The Most Ingenious Way to Fix College Football - Page 2

So that's what I want the Big 10 to do. I want them to cheat. If we could go back in time, I would have Illinois lay down in that game in Columbus. In 2005, instead of having Penn State go 11-1 with a loss to Michigan, Michigan lays down and lets Penn State go 12-0. Michigan was 7-5 that year and had little to gain, while Penn State and the Big 10 had everything to lose. On down the line. The Big Ten should just fix their seasons over and over again.

Then, on someone's death bed, they have to out the whole league to the country. The media will be in a frenzy that the world hasn't seen since Barry Bonds was indicted for perjury and obstruction. The congressional hearings on steroids in baseball will seem like a complete joke. The Tim Donaghy scandal in the NBA won't even register on the same Richter scale. And you know what? The NCAA will be forced to look at the system they created based on subjective rankings of people who don't watch all the college football games and the computer statistics that run some teams up and some teams out in a ridiculous fashion every week.

And hopefully the only conclusion that they can possibly come up with is a playoff system. Although, who knows, maybe they wouldn't get it right. I think it is worth the risk anyway.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for craig-lyndall

Article Author: Craig Lyndall

Craig Lyndall writes about all things related to Cleveland sports for WaitingForNextYear.com.

Visit Craig Lyndall's author pageCraig Lyndall's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - nicolas

    Nov 18, 2007 at 11:13 am

    i like this conspiracy.

    except for the fact that conspiring one particular conference team to an undefeated record doesn't benefit the conference. i don't know if it's the entire sum, but definitely a very very large percentage of any bowl revenue goes to the school, not the conference.

    conspire to push Ohio State into the national title game instead of the Rose Bowl, and all you're doing is increasing the chunk of money that they'll re-invest in their athletic department (on top of the $108 million they already spend).

    that would only serve to re-establish the gap between the haves (Florida, LSU, Ohio State, Michigan, USC) and the have nots.

    Leave the system where it is, with all of the Big 12, Pac 10, SEC, Big 10, and ACC teams kicking the crap out of each other so that there is rarely a clear winner and the teams are so exhausted by the end of the regular season that it affects their performance in the bowl games. Then we can continue the push for a playoff system, I say.

  • 2 - Craig Lyndall

    Nov 18, 2007 at 11:59 am

    It does benefit the conference because they get two really high profile bowls instead of just one. If Ohio State beats Illinois then they go to the National Championship bowl and some OTHER big ten team still gets to go to the Rose Bowl.

  • 3 - Rob Stephens

    Nov 18, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    My understanding is that each Big 10 conference school going to a bowl game actually does split the bowl game earnings with the conference office and the other schools. The bowl game participant does get a large share of the money to account for their expenses for traveling to and from the game, but after consideration for such expenses, my understanding is the bowl pot is split equitably.

    Still, I wouldn't support purposely losing games, but the NCAA does need to change. A playoff is definitely needed with at least 4 teams, but more ideally at least 8. You can still have bowl games and a playoff. With a system of dispersed conferences and decentralized scheduling, it is difficult to pick just 2 teams deserving of competing for a national title in most years.

  • 4 - Mike

    Dec 01, 2007 at 10:38 am

    Why not try something a little more in line with using a back door to begin creation of a playoff system. We currently have the SEC, ACC, and Big 12 with championship games, while the Big East, Big 10 and Pac 10 don't. Get each of these conferences to 12 teams and create conference championship games. It puts us one step closer to a true champion.

    The second step woudl be easy, the 6 conference champions plus 2 at large teams could play a playoff. That should allow for all the teams that would have a realistic chance at winning a nationsl championship to play for it. Bowls could be continued as they are now, just rotate the lower tier bowls for the playoffs and the current BCS bowls rotate the final games in the series.

    Is it perfect, no. But I think if even the first step, 6 conference championship games, would take us a long way toward a true national champion.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs