Home / The All New, All-Too-Hasty and Very, Very Dangerous Intelligence Bill

The All New, All-Too-Hasty and Very, Very Dangerous Intelligence Bill

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

It shouldn’t take much intelligence to decide to oppose the intelligence bill.

Part of the problem is that this bill is being rushed through in a reaction to circumstances like the Patriot Act was, and you’ve seen the results and unintended consequences of that. The consequences of a half-baked restructuring of American intelligence operations could be much worse.

But that’s nothing.

Because there’s an even bigger problem with the bill.

That problem is George W. Bush.

Yes, him.

Because the White House has now stepped into the legislative process and wants to remove all Congressional oversight of the intelligence agencies:

The Senate bill passed with unanimous support from Republicans and with the votes of all but two Democrats. By contrast, the House bill was fashioned by the chamber’s Republican leadership and was approved over the objections of many Democrats.

Sen. John D. "Jay" Rockefeller IV (D-W. Va.), a member of the conference committee, said the Senate’s chief negotiators [Republicans] had accepted a House demand stripping out all congressional oversight of the national intelligence director. Rockefeller said that he and Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), another committee member, thought such oversight was essential to ensure the proper functioning of the intelligence community.

"All the oversight has been stripped out, and that is just unacceptable," said Rockefeller, the top Democrat on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

In a separate interview, Levin said that he, too, was concerned.

"There are still a lot of remaining issues," said Levin, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. "One of the most important parts of this bill is that we have provisions that ensure the independence and objectivity of intelligence."

The Senate bill, Levin said, strengthened oversight of intelligence activities. "The White House is opposed to congressional oversight and it might be watered down," Levin said, adding that such a revision would make it "very difficult for me" to support the bill.

[White House Intervenes on Behalf of Intelligence Bill LA Times 11/17/04 subscription] (Story links open in new windows)

That’s right, folks.

The White House wants the FBI, CIA, NSA and all the Defense Department intelligence operations to have no accountability.

Think about it.

No checks, no balances. These agencies would be responsible only to the president and the person he names as his security director .

Can you name a time and place in history where we’ve seen this before? [Hint: Blondie was the name of that leader’s dog, not Miss Beazley.]

Is that the America you want?

And especially you Republicans – is this the mandate you gave the president with your vote? Is it still "treasonous" not to support what he wants?

I hope not.

If you agree, email your Senators and House Representative and tell them: "Achtung! You must stop ziss!"

At the very least, contact your House representative – the Republican members of the House are the biggest culprits on this one, although the sneak by the Senate Republican negotiators in contravening the intent of the Senate bill is a close second.

Do it now.

This time, it really matters.


Powered by

About Hal

  • I have been looking at your link for about an hour, afraid to click on it. I say this because these are EXACTLY the headlines I expect to see and hear about for the next four years.

    My biggest concern is that there are no longer checks and balances in the system. Remember what they taught us in 7th grade? The executive branch, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch were created to balance each other out. Well that is moot since the devils and criminals and demons own
    1) the house
    2) the senate
    3) the executive branch
    4) the judicial branch (Supreme Court)
    5) the media (Michael Powell’s GOP controlled FCC)
    6) the majority of the governorships

    You can say this is the will of the people and democracy in action. I call it the most horrible and dangerous time in the history of the world.

    I had a good conversation with my dear Republican friend Travis this weekend. We agreed to differ and left on these interesting points. He said to me “if in 30 years Iraq has become a model of Democracy and stability in that region, will you admit you were wrong?”
    I agreed yes.
    Then (of course) I posed this question to him
    “If in five years everyone in this administration is in jail or under indictment, will agree I was right?”

    he agreed yes. Who knows, maybe we’ll see both. I guess that both would be the ideal situation.

  • The new intelligence setup the White House wants is similar to what it has with the Department of Homeland Security – 180,000 DHS employees are directly responsible to the president.

    This country is being changed, one step at a time, into something that should frighten and horrify Americans because it is so un-American – in fact anti-American ideals. The technique was broadly described by Robert Baden-Powell, founder of the World Scout movement:

    You must not be led aside by fits of disinclination or annoyance; if you give way to these you will never succeed. Patience and perseverance win the day. “Softly, softly, catchee monkey.”

    The people behind the changes have that long-term view, but they are no Boy Scouts.

    And we are the monkeys.