Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Science and Technology » Ten Amazingly Accurate Tech Predictions for 2009

Ten Amazingly Accurate Tech Predictions for 2009

1) Apple will start to lose desktop/laptop market share.

While Apple has never really had a large share of the market, they have been making slow but steady gains the last few years. The biggest increase for Apple is in the college demographic. However, with the stumbling economy, the masses will buy fewer and fewer computers from Apple as they start to do a simple cost/benefit analysis. This will lead to a full reworking of Apple's marketing strategy and long-term plans, thus leading to the new market for Apple.

2) Apple releases a tablet/netbook/large iPod-Touch.

This new market, and new strategy, for Apple will be the release of a netbook/tablet that is essentially a large-screen iPod Touch. While this will get huge sales initially (helping to bump up the netbook market), it will quickly steady out and remain at the roughly 20% market share that Apple currently enjoys. The iNetBook will feature a touch screen, with a stylus as well, and OSX Snow Leopard. Unlike most netbooks, Apple's will be priced in the $500-$600 range, but that should not keep Apple from getting their normal support (I will be buying it the day it comes out).

3) The Netbook market takes off, but Windows XP remains the primary OS.

With the economy going towards the gutter and consumers spending far less than in years past, low-tech gear will gain in leaps and bounds. Most people want computers to e-mail, browse the Internet, and maybe look at pictures, and netbooks fill this niche perfectly. In 2009, netbooks will take about 20%-30% of the laptop market share and will remain in the sub 400$ range. Regardless of any Linux options or any future Apple OS, Windows XP will remain the king of netbook systems.

4) Microsoft will start a phone company, the iPhone will keep growing, Android will stumble.

The Apple iPhone, with its sexy look and easy-to-use touch screen will continue to grow in market share, while its app store makes millions for Apple. The iPhone, which will be available in larger sizes and memory configurations, will soon become the market leader of smart phones. Android, which launched with some fanfare, will soon plummet and disappear as most companies realize that it is better to have a company who can advertise their OS as opposed to you having to do it. Microsoft, in an attempt to keep Windows Mobile alive, will either create a Zune phone or make a play to purchase RIM (BlackBerry) which will give them a strong standing.

5) Google will release a full-fledged OS, un-beta Gmail, and stop supporting Chrome.

Google, preemptively judging their Android OS as being a market-stealer, will release a full-fledged OS for PCs (and maybe Macs). This operating system will mostly rely on cloud computing and will be lightweight, open source, and full of widgets. It will start strongly, but then will fall to Linux-like market share. As part of the release, Google will also release a final and full version of Gmail (only a few years too late) with only a few new features. Gmail will quickly become the dominant online e-mail client. Chrome, which slumped after a large release (like all of Google's products) will be terminated. Instead, Google will acquire Firefox (and Thunderbird) and attempt to gain browsing territory.

6) Microsoft will release Windows 7.

Following the release of Google's OS and Apple's OSX Snow Leopard, Microsoft will launch Windows 7 in the middle of its projected launch window; that is, it will be released in early November. This is just in time for Christmas, and it will be included on all PCs sold as Christmas presents. Unlike Vista, Windows 7 will be greeted with rave reviews and will have a large user base from the start. This will be seen as revitalizing and turning Windows around. I also predict that I will be standing in line and will buy it the second it comes out.

7) The Resurrection of HD-DVD.

As already stated, with the economy in the gutter, consumers are doing their best to spend as little as possible. A dead, but good, format should be able to help them do that. While there will be no new HD-DVD's (for now) released, the pricing of the actual existing movies (a large library of them) and the players are so low that consumers who do not care about the new releases will be starting to buy up these discs. Once there is a large sale record of HD-DVD, Toshiba will start to make the players again. Starting with smaller companies, and then moving to some mainstream studios, HD-DVD will make a comeback.

About Robert M. Barga

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @48

    ??
    This article is predictions, all of which have some factual backing, and none are provable yet

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Come on ,Robert, let’s get our “facts” straight…

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @49

    Apple, Sun, a few others, and all the Linux distros… Hell, the ones on netbook quickly got schooled

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @ 50
    they must love me

    @52
    what?

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apple’s Finder was prior to Windows, So wasn’t IBM’s which started the whole thing. Sun & all the Linux distros are free & open source which is techie language for non-user friendly.

    So far, Google is the only company to stir up the competition with its free software. They will be the ones to watch.

  • http://www.maskedmoviesnobs.com El Bicho

    “Which companies??”

    Linspire had their Lindows

  • http://www.maskedmoviesnobs.com El Bicho

    dang, I must be more tired than I thought. i royally screwed up #50 and copied the wrong line. It should read:

    “Why should I be accurate with facts”

    To give off the illusion that you know what you are talking about.

    time to lie down

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    No worries, El Bicho… Even when your not making “mistakes” your two cents aren’t important.

  • http://www.marksaleski.com Mark Saleski

    the problem with linux is not the software itself but its image and the relative difficulty of actually getting it on a computer. heck, most people have never had the chance to look at it, never mind try it…so it’s windows by default.

    and to brian’s point (45), i’ve always thought that apple made a big mistake in not licensing its o/s. if that thing was easily available on intel clones, the percentages would be a lot different today (and windows would actually be a lot better, due to real competition)

  • http://www.maskedmoviesnobs.com El Bicho

    Most people find not being considered important to your addled, factphobic mind a good thing, so thanks.

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Yes, Mark, that’s what I was referring to. If a company(like Google) could compile an OS that would have the same ease of installation & tech support that’s not from a forum as well as being more secure,stable & not as expensive then MS will have its hands full.

    Or maybe, this is all a fearful illusion in my rotten mind,Hey, El Bicho

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @55

    Most linux distros are user friendly, and the ones on netbooks are exceptionally user friendy. But guess what,even with nice lunux, INSTALLED FOR YOU, people wanted XP

    Why should google’s OS be any different

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @59

    Again, as I have said, Linux is on netbooks standard, most people wanted the XP version. Plus, I have many friends who tried linux then left it, after playing with it. They thought it was UF, easy to deal with, and the like, but couldn’t play games or run full CAD (they refused my FREECAD option)

    I AGREE that apple made that mistake, they really are idiots (but hey, they are a hardware company, OSx is merely to sell their machines)

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @61

    Linux is easy to install, stable, secure, and the like. But it hasn’t taken off, even though they once advertised for it. Why do you think google will be any different

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Why should google’s OS be any different

    Because, Google forced Microsoft’s hand due to their plethora of free applications like Desktop,Gmail,Chrome,etc. They are tearing Windows apart layer by layer by approaching the OS in a different manner by meeting consumers needs first instead of playing “catch up” like MS has been doing for over 10 years now. IMHO, no other company has offered what Google has offered. Oh,btw,Have you ever tried Goog-411?

    (but hey, they[Apple] are a hardware company, OSx is merely to sell their machines)

    That was the whole advantage when Macintosh first came out! it was the first commercially successful personal computer to feature a mouse and a graphical user interface rather than a command line interface. The OS was stored on a chip and there was no software needed to run basic functions. This is what made it possible for Macs to be a faster computer that could handle graphics better. Thus, the reason why they never licensed their OS. They were building the perfect personal computer and in some ways they did. Before they decided to use Intel, imo, their product was far superior to PC.

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @66
    Chrome has no actually going nowhere
    Gmail is a killer application, as are the online documents (though they are far to basic), DEsktop really sucks
    Anyways, they tore them apart in email, and are gaining in office (but they need a stronger offline app to do that), however, history shows Microsoft will win an OS battle with a new OS

    All of my Macies think it was better with intell

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    i meant @65

  • http://marksaleski.com Mark Saleski

    >history shows Microsoft will win an OS battle with a new OS

    they ‘win’ only because they’re the default. most people have never even seen anything else.

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    @68
    As I already explained, we have a case of underpowered notebooks, perfect for Linux, that started with just linux. Guess what, the people chose and wanted XP even though the linux is cheaper

  • http://marksaleski.com Mark Saleski

    you’re making an argument that only has validity very recently: it’s just not all that easy to get a notebook computer with a flavor of linux preinstalled.

    people ‘choose’ xp because it’s all they know.

    i’m not even making an argument that linux is better, just that the average consumer has never even seen it. heck, even heard of it.

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    I meant netbook. %That is all that they had at first, but so many people wanted XP, so they offered it

    I think most people have heard of linux. Hell, it was in a superbowl commercial

    HEHE, apple is now challenging google’s applications. And the funny thing, they are in beta too

  • http://marksaleski.com Mark Saleski

    “heard of linux” is a whole world away from actually seeing it…and having the opportunity to actually use it.

    look, i’m not trying to “win” this argument. my point is that windows has its vast market share not because of the superiority of its product, but because microsoft had the advantage or preinstallation.

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    I agree to that

  • Tom

    This is total bullshit. There is no way that apple will lose market share. 25 years old and still strong

  • http://whalertly.blogspot.com Robert M. Barga

    Effectivly only like 9, from when Jobs came back is all that counts