The Six Dirty Words You Can't Say on My Blog

Author: bhwPublished: Jul 28, 2005 at 8:27 am 14 comments

When ideas fail, words come in very handy.

  --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

A few days ago, my husband tried three times to post a comment to my blog. Each time, his comment was rejected because it looked like spam. The poor man was completely perplexed. What had he done to appear as if he were spamming my site? He had no idea, but like the little train that could, he just kept typing away and eventually wrote a comment that was not rejected by my spam filter.

The first three times, he had apparently used a dirty word. But not any old dirty word, a BHW dirty word.

My spam filter, MT-Blacklist, works by screening comments for text strings, URLs, and regexes [fancy geek-speak, I think, for a method of matching sequences of characters or words] that are on a blacklist. I can set each blacklist entry to either block the comment or force it into a queue where I have to approve or reject it. MT-Blacklist also forces moderation for comments posted to old entries and for suspicious-looking comments, such as those containing a bunch of URLs.

Make no mistake, MT-Blacklist is a censorship tool. In addition to banning URLs, I have had to ban specific words from the comments to keep my site from being overtaken by spammers. I hate banning any words at all. But if I don't use MT-Blacklist, I might as well shut the whole site down because it would become nothing more than a huge gambling-prescription-drug-mortgage-refinancing-dick-stiffening advertisement.

Oddly and pleasantly enough, however, George Carlin's seven dirty words are still legal. So go ahead and comment to your heart's content about shit, piss, fuck, cunt, cocksucker, motherfucker, and tits. Say 'em loud and say 'em proud, motherfuckers.

But don't you dare write about casino, credit, equity, online, poker, or Texas. Those are the new dirty words, the vilest of the vile. Put just one of them in a comment on my blog, and feel the wrath of the BHW anti-spamhole rejection message, beeotch.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for bhw

Article Author: bhw

Visit bhw's author pagebhw's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Natalie Bennett

    Jul 28, 2005 at 9:15 am

    Ah-ha. I've been trying to post on a friend's blog often and getting the same problem. Now I've had these hints I'll have to try again.

    And even if it doesn't work, thanks for a most enjoyable post.

  • 2 - Dave Nalle

    Jul 28, 2005 at 9:52 am

    I find that scanning for Holdem works exactly the same as scanning for Texas, but folks from Texas can still mention their state in responses.

    Dave

  • 3 - bhw

    Jul 28, 2005 at 10:14 am

    Hmmmm... hadn't thought of that. Although Texans can just abbreviate to TX, I suppose.

  • 4 - Bennett

    Jul 28, 2005 at 11:32 am

    Thanks for this bhw. I need to set up the list on my blog. Right now it's on moderate all comments and that seems to stop 'em.

    Almost no one except spammers ever visits my blog (so it seems, I could be wrong, and that may change someday).

    You must have quite the traffic!

  • 5 - Chris Beaumont

    Jul 28, 2005 at 2:07 pm

    I don't even get spammers...... I don't get much of anyone at my site...

  • 6 - Bennett

    Jul 28, 2005 at 2:16 pm

    Yeah Chris, but in a way I cool with it. I use my blog as a repository and construction site for my BC posts.

    Not enough time to do the "daily blog" thing anyway.

  • 7 - Phillip Winn

    Jul 28, 2005 at 2:46 pm

    I'd post the blacklist for comments here, but, um, I don't want to give any ideas. Suffice to say that I have several varieties of poker games listed: holdem, hold-em, hold em, and so on.

    So far, only in URLs and Names, but I'm finding that I'm going to have to start doing more parsing of comment text soon. Clever buggers.

  • 8 - Aaman

    Jul 28, 2005 at 2:50 pm

    wouldn't the blacklist get blacklisted?

  • 9 - DrPat

    Jul 28, 2005 at 3:02 pm

    Funny, I don'get spam at all, and Blogger doesn't really have any blacklisting capabiliy. Maybe it's because their native comment handler doesn't allow href links.

    Or maybe it's just that books aren't a big draw for gamblers...

  • 10 - bhw

    Jul 28, 2005 at 3:19 pm

    Maybe it's because their native comment handler doesn't allow href links.

    That'll do it. The links are there more for Google juice than they are for readers to find and then click.

  • 11 - Phillip Winn

    Jul 28, 2005 at 6:13 pm

    The amazing this is that we wrap URLs in redirectors and nofollow tags here, so nobody gets any googlejuice from comments, and yet I guess most people don't check to even see that.

  • 12 - bhw

    Jul 28, 2005 at 7:25 pm

    I think most spammers just look for sites with lots of old posts and open comments on them. They don't do a whole lot of checking ... I can see that some spammers who have been banned on my site for a couple of months still try to post to the site. I think they use scripts to automate the process.

  • 13 - El Bicho

    Jul 28, 2005 at 7:37 pm

    Ahhh, that would explain my difficulties in posting my DVD review for Scorsese's "Casino" in your comment section. Maybe I should call it "Goodfellas 2: The Wrath of Nicky".

  • 14 - Donnie Marler

    Sep 29, 2006 at 2:54 pm

    "Say 'em loud and say 'em proud, motherfuckers."

    My monitor thanks you for the coffee bath. Very entertaining, thank you.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.