Blogcritics Has March Madness Fever, And The Only Prescription Is...

Last week 65 teams set out to win the most exciting tournament of the year, the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament. March Madness. The Big Dance.

What makes the tournament so special is that not every team favored to win makes it out alive. On the contrary, teams of yesteryear, like Coppin State and Hampton, can defeat high-profile teams in the first round, busting everyone's brackets and coughing up money in the office pool before you can say "Sweet 16."

This year, three teams are playing the role of spoiler. George Mason, Wichita State, and Bradley are all thrilled to be among the final sixteen games, but they all have their sights set on the Final Four. They've each vanquished high-profile teams, but can they go head to head with Duke or Connecticut, basketball's elite programs? Can Bradley advance past No. 1-seed Memphis? Will Georgetown sneak out of the Minneapolis region — through Florida, Villanova and Boston College? Will Dick Vitale's head explode in mid-sentence out of excitement?

It's awesome, baby. And our Blogcritics have already caught March Madness fever:

March Madness: Connecticut’s Season Was Somehow a Disappointment
The most talented UConn team ever? No question. The best? Not in the top five.
Posted to Sports by Dan McGowan on March 27, 2006 08:28 AM

March Madness: Sweet 16 Games Lost in The Shuffle
How the University of Washington got the shaft in the NCAA tourney and then were erased from our memories forever
Posted to Sports by Adam Hoff on March 27, 2006 08:25 AM

March Madness: Redick and Morrison Overcome With March Sadness
Lasting images of Duke and Gonzaga's losses could be two stars doing impressions of Evelyn Gardner in A League of Their Own.
Posted to Sports by Matthew T. Sussman on March 24, 2006 07:39 AM

March Madness: LSU Upends Duke, Tigers Fans Geaux Nuts
#4 seeded LSU knocks off #1 overall seeded Duke 72-64 in the NCAA tournament.
Posted to Sports by M.D. Sandwasher on March 24, 2006 12:59 AM

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for matthew-t-sussman

Article Author: Matthew T. Sussman

Sussman is the founder and former editor of Blogcritics Sports. Twitter: @suss2hyphens

Visit Matthew T. Sussman's author pageMatthew T. Sussman's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - RogerMDillon

    Mar 21, 2006 at 4:40 am

    Correction, and I'm not referring to your incorrect pick of No 1's losing, 65 teams did not "set out to win the most exciting tournament of the year". The 64th and 65th teams played against each other to see who would take a beating in the first round of the tournament.

    I hope they make enough money on it because the play-in game is an embarrassment.

  • 2 - sal m

    Mar 21, 2006 at 8:21 am

    everybody knows that the prescription for a fever is more cowbell....

  • 3 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Mar 21, 2006 at 10:39 am

    Correction to your correction. Only 32 teams set out to win the tournament, because no 9-16 seeds have ever won the national championship.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs