In the late '80s, I was photographing a lecture at Bard College by a political scientist from a prestigious, Boston university. He spoke of the coming break-up of the Soviet Union that would, if it happened, be caused by global communication systems. The fall of that wall was no more surprising than will be the fall of the Bush Wall on our Southern border. The Soviet Union was pulled like Lenin from its' pedestals by more than just the emerging PC and the phone and fax but by its' own incompetence. Higher technology communications just got the word out better.
The Guardian provides an example in the story of a 2002 promise in writing by Yahoo to the Chinese to follow "self-regulation," declaring it would not allow the Internet publishing of "pernicious information that may jeopardize state security". In 2005, Google admitted to not allowing links to banned materials by their servers in China. The writers of messages including the words "liberty," "democracy," or "human rights" receive a warning that their message contains "forbidden language," which they must delete.
In the wake of the Tianaman Square massacre in Beijing in '89, the focus word of the demonstration was "democracy". They even sculpted a make-shift Statue of Liberty (while America considers melting the real one into border walls). Many said without access to copy machines, PCs, and, especially, fax services, the democratic movement and the world's knowledge of its violent end would not have been possible. My photograph here is from a Chinese-American demonstration in a Hudson River city in memorial to the slain and imprisoned demonstrators staged during the days of, and surrounding, the episode.
A second Internet weakness is what the OpenNet Initiative published recently. They showed that the Chinese government is succeeding in censoring the Internet. They control the companies that control the routers and, with filtering systems — which they are reporting now as increasingly sophisticated in China and in Viet Nam — messages containing certain words can be blocked. "We had the dream that the Internet would free the world, that all the dictatorships would collapse," opined Julien Pain of Reporters Without Borders. "We see it was just a dream."







Article comments
1 - Bliffle
Naaah. As a user of the internet (originally called ARPA when it was just mimeographed synopses and abstracts of various grad student papers mailed among grad schools), and a technical implementor of several proprietary networks such as IBM SNA and DECnet, I'm here to tell you that circumvention of attempts to control and stifle "internet" activity are doomed.
Why? Because the underlying technology is decentralized. Anyone with primitive internet TCP/IP on their PC is capable of hooking into an underground secure network through a shift-register modulated spread spectrum broadcast system which is not only data secure but undetectable! All one needs is a simple modulator/demodulator for an RF network that could, for example, exploit the 2.4ghz cordless phone band. Childs play.
2 - Deano
Ummmm...Wow. Is dilithim involved? Anywhere?