Draft Day Shocker: The Houston Texans Sign Mario Williams And Not Reggie Bush

In the NFL Draft — any professional draft for that matter — there is no such thing as a sure thing. However, Reggie Bush is as close to a sure thing as there has ever been. By choosing defensive end Mario Williams over Bush, the Texans have made one of the classic blunders of all time; they've broken a rule on a par with "never get into a land war in Asia", and "never bet against a Sicilian with death on the line".

A slightly less known blunder — but a blunder nevertheless — is never NOT pick the best player in the draft when that player is a Heisman Trophy-winning running back. The Texans will pay for this mistake – with their fans and on the field – for years to come. From a perception standpoint this move is a loser; it is guaranteed that the Texans fans are not going to hold this move in high regard, which means that Williams is going to have an even tougher job than usual acclimating to the pros. Also, no matter how successful Williams is, his progress will forever be tied to and compared to Bush’s. With each of Bush’s amazing runs and 100-yard games, critics of the Texans will inevitably bring up what Williams has or hasn't accomplished.

This is not meant as a slight against Williams, who is one of the top three players in the draft. But the bottom line is that given the Texans' situation, the number one pick in this year’s draft should have been Reggie Bush.

This makes things much more interesting for the rest of the teams that have the top five or six picks. And it also sets things up so that another teams can make the wrong move. Who will benefit most from this blunder? Which team will make the next mistake? The Saints, the Titans, the Jets or will a middle-of-the-pack team pull off a draft day trade and shock everyone?

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for sal-marinello

Article Author: Sal Marinello


Sal Marinello is a National Strength and Conditioning Association Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and Certified Personal Trainer, a U.S.A. Weightlifting Certified Coach, a full-time, private Professional Strength and Conditioning …

Visit Sal Marinello's author pageSal Marinello's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - RedTard

    Apr 29, 2006 at 10:26 am

    It has been assumed and repeated held as gospel that Reggie Bush is the greatest thing since sliced bread. I think he can only disappoint.

    Running backs are not the foundation of an NFL team, they're the capstone. I don't think he'll garner any stats or records at New Orleans. Their line is terrible. Regardless of how good you are if there are 4 defenders boxing you in before you leave the backfield you're not going anywhere.

    Williams, on the other hand, could turn out to be a star wherever he goes. Ends don't need a team to be great. It's a 1 on 1 or 1 on 2 competition.

  • 2 - sal m

    Apr 29, 2006 at 11:25 am

    with regards to bush, that is so incorrect it boggles the mind. there have been no assumptions about bush. his reputation of greatness and the unanimous opinion that he'll be a great pro is predicated upon what he has done on the playing field at every level.

    great running backs are not like other great skill position players.

    bush should let the saints know that he has no intention of signing with them...pull and elway or eli manning.

    new orleans is a mess both as a franchise and as a city. he'll ultimately make more money going lower, especially if the jets get off of their butt and make an offer.

  • 3 - REDDOG1

    Apr 29, 2006 at 11:46 am

    HOUSTON'S reasoning for not taking Reggie Bush is the same reasoning that lead them to the great season they had last year. !!!!!!!!!!

  • 4 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Apr 29, 2006 at 2:17 pm

    Before there was an ESPN comparison of Mario Williams to Reggie White. I'm not defending the pick but that's not a bad pickup.

    The Sam Bowie comparisons can come starting next season.

  • 5 - El Bicho

    Apr 29, 2006 at 3:16 pm

    If they were going to pass on Bush, I'm surprised that Houston didn't pick Young. No slight to Carr since the team's failing aren't his fault alone, but it would have done well at the box office.

    Bush and Brees in NO will at least make the team interesting to watch this next season.

    I was surprised by Leinart's tumble to AZ. I thought reuniting with Norman Chow would be ideal, but Tenn's pass might suggest why Chow didn't return last year to what seemed like an ideal situation. Of course, great in college doesn't translate to great in pros, but how could the Jets, Buffalo and Oakland all pass on him. Pennington seems to have peaked in ability and is prone to injury, but they must have greater needs. Buffalo has more offensive than defensive needs. But Oakland? That's the oddest because, regardless of its location, Oakland is a Southern Cal team.

    Lastly, a little housekeeping:

    VIZZINI: You fell victim to one of the classic blunders. The most famous is "Never get involved in a land war in Asia." But only slightly less well known is this: "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line."

  • 6 - sal m

    Apr 29, 2006 at 4:11 pm

    muy bien, el bicho...

    in 4 years everyone will be saying, "how did all those teams pass up on leinart."

    the nfl over-analyzes everything...and it's getting annoying.

    lastly, i was paraphrasing off the top of my head, but it's good to know that there's another princess bride fan out there.

  • 7 - Pratyush

    Apr 29, 2006 at 6:17 pm

    the nfl over-analyzes everything...and it's getting annoying.

    There are so many positions. So people can talk on so many aspects. The key is to talk on what matters but people like talking even on the irrelevant.

  • 8 - sal m

    Apr 29, 2006 at 6:29 pm

    i should have made myself clearer on the over-analyzing...i was referring to how closely the teams look at the players...and how the league in general treats everything as if it's a science...i have no problem with the pundits being pundits...

  • 9 - Pratyush

    Apr 29, 2006 at 7:08 pm

    Okay right. We differ slightly on this but any way.

  • 10 - RJ Elliott

    Apr 29, 2006 at 9:53 pm

    Well, the Lions blew it AGAIN, by choosing a defensive player over Matt Leinhart, who went with the 10th overall pick...

  • 11 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Apr 29, 2006 at 10:02 pm

    Detroit needs to stop picking quarterbacks, from Andre Ware to Joey Harrington, it hasn't been pretty.

    Call me crazy, but I thought Kitna revived his career a bit in the year before Carson Palmer took control of the Bengals. I think with some good players around him he can manage an offense that can get 8 wins.

  • 12 - MCH

    Apr 29, 2006 at 10:12 pm

    Give the Lions the first 10 picks before anyone else even chooses and they still finish under .500 again....

  • 13 - RJ Elliott

    Apr 29, 2006 at 10:46 pm

    DID YOU KNOW?

    The Detroit Lions, at one time or another, have had the Heisman Trophy winners from 1988 to 1991 (Barry Sanders, Andre Ware, Ty Detmer, and Desmond Howard) on their roster. And they still sucked (except for in 1991, when Barry Sanders was in his prime, and the Lions actually won a playoff game)...

  • 14 - sal m

    Apr 29, 2006 at 11:10 pm

    i've always followed the lions since i read the book paper lion - and saw the movie - as a kid.

    matt millen or isiah thomas, which guy is the worst executive in all of pro sports?

  • 15 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Apr 29, 2006 at 11:24 pm

    From Deadspin:

    Isiah Thomas gets more attention, but Matt Millen is by far the worst general manager in sports. Both guys run horrible franchises, but Thomas took over a horrible franchise and has only had a couple of years of his futile attempt to turn it around. Millen took over a team with a winning record and is now in his sixth year of running it into the ground.
    Check. And mate.

  • 16 - patrick mekaio

    Apr 30, 2006 at 3:14 am

    why not pick from new zealand where the samoans playing rugby are bigger and faster at 320-450lbs

  • 17 - patrick

    Apr 30, 2006 at 3:23 am

    i'm on holiday here in new zealand and i watched a game of rugby, this big samoan guy weighing in at least 350lbs sprinting and jogging around the rugby field with no problems at all, something that any linemen in the NFL could not do.

  • 18 - Pratyush

    Apr 30, 2006 at 8:39 am

    Kiwis are awesome at Rugby, yes.

  • 19 - sal m

    Apr 30, 2006 at 9:18 am

    that's because nfl linemen don't have to sprint and jog...that's like saying why not draft all nba guys because they can run and jump...apples and oranges...why don't the soccer teams take them?

    if the rugby skill set crossed over to football A) the nfl scouts would be all over those guys and B) those guys would be all over the nfl because they'd make way more money.

  • 20 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Apr 30, 2006 at 1:26 pm

    That's why a lot of people think Haloti Ngata is going to be a spectacular defensive tackle for the Ravens, granted he's Tongan but it's all Polynesia to me.

  • 21 - lori

    Apr 30, 2006 at 5:36 pm

    Screw the Jets.

    How did Big Blue fare in the draft, Sal?

  • 22 - sal m

    Apr 30, 2006 at 6:22 pm

    giants made a very questionable first round pick...the de from boston college wasn't ranked better than a mid-second rounder at best, by anyone...coughlin is an ex-bc'er so perhaps that had something to do with it.

    their second round pick was a good one, as they picked moss a burner wide receiver/kick returner from miami which gives their offense another weapon.

    i still don't understand how they haven't picked an heir to tiki barber in the past two drafts, especially since d'angelo williams from memphis state was available for the giants with their orignal first round pick.

    i don't think you can judge the lower round picks until they get into camp and you see who makes the roster.

  • 23 - Luckless Pedestrian

    May 01, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    According to ESPN (Clayton, I think?), if Reggie had been more ready to make a deal, Houston would have taken him. Sounds like he played hardball and they walked away. You could infer from this that Reggie didn't really want to go to the Texans and was willing to make less in New Orleans. True? Who knows.

  • 24 - sal m

    May 01, 2006 at 6:35 pm

    these guys are so crazy...the only thing i would infer is that bush wanted more and thought that by saying "no" the texans would up their price...other than that, i'm at a loss!

  • 25 - Justin

    Dec 14, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Boy you guys sure know your football.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 09, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs