Home / Star Trek on Television

Star Trek on Television

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

For the first time in nearly 20 years, we are living in a time without Star Trek. No movies are planned and no series are currently in production. Some Trek fans are still fighting to bring Enterprise back but honestly, Star Trek has been slowly dying since The Next Generation went off the air in ’94 and Enterprise was like seeing TNG after it had suffered a stroke. We should be glad it’s out of its misery and hope that one day it will be resurrected. Until that day comes though, we should honor the good days we had with Star Trek. Do that on your own time though, because right now I am here to piss on its grave. Join me as I explain, series-by-series, the inevitable downfall of Star Trek.

Star Trek: The Next Generation

Let me start at the highest point in Trek’s life. The Next Generation was the Golden Age of Star Trek. Some will argue that the original series is better. Those people, however, cannot debate me because their loyalty to their first generation IBM computers prevents them from logging on to the Internet. TNG took everything good about the original series, improved upon it, and delivered it in a sleeker package.

Those who would argue that the clunky charm of the original is what makes it better, I have to advise you to call your doctor. Chances are that your cell phone from 1985, that’s the size of a small dog, has probably given you a brain tumor. Here you can borrow my RAZR phone. Okay, I’m just kidding…I can’t afford a RAZR. Seriously though, call your doctor.

I love the original series. I just can’t stand it when people argue something is better simply because they are loyal to what came first.

Now what made TNG so good? If I had to give a one-sentence answer I would say that it struck the perfect balance between the exploration-of-the-unknown plots and galactic politics to create an engaging universe that was both exciting and wholly immersive. If I had to give a thirty-seven sentence answer I’d say the show’s success was due in large part to…

The Crew

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usCap’n Picard – It has nothing to do with my man-crush for him. Picard was a shiny dome of wisdom and charisma. He commanded his crew with strength and understanding and a strong English brogue. He shows that while his resolve is strong, he is also very vulnerable and you want to be the one to cradle his head in your lap and show him that you won’t take advantage of that vulnerability. Hang on; I need to take my medication.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usRiker – Riker was there for one purpose and one purpose only, to serve the role of the campy panty-chaser that Kirk served in the original. Picard was so highly evolved he wasn’t even sexually compatible with other humans anymore so Riker would be the one to engage with the horny females of all the cultures they encountered this time around. It’s a tough job but someone has to do it. That’s why he’s Number One.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usData – If you are reading this article it is for one of two reasons. You are either or a Star Trek fan or you are being forced to read this sometime long after I am dead as some form of bizarre corporal punishment of the future. If the reason is the former, do you remember the first time you saw a Next Gen. episode where Brent Spiner got to act with emotion, either because Data was instilled with emotions, or it was an episode with his evil twin brother Lore? Remember how much your mind was completely blown to see the guy who plays Data act so differently from the pragmatic android friend we’d all come to adore? That just proves how great he was in that role, and we reaped all the benefits.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usGeordie LaForge – The stereotypical blind black guy, except he wasn’t 70 years old, missing all his teeth, and singing blues in a rocking chair out in the street. I liked Geordie, even though he was mostly there to give Data someone to ask his comical childlike questions about humanity to. He was also there to save the warp core from breaching every other episode, which I guess was equally as important.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usWorf – In the first season, Worf acted like a stupid ape and would sometimes make a flying leap at the view screen to attack an enemy ship. After many Klingons wrote in saying how racist this was, the writers modified the role. Worf ended up being a very well developed character who gave the writers a window for us to peer into the Klingon culture. He also taught us about honor. Man, the babies I would have kicked if I didn’t have Worf as a role model.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usDeanna Troi – Was it standard to have a therapist on the bridge who sat right next to the captain or is that only if she is a telepath? You would have toked up too if you constantly had your shrink with you psychoanalyzing your every move.

Fun Fact: the Enterprise’s computer logs show that Funyuns were ordered on a number of occasions from the Captain’s personal replicator.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usDr. Crusher – Honestly the female roles in Star Trek were never very strong ones. I swear, I am not sexist! It’s the writers who are sexist. They are the ones that made Crusher and Troi flat, uninteresting characters. I also blame Crusher for birthing…

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usWesley – Man, he was an annoying snot sometimes, always saving the ship like he’s some kind of genius. The best part about Wesley was we got to see Picard scold him from time to time.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usTasha Yar – She sucked. (I’m not sexist!) The only reason I bring her up is because they killed her off early on, showing that the writers were smart enough to use the tried and true formula of killing-off-the-chick-who-can’t-act. Actually, I have heard it was HER decision to leave. Why, you ask? To pursue her acting career! And we all thought Worf had the biggest head on the bridge.

The best part about the crew is that while they were all good, well developed characters (with a few exceptions), they were actually greater than the sum of their parts. The writers always gave each character their time on the screen, and really conveyed a sense of a team depending on one another. This was a quite a juggling act that was not able to be recreated in future series.

The Trek

The dilemmas they faced on TNG were a good balance of interracial disputes, space anomalies, and socially significant crisis. Because the Enterprise was on a mission of exploration, while still being part of the fleet that could be called back in times of war, the stories had plenty of different directions they could go so that it never got tedious. The solutions to the problems they were derived from a good balance of intellectual debate and techno babble and while it involved a good deal of BS, it was feasible BS.

So in the end, TNG success was all based on balance, the exact opposite of what you think when you look at that top-heavy starship.

Star Trek: Deep Space Nine

DS9 shared the same setting with TNG. It even gained two characters we knew from the latter: Worf and Chief O’Brien, which helped with the withdrawal from TNG going off the air. Overall, DS9 was a really good show. It was well written and had memorable characters. Odo and Quark were probably the best of the series. As far as immersion goes, this series probably sucked you into the Trek universe even more so than TNG did.

So what’s missing from DS9? I’ll tell you: “To boldly go where no one has gone before”

In this series they boldly stayed where no one had stayed before, and sometimes interesting shit would happen to them on the station. But nothing can make up for taking away the key component of exploration that had always been present in Star Trek before.

The series was good in its own right but just didn’t satisfy the same needs that TNG did.

I’m not going to go into as much detail with this series as I do with the rest as I was not attached to it enough to be dripping with praise, nor was there anything terrible enough about it that would let me have fun bashing it. That’s what Voyager is for.

Star Trek: Voyager

Boldly trying to get the hell back from where no one has been before.

In the case of Voyager, we were given back the exploration factor, at the expense of everything else. What we lost were good characters, the familiar setting, and an all around feeling of non-suck.

Because this series takes place in the far-off and uncharted Delta Quadrant, we lose the immersion that came with an established setting: all the familiar races and politics are left way back in the Alpha Quadrant and we have to settle for whatever new races they come up with to inhabit this area of space. When this happens there is always potential to win us over again with equally compelling material, but that certainly didn’t happen. That’s why they ended up having to play the Borg card for the last four seasons. But what made this the weakest series is the same thing that made TNG the strongest…

The Crew
Image Hosted by ImageShack.usJaneway – The largest concentration of suck was Captain Kathryn Janeway. None of the characters on Voyager were terribly interesting, but Janeway must have had a serious rash in her nether crevice to pull some of the shit she did. In what must have been an effort to make Janeway “ballsy”, Voyager’s writers made her downright reckless.

The most annoying aspect is how she blatantly ignored the prime directive, along with what have to be some second and third directives, for no real reason, and then she takes the rules sooo seriously when it serves the plot (usually to keep them from using some quick method to get home). In a way, it would have been fun to have a captain who just completely went rogue and threw away the Starfleet handbook.

Give her an eye patch! Have her trade her Starfleet insignia for a skull-adorned scepter! Or if they don’t want to go that route, then make her a straight-up rule junkie. Just be consistent about it. This is just one of the many symptoms of weak writing that are rampant in the series.

Female Trek fans may have rejoiced to finally see a woman in the captain’s chair. The problem is Janeway is hardly a good representation of women, being a chain-smoking maneater that she is. It’s actually insulting to women that they felt Janeway had to be tough-as-nails in order to lead. Can captains not be feminine? Kira from DS9 was a much better representation of a woman in command.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usChakotay – First Officer and an American Indian…and that’s it. Seriously, the writers never got around to giving him any more depth than that. Oh, he tried to help Janeway relax by helping her find her animal guide. Personally, I think Picard found a better way to relax.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usThe Doctor – One of the more interesting characters is the holographic doctor. Of course, once the producers found out that audiences liked him, they oversaturated the show with stories focused around him and we quickly got tired of him.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usNeelix – I can understand having Neelix be the official “guide through the Delta Quadrant” since he’s friggen from there. Hell, if I was him and didn’t get the job, I would have torched the place. But then they made him the head chef. Why would you put the one person whose culture is guaranteed to be the farthest removed from your own in charge of making your meals? Something tells me they paid for that little mistake with lots and lots of Talaxian eyeball soup. Oh, and Neelix is annoying as shit. If this guy is supposed to be the comic relief, I’d rather take my chances with a Wayans brother.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usTuvok – A black Vulcan? Sorry, but I just don’t buy that this alien race evolved into sub-races equivalent to humans. The Vulcans were always space elves! They lived longer than us, had pointy ears, and kept to themselves. Didn’t you see Lord of the Rings? I know I did, and I read all the books based on the movies and not once was there a black elf. Even if I could overlook this racial anomaly, Tuvok didn’t even act like a Vulcan. Vulcans are supposed to be stoic, not consistently annoyed. I swear, his brow was furrowed so often, a family of possums could have taken up nest in the creases of his forehead.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usB’Elanna Torres – Former Marquise and Chief Engineer of Voyager. I know if I was the Captain, I would immediately put a traitor to the Federation in charge of my warp core. Seriously though, Torres was one of the more tolerable characters. She was also perpetually annoyed but she was half-Klingon…and a woman, so that made sense. (I’m not sexist!)

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usTom Paris – He was supposed to be the bad boy pilot of the ship, but like everything else they started, the writers forgot about that aspect of his character. He was still the pilot…but he was a chump. All his character development was done through conversation with his buddy Harry, but they always talked about boring shit that I wouldn’t want to listen to if it was my friend talking directly to my face. And in that case I would let him know he was being boring by kicking him in the face, because that’s what friend are for. I think Tom might have been gay for Harry.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usHarry Kim – He was there solely for us to feel sorry for him. He couldn’t really do anything right and he always wanted to get with chicks he had no chance with. Also, is gay for Tom.

Kes – She was some sort of telepath that they killed off after the first few seasons. Sadly, even evoking the kill-off-the-chick-who-can’t-act formula couldn’t save the show.

Overall, most members of the crew were just not worth caring about, and the few characters that were interesting were overplayed, i.e. The Doctor, Seven of Nine. The writers certainly did not do a good job of giving all the characters their time on the screen, but I might be grateful for that because the little bit of character development I did get from them, I didn’t like.

Wasted Potential

Voyager is probably best described as a lot of good ideas wasted. The idea of a crew of Starfleet officers having to combine with a renegade Marquise crew to survive together in unfamiliar space is very intriguing. It’s too bad that after the first 5 episodes, the crew just acts like they are the fucking Brady Bunch. Sure, Chakotay debates Janeway here and there, but no more than Riker did with Picard (and she deserved to be debated way more).

The concept of a stranded Federation ship fighting to survive in unknown space had great potential; constantly running low on supplies, having to improvise at every turn, and negotiate trades with hostile races. But things never really got very desperate and the crew hardly ever talked about how far away from home they were. There never seemed to be any real threat of running out of resources.

I would have been a nice touch to at least have the bridge lit dimmer than what is standard to show they are at least trying to be conservative, and it would help to hide Janeway’s Burt Reynolds mustache. The way it was though, the audience could almost forget what their situation was. The conflicts that arose were always viruses or malfunctions or anomalies, all creating problems that were completely episodic. These kinds of plots worked fine for TNG where the whole point was to bumble around exploring and which had a cast that we actually cared about, but Voyager was presented to us as a different sort of show.

Maybe Voyager would become notorious and be constantly hunted by the enemies it makes along the way, and in turn they must make allies in order to survive in that crazy, crazy quadrant. It just didn’t evolve like that. Each episode became built around some completely random problem, and kept us from ever really getting familiar with life in the Delta Quadrant. Freak transporter accidents that cause Neelix and Tuvok to merge into one entity doesn’t have shit to do with the crew’s ongoing struggle.

And if I see one more Star Trek episode about an alien entity that screws with the crew’s libidos, or plays on their deepest fears, or makes them all think that the rest of the crew are giant lobster people that feed on underwear, I swear to God I will shred my Patrick Stewart blow-up doll. There were a few alien races and antagonists that had reoccurring roles throughout the series but nothing ever seemed connected to anything else, which left the setting lifeless and unconvincing.

When Voyager first ran, viewers knew they were watching shit dry on a wall. That’s why ratings started plummeting. The show was only saved from cancellation because of two reasons, and here they are:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usExhibit A and B, which both happen to be Cs.

Go ahead and look up the numbers. There was a direct correlation between the increased ratings and the introduction of Seven of Nine on the show. Now, I will concede that it wasn’t only her breasts that brought new viewers to the show. It was also the padded suit she wore to make her breasts look bigger.

Star Trek: Enterprise

The Prequel: Boldly…doing boring shit I don’t care about!

The whole point of having a Star Trek prequel is to treat Trek fans with back-story to the things we are familiar with. Enterprise did some of that, but it got completely preoccupied with things that just bastardized the Star Trek history we had come to know, introducing new races like the Xindi and Suliban. If I wanted to watch a bunch of unfamiliar races blow up humans I’ll watch Babylon 5.

The other problem is Enterprise was the first Star Trek that started operating in story arcs that spanned multiple episodes. This is what we needed in Voyager! Here it just makes me lose interest faster because if I don’t care for the plot of a certain episode, I need to wait half a season before that damn plot gets resolved. And then we have a time cop come back from the thirtieth century to tell Archer that he needs his help fighting some Temporal Cold War? Fuck that! Show me the origin of Tribbles!

The series was most successful when it played off existing Trek material, the best story arc being the one where Arik Soong (ancestor of the scientist who created Data, also played by Brent Spiner) led a band of augments (the bad dudes we know from The Wrath of Khan). The episodes featuring the Andorians (blue-skinned aliens with white antennae) were good too, because we could relate to it. Trek fans eat that shit up. Stop trying to win us over with new races and galaxy-wide crisis that we strangely never here about again in all the series set in the future. I ain’t buying it.

The Crew

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usArcher – The captain of the Enterprise. Is it just me or is Scott Bakula just not a very good actor? Whenever he was saying something important he just looked like he was trying really hard to put on his “serious face.” “I’m really angry now. Can’t you tell by the way I am squinting my eyes?” He probably would have come off better if he had just mellowed out, but he didn’t want to use his Starfleet-issued space Marijuana because of the risks of hair loss.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

This show revolved too much around Archer. Instead of holding an officer meeting and asking for solutions to a problem, it seemed like Archer would always cook up an elaborate plan and then ask his people if they could pull it off. That’s not a problem so much with this character specifically as it is just a symptom of poor scriptwriting.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usT’pol – Vulcan first officer of the Enterprise. I shall call her Seven of Nine 2.0. The booby strategy saved them the last time, but this time a curvy woman in a skintight jumpsuit just wasn’t enough, and audiences saw right through it…the strategy, not the jumpsuit.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usPhlox, The Doctor – Probably the most interesting character on the series. He was a bit reminiscent of Neelix from Voyager, but not so much so that I wanted to drive a nail through his head.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usMalcom Reed – Security Officer. British. Boring.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usCharles “Trip” Tucker – Engineer. Southern. Boring.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usHoshi, The Communications Officer – The Uhura of her time, except less black… and more Asian. Oh, and she’s boring.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.usTravis Mayweather – Who? Oh right, he was the young black pilot guy. Out of a batch full of unmemorable characters, he’s still hardly worth mentioning.

Did I just not give these characters a chance or was I not given a chance? With the show being more action based than previous Star Treks and with so much of it revolving around Archer, there was very little room for any character development. Unfortunately, the action wasn’t enough to win me over, and since it was the first Trek to be cancelled since the original series I would say that I was not alone.

Enterprise was the first Trek series that actually started its run without the “Star Trek” in its name. I think this was done in order to attract a wider audience who didn’t feel Star Trek was accessible to them. This was stupid. Nobody is going to look at this show and not know it’s a Star Trek series. The only thing that dropping the name did was make loyal fans feel betrayed.

A shark that writes “I’m just a friendly whale, come swim in my mouth” on his side is not going to fool anyone. He is just going to get beat up by the other sharks, who are easily insulted. “What? You don’t wanna be a shark no more? We ain’t good enough for you?” Sharks are a lot like the Mafia. No, I didn’t steal this from A Shark’s Tale. It’s just the truth. Plus that movie sucked…even more than Enterprise.


So, what have we learned? Star Trek was its strongest in TNG when it had a great cast of characters and feasible plots that took place in an immersive setting. It lost some of its steam in DS9, when the plots all became centered on a non-moving space station. Then Trek took a nose dive when it couldn’t maintain good characters, feasible plots, or an immersive setting in Voyager and we didn’t get much better out of Enterprise.

The Future…of the Future

Will we ever see another Star Trek series? Or even a movie? I’m sure we will. We just need to give the soil time to rest, and for some new creative blood to come along. Many Trek fans have blamed Rick Berman and Brannon Braga for the declining quality of the franchise. I reserve judgment since we, as outsiders, can’t know who made what decisions along the way, and what other factors effect the outcome of a show.

I do know that Braga has decided to no longer contribute to any future Treks and that is probably for the best. Room has been made for new creative talent to come along, and once we are ready to all take Star Trek back into our homes, I’m sure we’ll find ourselves back on the bridge of a starship again. Until that time though…

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

New Star Trek feature film under the helm of J.J. Abrams announced.

Powered by

About NB

  • Nick, you left one name out of this whole mess of a review – Roddenberry. When Gene Roddenbery died, so did the series. The creative vision behind the concept was gone. You could have saved yourself a whole load of paragraphs by writing that one sentence. The more I read your review, the more obvious it became to me.

    I do not have any trouble blaming Berman for the fate of the series – though my family left the States before the last forgettable series hit the airwaves.

    That was one long piss you took on the Star Trek mausoleum. I hope your kidneys felt relieved afterwards.

  • I hven’t read the whole thing, but I will say that the last 3-4 years of DS9 were excellent, and the last season of Enterprise is stands as one of the finest of any Trek series.

    There have been rumblings of another film early in the concept phase….

  • I agree Chris. I did give props to DS9. And I believe the few positive episodes from Enterprise I mentioned were from the last season, so I think we are on the same page.

  • I don’t have a cell phone. I also don’t have a brain tumor, as far as I know.

    I do have a computer, however, and I can log onto the internet… so I’m taking this opportunity to say that the Star Trek original series is better than The Next Generation. Much better.


  • Stephen..Stevie…Steve…Aren’t you at least going to tell me why you think the original is better? Is it the camp factor? I like it too but when I try to be objective about it, I don’t see how it can be considered better than TNG in quality.

  • B J

    Watching Star Trek’s various versions, I can’t help that as I got older I became more critical of TV in general or merely tired of seeing the same old characters get out of the same problems time and again. Kirk talks down a galactic doomsday machine (a role made for Shatner, who leaves me rolling on the floor every time he lets you in on the joke; Picard is ingested by the baddest force in the universe, outwits them, returns to the Enterprise (perhaps he never knew the difference given character development) hardly worse for the wear; Hawk shaved his head and had potential to be the one member of Starfleet who’s willing to tell any and all potential enemies to bring it on. And so on.

    While sci-fi was growing up (Bab 5, Gallactica), Star Trek stayed true to a future that, if you look around yourself today in the real world, seems as out of date as flower power.

  • Nicholas, as you point out how important the “captain” is, there was never anyone like James Tiberius Kirk in the franchise.

    Either the actor wanted to be like Kirk (Bakula as Archer seemed to be trying) or you get the other end and he/she tried to be the anti-Kirk (Stewart’s Picard is most obvious).

    Either way, despite the clunky sets, poor special effects, and Spock’s plastic ears, I still believe that nothing else in the franchise came close to the original.

    Live long and prosper!

  • RogerMDillon

    “For the first time in nearly 20 years, we are living in a time without Star Trek.”

    Amazing that a high-tech guy like yourself doesn’t have cable. TNG & DS9 are on Spike, TOS is on G4 and Enterprise is syndicated. Although you proably get too tired from always having to get off the couch to change stations.

    This extensive write-up could have been better served without the cool, conceited attitude that missteps with lame jokes as often as it succeeds.

  • Victor: I watched a number of original series episodes on DVD and I felt I was looking past the special effects and clucky sets, but still through TNG had better, more complex plots for the most part.

    Roger: I actually watch the reruns on all the cable networks. I was implying that we are without any “new” Star Trek. Also, I’m glad you liked half my jokes! 😉

  • Roddenberry’s wife contributed a lot after Gene’s death.

    I think Star Trek is more about the human condition and DS9 was able to capture one section of the human condition that neither the OS or TNG explored too much: war. In current times, we might have needed that.

  • Yar Fan

    The one thing that Enterprise did well was Season Three, with the all-season-long story arc.

    I came in half-way through Season Three — essentially gave up on Enterprise in Year One ‘cos I missed the 23rd Century — and then simply had to know “what had gone before” – so downloaded the preceding episodes via BitTorrent. Even got my 11 year old son interested in watching it.

    ‘Course, to make an extended story arc really work, you do need to offer past eps (legally) via Video On Demand. Hurry up, Paramount.

  • What I liked about the original series was it had a sense of humor. It was sexist, but that was true for most series at that time.

    Now, TNG had no excuse. The only active, thinking woman was killed off. She was also humorless as the captain. I did like Jordie and Data.

    Didn’t see much of Voyager, but at least they had a strong female figure, Janeway, and a central one at that. She was much more human and interesting than the asexual Picard.

  • I was very fond of DS9 and was really sorry to see it end. The characters were much more nuanced than most other characters in the Trek-verse – more shades of grey to them, I think. The characters in the other series all seemed to wear black hats or white hats, but in DS9 they seemed much more like fully-realized people.

  • Purple Tigress: Asexual like a fox!

  • I really enjoyed this article. I don’t agree with all your opinions, but it was entertaining to read and cracked me up in spots. (The repeated smokin’-Picard pic for example). You have to expect criticism – people are crazy-passionate about their Trek.
    Anyone checked out New Voyages?

  • David Ellis

    Enterprise was the first Star Trek series to do multiple episode story arcs? What about the whole six episode arc where the Dominion took over Deep Space Nine? And the what was it? 9 episode arc that finished the series, I believe the standing still aspect made DS9 the most dramatically satisfying Star Trek series and will remain my favourite, though I do hold a soft spot for Data, even if he was a Spock rip-off.

  • I know I liked the original Star Trek the best for its interaction between characters. I feel we got to know them well. Personally, I felt a distance to some of the cast members in the other incarnations. Maybe this is very telling, but I think Data was probably the character I cared about most from any other version.

    Still, the original holds for me and I still love:

    1. The Kirk leer (looking at a woman)
    2. Kirk calling McCoy “Bones”
    3. Kirk when he had a chance to be bad Kirk
    4. Spock when he was happy to see Kirk alive and called him “Jim”
    5. Bones when he was drunk on love on the fantasy planet
    6. Scotty when he outdrank the alien
    7. Sulu when he went nutso with a sword
    8. Checkov when he was defending mother Russia
    9. All the sexy alien girls who went for Kirk

    And my favorite all time moment:

    When Kirk kissed Uhura (that took *&^%$ in the 1960s). God bless Gene Roddenberry!

  • Yeah the original does deserve praise. The main point of the article though was to show the declining quality from when it was most popular, and that was during The Next Generation. I can understand if some are disappointed that I paid no tribute to the original but my piece was long as it is, and the original series was disconnected from the rest of them, which all ran one right after the other.
    Also, I am glad I gave people an opportunity to reminisce.

  • Haha, I love how the news of a JJ Abrams directed Star Trek 11 is released the DAY after I write this. Its like Star Trek saw me pissing on its grave, rose like a zombie, and kicked my ass! We shall see if audiences can stomach younger actors portraying the sacred Spock and Kirk.

  • Nicholas, I really enjoyed your article. When it all comes down to it, you hit the nail right on the head. What ever happened to Nicholas Meyer directing Trek movies? He was good. And I don’t think that avid Trekkies will be able to take new people portraying Spock and Kirk.

  • I agree with Victor.

    And I won’t even pretend to understand Bowman’s comment.

    Personally, I thought it was a shame that they covered up the eyes of the sexiest male crew member. But he was a two-fer–handicapped AND ethnic.

  • Star Trek XI… I thought maybe you were kidding, but then I found the info below online… I can’t see how this movie could be anything but a total disaster… the fact that it’s being directed by the guy who created “Lost” and “Alias” sure doesn’t give me much hope… but who knows…

    “J.J. Abrams has signed up to direct the next film in the Star Trek franchise.
    The eleventh film in the series will focus on the formative years of James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock at Starfleet Academy, according to Variety. There is currently no word on who might play the characters made famous by William Shatner and Leonard Nimoy.
    With his hugely popular creations Lost and Alias gathering a cult following and Mission: Impossible III receiving high praise from critics prior to its release, it may be that Abrams will breathe new life into the franchise. However, some fans may be unenthusiastic about the storyline exploring old ground.
    Abrams will be joined by fellow Lost producers Damon Lindelof and Bryan Burk on the project, whilst his M:i:III writers Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci will pen the script with him.
    Paramount are aiming for a 2008 release.”

  • They did it with Star Wars. It was only a matter of time before it happened with Star Trek.

  • As long as it’s going to be a disaster anyway, they should let Shatner write and direct it instead. At least it would be more entertaining…

  • “Enterprise” and “DS9” are the major illustration of what went wrong with the “Star Trek” franchise. Rick Berman & Brannon Braga had nothing to do with the day to day production of “DS9” and I’m prepared to contend that it was the best of the Trek series even if it didn’t have the qualities you liked. Berman and Braga were in control of the first two and a half season of “Enterprise” and if the show had been cancelled after the second season no one would have been disappointed. The last half of the thrid season and the entire fourth season except for the series finally were run by Manny Cotto. Those episodes are regarded as the best of the series. But the series finale – the one with Troi and Riker – was one of the worst episodes of any version of Star Trek ever and it was written by Berman and Braga. Draw your own conclusions.

  • I never thought of it the way Purple said it, but why didn’t Geordi have one leg or something? I always found that visor over his eyes disturbing.

    Anyway, I understand you put a great deal into this post, Nicholas. The original series would be an interesting follow-up for you. What do you think?

    Anyway, I should say I enjoyed your post very much!

    Live long and prosper!

  • Right the article is a conmplete piece of garbage

    TOS = sucked but the films were good
    TNG = Very good in all aspects
    DS9 = Good but boring at times
    VGR = My fav series, seriously get a grip voager was by far the best series and wth id wrong with janeway bein the way she is?
    ENT = havent seen all of it but from what i saw its a pretty lame series
    Movies = liked them all

    The future of startrek = we already know there is a 11th Movie coming up in 2008 and there has been a lot of speculation lately that it could be a pilot to a new series. I will stay forever a star trek fan as its my 2nd favourite series after Star Gate.

  • There really ought not to be any problems developing new series out of Star Trek.

    One obvious story arc that’s desperately in need of developing is that of the Romulans. There is relatively little known about them and they had weird futuristic clothes and hair like nerd goths or something!

    The Ferengi are another fun species that could be turned into a great series. The Ferengi at home would be fun too!

  • I liked Voyager. It was the best of the franchise, imho. (Well, I hated Neelix and Kes, and some of the time travel stuff was lame, but generally I enjoyed watching it.) I think that TNG has not held up well over the years. The few episodes of TNG I’ve watched recently seem dated. Maybe it’s the hair. I never really watched DS9 (if they had gotten rid of Quark, maybe it would have been worth watching). Enterprise was just too boring. Nothing was happening in any given episode. And don’t even get me started on the finale with Riker and Troi. That was way lame. I do like the movies, except for the search for God (#4? or #6? I can’t remember). “Wrath of Khan” is my favorite.

  • ECM

    I think Rick Berman is at fault for the state of Star Trek, what a crappy producer.

    Rather than list all the reasons, I will direct you to GeeksOn.com – Ep.63 11/14/06

    (look in the show archive)

    Listen to this episode, and during the interview the truth is revealed.

  • SST

    100% True… TOS & TNG ruled. 7 of 9 kept Voyager on. DS9 didn’t have enough good episodes (Armin S. told me they didn’t want to dish out the $) Enterprise started OK but screwed the Timeline until the last season…Too Late. Star Trek XI…Shatner now in as well as George Takei. A wait & see, my bet is – it scores. A TV animation in the Works.

  • Matthew

    First off, TNG….man, that bridge was like someone’s lounge. All 90’s touchy feely with a ship’s counselor to boot. Apart from having that fine English thesp in the main role, PS, and Data…who doesn’t love Data…it sucked big time. I put to you what you have put to fans of the original – I don’t know your age but I reckon it’s a safe bet you weren’t around when it was made. So you prefer TNG not because it came 1st, but because it’s what YOU grew up with. You obviously can’t see past the technical limitations of TOS, otherwise your eyes would open to the fact it is better in all ways but production values. When put to neutrals, DS9 is often voted best written, produced and performed. They don’t have the baggage we fans have, and I reckon it’s a safe bet that they’re right. I loved DS9. I don’t have a favourite, though. I have liked all incarnations at some point. Even VOY and ENT had their moments, TNG had a small few, too. Oh, and Tuvok was the best Vulcan ever bar one. THE best was Nimoy – when I read your Tuvok comments, I was happy, as I didn’t have to take you seriously after reading that. He made a largely crapass show worth watching (along with the Doctor & Seven). Oh, and in JJ we trust. STXI is in safe hands.

  • blackmountainman

    Black people are a pure race not a ‘sub race’. White scientists have proven who ‘evolved’ from who. I trust you didn’t mean anything when you critiqued Tuvok, but I noticed that you did not evoke race when you critiqued Worf, probably because in real life he is more of a Shakespearean type of actor.

  • NB

    To blackmountainman: I didn’t refer to black people specifically as a sub-race. I said I thought it was a stretch that an alien race would divide into the same sub-races. I was referring to all races as sub-races, equally. Not one sub to another.
    As far as Worf goes, I never thought of him as a black Klingon but a black actor playing a darker klingon. Because Klingons involve so much more makeup, it masks all the other features that make someone look white, black, or any other race, leaving only a darker skin color, and I could easily believe alien races had varied skin tone.

  • Tom Banyon

    You want to know what was better about he original series? It was the stories. Jeez, they were plagarized enough in the Next Gen, that even you should admit that. Another thing, the cast. There were just too many characters in Next Gen. The bridge looked like the lounge of the “Love Boat” when they were all hanging around there. The heavy fantasy aspect of the original series was truer to real science fiction that the technobabble laden Federation baggage that Next Gen seemed to live for. Lastly, the overbearing political correctness of TNG. Jeez Louise, a female Security head? The angst and worry over destroying the life of a “Snowflake” or sentient machine? No, TNG does not hold up well.

  • Tuvok

    Yeah, personal attacks aren’t allowed, yet that’s what the writer of this blog did to the writers of StarTrek Voyager, and it’s characters. Not to mention the people that were actual fans of the show. [Personal attack deleted by Comments Editor]