Today on Blogcritics
Home » Spider-Man 2: Life Under the Mask

Spider-Man 2: Life Under the Mask

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

While the first Spider-Man film was about Peter Parker learning what it means to be Spider-Man, the second seems to be about Spider-Man learning that he still has to be Peter Parker. That may sound a little tautological, but the differences between the hero and the ordinary man developed so well in 2002 are still the main driving force in 2004, and director Sam Rami knows how to use emotional turmoil to power a great film! The movie’s tagline ‘Sacrifices’ really does sum up the story, with both the hero, villains and love interest all having to make life-changing decisions which see friends, foes and lives left in their wake. Tobey Maguire does a decent job as our hero, and manages to spend a surprisingly large amount of time out of his Spider-Man mask (even while wearing the rest of the costume). Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane Watson and James Franco as Harry Osborn both make welcome returns and build more depth to their already well-established characters.

The most significant addition to the cast is Alfred Molina as Doctor Otto Octavius (Doc Ock); Molina is brilliant and brings human complexity to a lead villain in a way over-acting Willem Dafoe never could. Indeed, Octavius initially echoes Norman Osborne (Dafoe) as a brilliant, driven scientist whose premature testing of new technologies cause a catastrophic accident which sees the scientist changed forever. Octavius, however, is not trying to design a weapon, but rather is seeking to develop an unlimited power source for the good of all. He has to use four technological manipulator arms which are imbued with their own artificial intelligence, and interface with Octavius’ spine directly. Of course, during the accident, the manipulator arms fuse onto Octavius’ body and the artificiality drives him to become the criminal Doc Ock. Molina, however, manages to maintain the complexity of his character and always seem a likely candidate for redemption if Spider-Man can make that crucial connection.

While Alfred Gough, Miles Millar and author Michael Chabon are credited with the story, Alvin Sargent was the final screenplay writer and has done a fabulous job, mixing intelligent comedy, emotional complexity and believable action. There are also plenty of nods and in-jokes for those comic book fluent, but the movie stands just fine on its own right. It is also worth noting that just as the first film did, Spider-Man 2 manages to make New York and her citizens a key character in their own right. Not only does the cityscape feature prominently, but in a crucial scene New Yorkers reciprocate the good will that Spider-Man has shown to them. This proves very important in re-orienting a Peter Parker who almost lost his belief in heroicism. These elements also prove interesting when thinking about Spider-Man as a soldier who loses his way but finds it again through love (of both a city and a girl), not war!

Ultimately, Spider-Man 2 is every bit as good as the first instalment, building an action-packed world where emotional nuances and human complexity drive a spectacularly visual tale. Oh, and the special effects are brilliant, of course!

Powered by

About Tama

  • http://screenrant.com Vic

    Nice review, it’s much tighter than my Spiderman 2 review. I tend to ramble more and am working towards a more concise style like your own.

    Vic

  • http://mesothelioma-symptoms.to10.de/ Peter

    It is known that mesothelioma is caused by breathing asbestos fibers into the lungs. When this happens, the lungs or the abdomen may be affected by the disease. Because asbestos is so strongly linked to mesothelioma, regulations have been created to set limits on the amount of exposure to asbestos a worker can have in a workplace.