Louis Freeh Report: Penn State Top Brass Covered Up Sandusky for 14 Years

Part of: There, I Said It!

The 267-paged report from former FBI Director Louis Freeh confirmed what many who have followed the Jerry Sandusky case always suspected, that Penn State covered up the now convicted pedophile and former Penn State defensive coordinator for 14 years (1998-2011). No one told the Board of Trustees, and no one said a word to students that a possible threat to their community was on campus. Nothing. It just makes you sick to your stomach.

The scandal broke last fall amid accusations of Sandusky sexually abusing a child in 2001, and it was only speculated that top university officials knew about his monstrous behavior before then. Today's report stated that the late legendary head coach Joe Paterno, former President Graham Spanier, former Vice President Gary Schultz and former Athletic Director Tim Curley all knew of the allegations of child molestation going back to at least 1998 and "repeatedly concealed critical facts" about the case from authorities and the public at large, for fear of the "consequences of bad publicity." This finding was based on the analysis of 430 interviews and sorting through millions of emails relating to the case. And who, besides naive and biased Penn State students and alumni can question that now?

When former graduate assistant Mike McQueary told Paterno about what he witnessed between Sandusky and a preteen in a locker room shower that occurred on Febuary 9, 2001, JoePa took his time notifying his superior because he didn't want to bother anyone on a weekend. And an email showed once Curley and Paterno talked about the allegation, it was decided among the top brass that Sandusky should be treated "humanely." In other words, they willfully covered up what would have been a devastating scandal that would've meant the loss of the prestige of the football program.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for charlie-doherty

Article Author: Charlie Doherty

Copy editor/content writer for Penn Multimedia; print/web journalist/freelancer, formerly for Boston Examiner, EMSI, Demand Studios, Brookline TAB, Suite 101 and Helium.com; co-head sports editor & asst. …

Visit Charlie Doherty's author pageCharlie Doherty's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Victor Lana

    Jul 12, 2012 at 5:48 pm

    Charlie, that statue (of Paterno) has to come down and NOW. They should also shut down the entire program for one year and then do a study to see if it should ever be reinstated.

    What was done and covered up is beyond horror. Think of the many lives altered forever, and the worry was about treating Sandusky fairly?

    The whole place needs to be torn apart and rebuilt from the bottom up, this time preferably putting people in administration with a spine AND a conscience.

  • 2 - Charlie

    Jul 12, 2012 at 6:58 pm

    Vic, I'm glad you reminded me about the statue. I completely forgot about that and have since edited the article to add that to the "to do" list, if you will.

    I'd love to see the Penn State football team take a whole year off too, but I didn't think that was realistic. So I came up with the bowl eligibility idea.

    We'll see what happens in the coming weeks and months.

  • 3 - Baronius

    Jul 13, 2012 at 10:07 am

    Why shut down the program? Who does that punish? What does it prevent? I can't imagine another program is going to rethink a lax position on child molestation because Penn State got a one-year suspension. It just doesn't make sense to me. I'm no fan of college football, and I'm not saying this to defend Penn State. I think college athletics have become an industry, and it's ruined them. But for the life of me, I don't see what a suspension of the program would accomplish.

  • 4 - Dr Dreadful

    Jul 13, 2012 at 10:13 am

    Have to agree. The number one assumption of the vast majority of people or organizations who do something dishonest, illegal or unethical is that they won't get caught. Punishments are not deterrents and shouldn't be regarded as such.

  • 5 - Baronius

    Jul 13, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    I've got nothing against punishment for those who did wrong. It sounds like most of the people involved are indicted or in jail. But punishing their coworkers, students, or recruits isn't justice.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 17, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs