Final Four: Men's Basketball Soundly Defeats Parity, Too

So all that jazz about men's basketball having more upsets than their female counterparts? Feel free to redact that entire sentiment.

Your Final Four for the 2008 NCAA basketball tournament: Kansas, Memphis, North Carolina, and UCLA. All one seeds. Oddly, enough, this is the first time all No. 1s have made advanced through their respective regions. Every year, even so much as a scrawny 2nd-seeded powerhouse ekes through the bracket.

This is about as exciting as cheering for record profits from Wal-Mart, Exxon, Halliburton, and Microsoft. One would imagine at least one, perhaps two or three, of those companies would excel in the first quarter, but imagine if all four conglomerates concurrently hit the corporate jackpot. There's really no course of action except to delay one's faith in capitalism for another year.

Because it's the Final Four. We need an underdog. One doesn't exist, unless you count Memphis. And we shouldn't, because even though they're the lone representative from the mediocre Conference USA, they obliterated everyone in their path—including 2nd-seeded Texas and 5th-seeded Michigan State in their past two games—losing only at in-state rival Tennessee, who was a No. 2 seed this year.

Last year, we had a couple of No. 2s slip through to the Final Four, those teams being Georgetown and UCLA. And two years ago was the year of George Mason. A freakin' 11 seed in the Final Four. Moreover, not a single No. 1 seed was in the 2007 Final Four. Those were the days.

But we don't have anything close to a seeded underdog. Instead it's Memphis and three other oil tycoons. Kansas has been one of the favorites all year. North Carolina is the media darling's favorite, coming from the underrepresented ACC. And UCLA ... well, they're just so freakin' experienced, the seniors on the team already have experience in a championship game and two Final Fours.

Tenth-seeded Davidson had their chance to become this year's Final Four surprise, but they fell two points shy to Kansas, 59-57. The de facto Cinderella of the team, the tiny school from Charlotte, was the only team who came remotely close to winning a game in the Round of Eight. Louisville, Xavier, and Texas all went down with about as much resistance as the wind emanating from a referee's whistle when a UCLA player charges into a defender. (Which is none. Get it?)

But on the other side, most of the tournament games have been a sudden cure for insomnia, with the close ones coming in the first few rounds. Perhaps this means that four great teams, when in the same venue, will produce three equally amazing games. And if you were cheering for one of the Duke brothers to win that one-dollar bet in Trading Spaces, then this year's Final Four might be right up your alley.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for Matthew T. Sussman

Article Author: Matthew T. Sussman

Sussman is the sports editor of BC Magazine. He also writes for Deadspin and Toledo Free Press. He and Tuffy can be heard hosting the Treehouse Fort, Sundays at 12 noon ET. Plus, he Twitters. Feed the feedback back to matt.sussman@blogcritics.org.

Visit Matthew T. Sussman's author pageMatthew T. Sussman's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.

blogcritics lists for Jul 09, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for June

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs