Today on Blogcritics
Home » Shadows and Fog Review

Shadows and Fog Review

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Woody Allen’s tribute to German expressionism is better than most critics would have you believe. Sure, there is very little plot to speak of; it’s more a series of vignettes and gags than a cohesive narrative. Sure, it ends rather abruptly, never solving the mystery, but none of this stopped my thorough enjoyment of this film.

As the title suggests, the entire movie is designed in shadows and fog. Shot with beautiful black and white photography, Allen and cinematographer Carlo Di Palma create the look and feel of an unnamed East European city as seen in such films as M and Nosferatu. The lighting is set up so that in nearly every shot underlying shadows engulf the scene. In the exteriors, a vicious fog rolls across the night sky, obscuring most details. Through the fog bumbles Kleinman (Allen is his typical neurotic schmuck role), trying to find his role in a vigilante mob’s plan to stop a serial killer roaming the streets. From dark night until dawn, Kleinman wanders from place to place, meeting a wide variety of curious characters (played by an even more curious group of celebrities), the most endearing of which is a desperate sword swallower (Mia Farrow) who has wandered into a brothel after fleeing her cheating boyfriend/clown (John Malkovich).

The film borrows a great deal from M. A killer roams the streets in the dark of night. Vigilante mobs run amok, causing more chaos than creating security. Even Kleinman does his best bit as a captured Peter Lorre frantically trying to explain his actions through the night. And of course the lingering shadows across haunted streets echo directly back to that film. The killer in this film resembles the vampire in Nosferatu a great deal. I am not an expert in German expressionist films, so I am sure there are more films that Allen is paying homage to, but from what I can see, he truly did them justice in that typical Allen way.

It is a little unsettling to watch Allen do his normal shtick while the characters around him are murdered, subjected to racial prejudice, beaten by the police and discuss such subjects as love, sex, and meaning. There is a subtext involving the plight of the Jews between the World Wars, foreshadowing the Nazis. Yet the gags remain as solid as any Woody Allen film. Amongst the seriousness of his subtext and the films he is paying homage to, Allen finds away to bring full bellied laughter. Though his quirky neurosis isn’t as resolutely hilarious as it is in such films as Annie Hall, it is still enough to fill the film with mirth.

The film ends rather abruptly with Kleinman having never learned his role in the plan, nor the killer having been caught. Yet as the credits role we realize the mystery was not so much the reason behind the story as method in creating it.

Powered by

About Mat Brewster

  • http://www.rodneywelch.blogspot.com/ Rodney Welch

    I liked it better when Bergman made it.

  • http://www.midnitcafe.blogspot.com Mat

    I’ve never seen a Bergman I didn’t like. Thanks for the pick, Rodney.