A couple of weeks ago, I gave a talk at Professional Fundraising Magazine's Digital Communications for Charities conference, called The Social Media Conversation (slides are here). Kicked off by Roger Jones and creative director of The Good Agency, Reuben Turner, my bit was a case study of what I'm working on for Compassion in World Farming. So I quickly go over how we're optimising their use of Flickr, Wikipedia, YouTube, Twitter and Facebook, and then go over how we're monitoring it. Monitoring social media activity is what everyone seems to be talking about right now, i.e. monitoring your brand's "buzz." So the sites I talk about are Qdos, HowSociable, Twitter Grader, Google Trends, Google Insights, Omgili, Serph, and of course Google Analytics.
Qdos I have only seen used for individuals and not for brands or organisations, but I don't see why it wouldn't work for them, so I've been using it to assess changes in Compassion's online reputation over time. It's quite fun to see who you're more famous than, and it provides a nice "splodge" diagram of how active, unique and popular you are and how much impact what you say has. It doesn't work for an organisation's Facebook Pages though.
HowSociable allows you to subscribe to monthly updates and compares you against famous brands like Coca Cola who are given a rank of 1000, so your number is in comparison to that.
Twitter Grader grades you against other Twitter users so you get a score depending on how much you tweet, how many followers you have, and how many people you're following. They've also just launched Facebook Grader where you can get a score for how famous you are on Facebook. Myself, I do better on Twitter.
Others I'm using but didn't have time to talk about include Social Mention, Samepoint and Twitterholic. Twitterholic is great because you get a graph over time of how many followers you had each day, so if it suddenly drops you can go and check what you said that offended everyone. Mine dropped off quite significantly one day when I called Chris Rock a racist, but I reckon Twitter had just done a sweep of spam accounts and deleted a bunch of people.
Article comments
1 - Richard Krueger
Beth - good information! Glad you're familiar with samepoint.com. We've set up a "listening post" to track Samepoint mentions using NetVibes and Samepoint as our social data source.
2 - Social Media
Great Article and some great tools mentioned. Have a question though if you could only monitor and market in one social network, which would it be and why?
Do you feel twitter will prove more valuable to marketers / reputation managers than facebook because of the more consistent updating / content refreshing?
3 - Beth Granter
Thanks for the comments. To reply to your questions, firstly, the chosen network depends on what you're trying to market and who you're trying to talk to or listen to. So for some causes, LinkedIn would make more sense than Facebook. But most cases would find some use for Facebook I think. In terms of Twitter, I don't think it will become more valuable than Facebook because it takes more effort to maintain a quality Twitter feed than to run a Facebook Ad or moderate a Facebook Page.