Holland vs. Spain: The 2010 FIFA World Cup Final - Page 3

Part of: This Is Soccer

Elia is a more natural winger than Kuyt. He plays all the way out, close to the touchline and doesn’t mind his defensive duties as much as Kuyt. This gave Holland width on the field, which stretched out Spain’s defense and made space for Robben to turn into goal, which is why Holland looked to be the biggest goal threat in the second half.

On the other side, Spain brought on Cesc Fabregas for Alonso, which allowed Xavi to drop back into his preferred space, one that allows him to see the entire field and orchestrate the attacking area. Fabregas plays a more direct attacking style than Alonso and had a one-on-one early on.

Jesus Navas came on for Pedro Rodriguez, which gave Spain speed, and similar to Holland’s Elia sub, gave Spain width it needed, allowing more space for Andres Iniesta and Xavi to work. Deep into the second overtime half, Holland’s Heitinga was tracking Iniesta when he committed the foul that led to his second yellow card and dismissal from the game.

A short time later, Navas started off a long run and as Spain moved forward, Fabregas was in an advanced position to make an assist to Iniesta who found himself free to score the winning goal.

With this victory, Spain added another clean sheet to their world record for the most consecutive knockout games without conceding a single goal, a fact that shows the power of possession as a defensive strategy as much as an offensive one.

After Spain defeated Germany in the 2008 European Championship, the Spanish people wondered if it was a fluke. They now know it was not. Spain will go down as one of the greatest international teams in history. At times, they struggled to find the best balance in their system. But they remained committed to their positive, attacking style and defensive abilities, and were rewarded with a landmark win.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for earl-g-lundquist

Article Author: Earl G. Lundquist

Soccer, Jazz, Books, and Life.

Visit Earl G. Lundquist's author pageEarl G. Lundquist's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Dr Dreadful

    Jul 18, 2010 at 12:36 pm

    Spain probably have a few more months before other teams start to figure out how to play against them, and they'll then have to adapt to a new tactical system.

    They deserved to win the World Cup because they were the best team, although I disagree with what seems to be the general consensus that they were also the most enjoyable and/or exciting team to watch. A game should be about watching two teams play entertaining football against each other, not about one team passing the ball around without showing any particular attacking ambition while the other team desperately tries to get it off them.

  • 2 - the criminal

    Jul 18, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    i think,the spain can win bacause spain have agood strategy and have a best playyer

  • 3 - Brenda

    Jul 22, 2010 at 2:47 am

    I remember the holland teams of the 1970's, where they played complete football. They were the European equivalent to the Brazilians.

    This Holland team were awful to watch, there was no real skill, and their focus was on trying to intimidate the Spanish team with rough house tactics. At least 3 dutch players should have been sent off.

    The Spanish easily deserved to win the final, as they at least tried to play entertaining soccer.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 17, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs