Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » The Champion of Mediocrity: Rick Santorum’s Unspoken Appeal

The Champion of Mediocrity: Rick Santorum’s Unspoken Appeal

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Aside from the fact that he not only wears his theological convictions on his sleeve but also wants to enshrine them in public policy measures, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum appears to be gaining popularity with a certain subset of voters because they actually see themselves in him.

Considering that Santorum consistently wins in areas which are sparsely populated, on the lower end of the income and education scales, dominated by religious fundamentalists, and culturally insular, one must wonder just exactly what his fans have in store for America. In terms of the national population, the vast majority of his supporters are such hardline social rightists that they are rendered as societal outliers. Perhaps this explains why their warm feelings for him are directly correlated to the absurdity of his rhetoric, which now includes banning pornography and, of course, railing against contraceptives.

Ironically, much of Santorum’s base sees itself as average people. No doubt this is why they dislike former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney to such a degree. Seeing him as a man of impeccable financial and social means, squarely within the mainstream of society, he becomes a persona non grata. If anything, the ongoing mess which the Santorum groupies are visiting on the Republican presidential primary process should prove once and for all that looking for a candidate that you would like to sit down and drink a cold one with is patently absurd.

Think of it this way; would you want an average fellow sorting through your income tax returns, sketching up a blueprint for your home-to-be, or simply teaching your child or loved one in school? I would imagine that the answer would be an emotive “Of course not!” So how, then, can searching for an ordinary candidate to be president be a winning strategy? Is the United States not deserving of an outright extraordinary occupant for the Oval Office; one who has accomplished so much that it is impossible to rergard that individual as merely ordinary? The answer, for critical or lateral thinkers, should be clear as day.

Focusing on how an aspirant for public office relates to you on a personal basis ultimately breeds the sort of dreck that is surrounding Santorum. No individual with good sense could possibly believe a man who lost his last reelection bid by a historic near twenty point margin to be suitable for the presidency. Especially after bringing up topics which the mainstream of America’s electorate has no interest in whatsoever, Santorum has revealed himself as a particularly unpleasant joke, though not one that does not present the real possibility of danger if somehow elected. It can only be hoped that, as the primary process wears on, a necessary amount of voters will come to understand this.

Powered by

About Joseph F. Cotto

  • Glenn Contrarian

    Joseph –

    Does George W. Bush ring a bell?

    There was a time when the GOP was all about the extraordinary – and though he had his faults, George H.W. Bush (Dubya’s dad) was IMO an extraordinary person. He had the courage to cut the military, raise taxes, and resist going to Baghdad…all of which would get him tossed out of today’s GOP. He was a good and courageous president. Had he been the one running against Obama in 2008, I would have voted for him.

    But with today’s raft of GOP nominees, it’s as I’ve said several times now – if you demand stupid policies, you’re going to get stupid candidates. A simple glance at the “we’re all about jobs” Republican wars on women, brown people, and voter rights should be proof enough of that!

  • roger nowosielski

    Joseph, the only thing that separates Santorum and Rommney in your eyes is that the former is, shall we say, “evangelical” and the latter “cosmopolitan.” But insofar as mediocrity is concerned, they’re pretty much the same.

    It would be far more honest of you to call a spade and spade and simply say where your biases lie, nothing wrong with them. What’s not fair to the reader, however, is you trying to dress up your biases.

    Unless you truly believe Romney to be the kind of smart person you’re taking him for, but I don’t think even you can be that naive.

  • Glenn Contrarian

    Roger –

    Romney is quite intelligent – but you know as well as I that intelligence and wisdom are not mutually inclusive.

  • zingzing

    romney’s a very smart man who has said some very stupid things. he could probably wrap roger up and send him to timbuktu to be sold for an ounce of salt if he wanted. he’s obviously good at what’s good for romney, but he’s bad at relating to voters on a national scale, i guess. just not one of his skills. he’s lived far too privileged a life for that.

    and when the president of the united states pales before you on the entitled asshole meter, you’re going to lose.