they were.
    It amazed me how quick people were to decide who was guilty, and stay with their gut instinct for so long, as evidence mounted against Murdoch with each day. It has wained for weeks now, and those so voicerous not so long ago have all but stopped their wild theories the more they have been enlightened of facts/witnesses, perhaps through embarassment. As this case is now over 4 years old, I wonder how they could ever have found a jury that was completely unaware of his previous crime history