Manners Separate Us from the Animals

I have this thing about table manners. The lack thereof makes me nuts.

I never planned to be the local manners police, but having grown up under my mother’s well-aimed flyswatter and Amy Vanderbilt books, I suppose, (sigh) it was fate. You want me to admit one of my best friends volunteered me to teach table manners to her daughter’s Brownie Troop? All right, already yet. She did. I’m planning to do so.

My mother is still so proper we could never put a jar of peanut butter on the table. It had to be in a cut glass jar. Mustard, mayonnaise, and ketchup went into matching condiment dishes. Milk went into a pitcher, usually cut glass. We were never allowed to eat boxed cereal let alone put the box on the table.

If my father wanted Worcestershire Sauce, he put the bottle on the floor by his chair. Paper napkins were an obscenity up there next to certain words we still aren’t allowed to say. Even now when my mother has a picnic, I must do battle with her for the treat of using paper plates, napkins, cutlery, and cups.

Get the picture?

The Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not double-dip or thou shalt burn in hell.

First, nothing is worse than a man wearing a baseball cap or any head covering to the table. I don’t care if you are eating in a fast food joint or a greasy spoon. It is terrible, improper, and shows a complete lack of respect for your surroundings and the people around you.

Guys, you look like a chaw-spitting redneck with a dead deer strapped to the front hood of the pickup and your dead mother-in-law tied to the lawn chair on the tailgate. You never never never ever ever wear a hat to a proper indoor table. You can get away with it on some alfresco occasions, but not many. I really don’t care if it is tradition in the Southwest to wear your cowboy hat at the dining table. You don’t see President Bush wearing his to a state dinner.

Secondly, there is absolutely nothing more revolting than a man dining anywhere but on South Beach wearing a strappy-t-shirt or one of those absurd looking weight-lifting shirts. I have news for you. Your under-arm hair just isn’t all that attractive to me. Do you really think it is sexy? Your glistening biceps might look mediocre in the gym, but they are repulsive to look at during a meal. It really isn’t conducive to fine dining. Less is definitely not more. If it didn’t work for Brad Pitt when he was all hunked up for Troy, it won’t work for Joe Blow.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for sj-reidhead

Article Author: SJ Reidhead

SJ Reidhead is the author of two western novels, and several non-fiction books about Tombstone and Wyatt Earp. She blogs at The Pink Flamingo. While she is highly critical of the influence of far right conservatives on her beloved Republican Party, …

Visit SJ Reidhead's author pageSJ Reidhead's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Elvira Black

    Oct 12, 2006 at 10:06 am

    What a great piece! Witty and right-on.

  • 2 - Christopher Rose

    Oct 12, 2006 at 10:43 am

    I thought double dipping was a dance move?

  • 3 - duane

    Oct 12, 2006 at 12:28 pm

    This double dipping thing appears to be a high-priority issue. So, I'm wondering whay exactly you mean. Of course, only a knuckledragger or an unsupervised child or a Costanza will double dip from a bowl of dip that is intended for general consumption. But let's say I have some guacamole on my plate of Mexican food. I hope it's not uncouth to double dip using my own tortilla chips and dip. If it is, then I don't get it. What's the problem?

  • 4 - duane

    Oct 12, 2006 at 12:30 pm

    whay --> what

    Sorry. I think spelling errors are uncouth. Similar Mom history in that respect.

  • 5 - SJ Reidhead

    Oct 12, 2006 at 2:47 pm

    Thank you for the comments. I have a feeling a manners redux will soon appear!

  • 6 - gonzo marx

    Oct 12, 2006 at 3:02 pm

    a very interesting Article...

    it's fascinating to poke around with the anthropological origins of "manners" and ettiquette

    most delving into the subject indicates an Origin in armed societies, where offending an Individual could get you killed

    examples are the old West in the US and the highly structed formss of social ettiquette of feudal Japan, as well as the structures of manners originating in medieval Europe

    in US culture, one can almost track precisely the decline in manners and simple polite behavior with the removal or immediate cpersonal consequence

    when i was younger, if some man was rude or impolite to a woman, he stood a good risk of a punch in the snoot from a bystander, the probability approaching certainty if the woman was escorted by a man herself... but even a stranger would stand up to challenge the rude behavior

    now, that punchin the snoot could possibly get the "rescuer" sued, if not outright jailed

    just a Thought...

    Excelsior?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 10, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs