Mark Teixeira and the Yankees Domination of the Free Agent Market - Page 3

The Yankees did not magically become the goliath that they are today. When CBS owned them, and was unwilling to invest in the team, the Yankees were beyond pitiful. It was not until an owner who — say what you will about his character — had an insatiable lust for winning, bought the team that the Yankees began the climb back to success. And even that climb, with all its financial backing — was rocky at times. Ask Don Mattingly or Dave Righetti.

George Steinbrenner turned a business he purchased for $10 million into a $1.3 billion enterprise (according to Forbes Magazine). That is the epitome of successful capitalism.

Instead of railing against the Yankees for intelligently and meticulously working to put the best team possible on the field every season, the organization should be examined as a model of how to run a successful sports franchise. The Yankees domination of the free agent market this season is perhaps the most easily solvable issue that baseball faces today. Teams must simply give the fans a product worth watching. If every ownership group was committed to that task, it would be amazing how quickly the term "small market" would become passé.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Dec 24, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    A few points of contention:

    • If the Yankees are the model for success, how come they haven't won a World Series in eight years? How come they've only won two pennants since? Two other teams have done that (Red Sox, Cardinals). Can they just fall back on the 90s and say they've won four of the last 13 championships, therefore they are successful? Yes, they've won lots of games and made the postseason several times, but the Cardinals, Red Sox, Athletics and Angels have also averaged over 90 wins since 2002.

    • Skepticism is all over this AJ Burnett signing. Remember when you said Jeremy Bonderman has been disappointing since he hasn't won more than 15 games in a season? Well Burnett has one 15-win season -- last year, when he went 18-10. The guy's been to the DL nine times this decade -- over three seasons of his life. Considering the Yankees just recently escaped the clutches of Zombie Carl Pavano ($10m/year) and saw the final years of $15m/year Kevin Brown up close, I can't find an argument that says signing Burnett was a smart decision.

    • Sabathia is, well, he's outstanding (6th in MVP voting? For a pitcher?) and he's in his prime. But a seven-year deal is probably the worst thing possible for one's motivation. Consider other 7+-year deals:

    Kevin Brown
    Mike Hampton
    Barry Zito

    John Donovan at SI did a good job of the hit-or-miss nature of long-term deals, and he set the long-term bar at four years. Seven years is an eternity, especially since those last three years constitutes a player option. Eep.

    The Teixeira signing I like, though. Other similar 7+-year deals seemed to work out (Alex Rodriguez, Jeter, Pujols, Helton). Soriano, Miguel Cabrera, and Ryan Braun also were locked up for eight years and they'll all be fine.

    But like you said, the pitching has been the problem. So the easiest path is to throw money at the problem, because in one year they can't develop the pitching staff that it took years for the 2008 Rays, the 2006 Tigers, the 2005 White Sox, or the 2003 Marlins to create. Guess it's better than the three-headed monster of Rasner-Kennedy-Hughes.

  • 2 - Tony

    Dec 24, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    I've missed our baseball debates Matt so here it goes. I'll go point by point.

    - On the Yankees recent world series drought: Winning a World Series is easily one of the hardest things to do in sports. The Yankees, over the course of their history, have won 26 Championships since their inception as the Highlanders in 1903. Obviously that means that even teams with Ruth and Gehrig, Dimaggio and Dickey, and Mantle and Maris did not win the World Series a good number of years. Success in baseball is determined by consistency year to year (as long as a few championships are sprinkled in). The Yankees also did not win WS titles from 1962 to 1977 and from 1978 to 1996. Every team has a drought, especially as a dynasty grows older, and diminished stars must be replaced.

    - On to AJ: While I am obviously worried about his health I am more confident in his success than even Sabathia. The comparison to Bonderman is unfounded as there is a big difference between the Central and East over the course off their careers. Ignoring his win totals for a second AJ has posted a career 1.284 whip for his career which is very good. He's also only walked 568 batters in 1376.3 innings. Finally he has given up 177.3 less hits than innings pitched. I believe these stats are much better indicators of his skill than his win loss record pitching for average to below average teams.

    - 7 years for Sabathia is probably too long but that is the nature of the game these days. If they didn't do it someone else would have, and they would have been out another star pitcher.

    - While you may perceive that the Yankees are simply throwing money at their pitching staff having two top line, homegrown starters is hardly not developing their pitching staff. There are few other teams in baseball that can boast home grown talents like Wang and Chamberlain in their starting rotation. Mixing youngsters with veterans is smart baseball, not a quick fix. Throwing Hughes and Kennedy into the regular rotation unprepared was a bad baseball decision. Now they can spot start, learn from some great pitchers, and develope at a more natural pace. I personally think Kennedy is crap but I still have faith in Hughes.

    - Finally, the Yankees are a model franchise based on their consistency and profitabiliy, not just based on their on the field success. Mike Illitch could just as easily build a sports network around the Wings and Tigers -- taking in that advertising revenue for himself instead of giving it to Fox Sports (much like the old PASS Network) but instead he declines to go that route. THe statement I made was based on the overall business model of the franchise. Only when the business model is sound will the team have success. Maybe if the Tigers' hadn't handed Dontrel Willis a 3 year deal before they figured out if he could even find the plate anymore, or had not wasted cash on the likes of Renteria or Jones, they would have had a little leftover money to toss their hat in the ring on some of these guys.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs