Matt Walsh’s Question-Begging

ESPN.com’s Matt Fish has perhaps just broken the sports Watergate that could threaten the legitimacy of the New England Patriots’ dynasty.

Fish tracked down former Patriots video assistant Matt Walsh, who claims that he (possibly) has the goods on illegal videotaping practices which, by very nature of when Walsh worked for the Patriots (1996-2003), proceed SpyGate by years.

Whatever Walsh knows, though, he’s not telling; he has no motivation to. "I'll be honest with you,” Walsh told ESPN.com. “I can't really be guilted into anything," he said. "Maybe… you don't think I have a conscience because of the people I was exposed to and what they had me doing,” he continued, but “really, I just [have] no incentive to really talk to anybody, no reason to do it. For me, personally, I haven't really been able to see the gain in doing it."

But listen to Walsh’s words closely. At the surface Walsh claims he “has nothing to gain” from speaking out about New England’s videotaping practices during his 7-year stint with the Patriots. But read between the lines and it appears that Walsh is either (a) attempting to stir up the waters into a book/interview deal that would make a violation of his non-disclosure agreement with New England – which he claims would put his family, with its deep New England roots, in jeopardy, “worth his while” or (b) begging Senator Arlen Specter (PA), ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, to subpoena him to Capitol Hill to spill his guts, thereby “leaving him no choice” but to drop dime on his former employer.

If Walsh were truly concerned with maintaining an image of loyalty to his former employer, he wouldn’t have gone on the record with Fish and ESPN.com. Pictures of Walsh and his new life as an “assistant golf pro” wouldn’t appear in the article, and he wouldn’t say things like:

“There are lots of stories there. [New England Patriots director of football research Ernie Adams] told me stories of things they used to do in Cleveland [where Adams assisted Belichick with the Browns]."

Or: "If I had a reason to want to go public or tell a story, I could have done it before this even broke. I could have said everything rather than having [Eric] Mangini be the one to bring it out."

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for james-david-dickson

Article Author: James David Dickson

James David Dickson is the Collegiate Network Fellow at The American Spectator.

Visit James David Dickson's author pageJames David Dickson's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - willbrosy

    Feb 03, 2008 at 12:02 am

    Great insight into this whole situation. I reaaallly think both Belichick and the NFL are in some trouble here

  • 2 - John

    Feb 03, 2008 at 11:02 am

    Shut up and play ball.

  • 3 - Chris McVetta

    Feb 03, 2008 at 2:05 pm

    Trust me. Whatever Belichick and Friends (tm) did here in Cleveland with the Browns ...it didn't work!

  • 4 - El Bicho

    Feb 03, 2008 at 3:55 pm

    "a violation of his non-disclosure agreement with New England"

    If rules are being broken, I doubt the non-disclosure agreement is binding.

    Al Capone's Empty Vault was a television special that Rivera hosted the year before he got his own daytime talk show.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Dec 01, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs