Today on Blogcritics
Home » Tax the Churches

Tax the Churches

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

A recent discussion on Blogcritics along with this New York Times article about the separation of church and state in Italy have prompted the following thoughts.

I live in Brooklyn, the Borough of Churches. There’s practically a church on every block, and where there isn’t a church, there’s a synagogue or temple. There are also mosques in the neighborhood.

My block has a Seventh Day Adventist church. Its busiest day is Saturday, not Sunday. Crowds of kids play on the sidewalk out front. I don’t know too much about what goes on there, since it’s a Spanish-speaking church. I do know they sponsor food drives and clothing drives, and generally have decent relations with their residential neighbors.

Like all the churches, they don’t pay taxes. Why? Is it because they’re a non-profit organization? I wouldn’t know anything about their finances, but I do know how rich some churches are. The Catholic church, for example, and some of the evangelical churches. It’s a stretch to think of these churches as not-for-profit.

I believe that the tax-exempt status of a religious institution should be proportional to its nondenominational charitable activities.

For example, a church that spends money on fancy cars for its preacher should be taxed on those expenses. A church that runs a soup kitchen but requires its beneficiaries to pray for their supper should have to pay tax on the portion of its income used to run that soup kitchen. A church that owns its building and uses the facility for both worship services and charitable deeds should be taxed according to a formula, the same way a person can deduct home office expenses from his income taxes. Better financial minds than mine could come up with the formula.

If you agree with me that such a proposal is unlikely to be taken seriously in America, you will also probably recognize that we are a religious country, in the sense that religious institutions are given special privileges withheld from individuals, private landowners, and businesses. I don’t agree with these special privileges. But my view is in the minority. It would probably even be fair to describe it as marginal.

Still, think about it next time you walk (or drive) by the churches in your area. What if they all had to pay property taxes the same way you or your landlord does, the same way the commercial building owners on Main St. do? Then your municipality would have more income and could lower property taxes. Your tax burden (or rent) could be less. Meanwhile the churches, if they had to account for every untaxed dollar they spent, would be better practicioners of what they preach.

Powered by

About Jon Sobel

Jon Sobel is an Executive Editor of Blogcritics as well as lead editor of the Culture & Society section. As a writer he contributes most often to Culture, where he reviews NYC theater; he also covers interesting music releases. He writes the blog Park Odyssey, for which he is visiting and blogging every park in New York City—over a thousand of them. Through Oren Hope Marketing and Copywriting you can hire him to write or edit whatever marketing or journalistic materials your heart desires. By night he's a working musician: lead singer, songwriter, and bass player for Whisperado, a member of other bands as well, and a sideman.
  • http://adamantsun.blogspot.com Steve S

    I found this source about tax exempt status’s for churchs.

    Look halfway down the page at this headline:
    501(c)(3) Qualifications

    Item number 3 (just before the item that forbids influencing elections), says this: No part of your church’s net earnings will inure to the benefit of private individuals.

    I don’t know much about the guy you linked too, I know there are scammers out there aplenty. In terms of Robertson, Falwell, etc. who make millions, they do so from University salaries, their own business dealings (Robertson owns a large diamond mine in Africa), lobbyists, television revenue, etc. rather than from a church collection plate. At least that is what we are told, and in order to avoid trouble, it’s probably true.

    Taxes for anybody, even a simple guy like me can get confusing. I don’t know what all of the criteria is for a church. I know there are churches that own and lease out residential property. Is that tax free? I don’t know.

    Churches are supposed to be tax free cuz they’re charities, right? Aren’t other charities tax free? I’m all for taxing churches because I don’t see much charity coming out of them anymore.

  • http://www.kolehardfacts.blogspot.com Mike Kole

    I would argue that America is far less religious than it ever used to be. Sure, Brooklyn is loaded with churches on each block, but that harkens back to the time when they were built- not within the last 10 years, but over 100 years ago, generally, which reflected the beliefs of the immigrant and second-generation population there.

    But, to address the topic: be careful of what you ask for, because you could get it. If you think churches are too involved in public life, and that the line of separation between church and state is fine, just wait until the line is gone.

  • http://adamantsun.blogspot.com Steve S

    Good point, Mike! If churches are taxed, then that gives them the rights of a taxpayer, right? Hmmm, maybe I need to rethink my last paragraph.