To Marc Ecko And Those Who Voted On The Fate of Bonds' 756th Home Run Ball

Part of: The NUBIANO Exchange

This article is part of a series in celebration of a new, dynamic voice in Black America: the NUBIANO Exchange. Brace yourself for the NUBIANO experience. 

  by Clayton Perry

There is a certain joy and anguish that sports fans feel whenever a sacred record is broken. Without a doubt, certain records have been untouched so long that they are considered "holy grail" — an accomplishment to be made only by hard-working, dedicated players, as a tribute to the fans, after years of personal struggle and tremendous performance.

As with all things, the stability of such records are completely unpredictable and it is hoped (and expected) that, whenever a "great" of the past is out-shined by a newer talent, the achievement of the new record-holder will serve as a tribute to their predecessor's memory and legacy, have an air of "purity" and also garner widespread, positive attention — all while bringing new fans to the sport.

That was the hope that many expressed, as Barry Bonds hit his 756th home run — a historic feat that smashed a 33-year record by Hank Aaron. Instead of receiving widespread adoration and adulation, sports fans saw, for the first time in modern sports history, a player's legacy bought, slandered, and put on public display, for the ages, at the price of $752,467 — a mere fraction of the $150 million that Bonds made over the course of his career.

While Bonds run to the top may be far from pristine, the fact of the matter is this: he reached the summit and, despite widespread criticism, the league has honored this achievement and has not found it right (or necessary) to publicly condemn him. With that being said, Bonds will always maintain his spot in sports history, as the league's all-time home run hitter, until another, fresher face "takes the cake" and replaces his name.

Understanding that fact, Marc Ecko, a fashion designer with no real love or ties to major league baseball, found it necessary to take Barry Bonds' moment in the sun and reprimand him — using his own personal politics and financial reserves to tinker with historical record underneath the guise of a "public debate" in an online forum. And ultimately, since Barry Bonds left an historic mark that can not be erased, it was determined by Marc Ecko, at all costs, to taint Bonds' record, since steroid tests and the BALCO case could not do the job. (Side note: For the record, Bonds has never failed a steroid test and has never been charged with perjury or indicted for his testimony in the BALCO case.)

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for clayton-perry

Article Author: Clayton Perry

Clayton Perry's mission parallels that of John Hope Franklin, Marcus Garvey and Carter G. Woodson. As the founder of the NUBIANO Project, Perry facilitates the design of projects that give voice to the Black diaspora, empower the Black community, …

Visit Clayton Perry's author pageClayton Perry's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Love Me, Hate Me: Barry Bonds and the Making of an Antihero Love Me, Hate Me: Barry Bonds and the Making of an Antihero

    No player in the history of baseball has left such an indelible mark on the game as San Francisco Giants outfielder Barry Bonds. In his twenty-year career, Bonds has amassed an unprecedented seven MVP ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Marcus

    Oct 01, 2007 at 3:48 pm

    Clayton, why do you feel the need to turn this incident into a racial struggle? It's foolish to let colors and paranoia take precedent over facts and evidence. The league has not determined innocence, but rather has chosen not to prove Bonds' guilt. Face it: Barry Bonds is a cheater, but so are Mark MacGuire and Rafael Palmiero -- it's just common sense. This is definitely not a racial issue. Don't try to make it one.

    Also, your "overzealous" use of "quotations" is a little "excessive".

    -Marcus H.

  • 2 - Honestly.

    Oct 01, 2007 at 8:26 pm

    This has absolutely nothing to do with race. You are grasping at straws - poorly I might add. The "conclusions" you reach are far fetched and illogical. I would take this article back to the drawing board.

  • 3 - Mary

    Oct 01, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    Clayton,
    I totally agree with you. And I'm white.

  • 4 - Sheldon

    Oct 02, 2007 at 3:46 am

    If we concede that Mark McGwire was a steroid cheat, yet celebrate his accomplishes without exception, then why should Bonds not be given the same adieu.

  • 5 - Brad Laidman

    Oct 02, 2007 at 8:44 am

    Rich people have always had the ability to purchase memorabilia and deface it or destroy it.

    I do agree though that the Hall of Fame should refuse to accept purposely defaced memorabilia whether Bonds used steroids or not, whether that is right or wrong, or if the record is legit or not.

    It would just be an inane thing for a museum to do

  • 6 - The Haze

    Oct 03, 2007 at 6:27 pm

    You could have at least tried not to be so transparent Mr. Perry. Is it because he's a great ballplayer or because another black mans image is being "oppressed" by some rich white man? "Freedom through Revolution"??? Is that the Nubiano experience?? I can't fri**in' wait to buy a ticket! SHEESH!!!

  • 7 - slit

    Aug 05, 2009 at 2:11 pm

    Think the same. Nice reply

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs