The Little Spaceship That Could Is Lost

The Mars Global Surveyor is in trouble. The little spaceship was launched to Mars on 7 November 1996. On its 10th birthday its guardians - NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory of Cal Tech - had a busy and frustrating time.

The Surveyor is the oldest of 5 spacecraft sent to Mars. Originally NASA had planned for it to orbit our little red neighbor for two years. NASA has continued to extend those deadlines. In October of this year it again gave the robot spaceship another extension.

The Mars Global Surveyor has stuck around beaming its information back to Earth, "Hello, Houston," longer than any other human artifact sent to Mars. Therefore, we are not surprised that it sent back "more information about Mars than all earlier missions combined." The persevering little ship has been around long enough to see two more orbiters arrive — Mars Odyssey and Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

The Jet Propulsion Lab tells me that
Mars Global Surveyor has found many young gullies apparently cut by flowing water, discovered water-related mineral deposits that became a destination for NASA's Opportunity rover, mapped the planet topographically and examined many potential landing sites on Mars.

On 2 November, Surveyor began a normal maneuver to move its solar panels. One of its motors suffered some error and systems ended up putting it in "safe" mode — "... a pre-programmed state of restricted activity in which it awaits instructions from Earth." Only one weak signal has been heard from it since.

Friday, 17 November, NASA was reported by Yahoo News to have enlisted the aid of one of those two, new orbiters, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, the most powerful probe ever sent to mars, in the effort to save Surveyor. Reconnaissance has scanned the area where Surveyor may be in an effort to locate it. Since it seems to be waiting to receive a signal telling it to point one of its redundant transmitters toward Earth, finding it could help get it a clear signal. It will be next week before the scans can be read to see if Surveyor has been found.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for howard-dratch

Article Author: Howard Dratch

Howard writes on science, books, movies and news for Blogcritics and on his own blogs from the border of North and Central America.

Visit Howard Dratch's author pageHoward Dratch's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - RJ Elliott

    Nov 19, 2006 at 8:00 pm

    The antenna system's other use is to transmit data to Earth. It does that at 8.4 ghz on the X-band â€" that's 84000 on the FM dial. It sends its signal at 25 watts. By the time it gets to this planet the signal has so little juice that, JPL explains, "it would take 30 million years to store enough charge to run a wrist watch for one second."

    I encourage people to try to wrap their minds around this fact.

    I tried. I can't.

    A wrist watch can run for years on an inexpensive battery little larger than a BB.

    There are almost 32 million seconds in a year.

    32,000,000 (seconds) times, say, three (years) is almost 100 million.

    So, the energy from this signal is one-one hundred millionth of the energy stored in a tiny little watch battery. And that's if you collected the energy from this signal for 30,000,000 years!

    And yet we have sensors here on Earth, millions of miles away, sensitive enough to pick up this signal...incredible!

    The next time one of my luddite friends talks about the "uselessness" of NASA and the space program, maybe I should forward this article to them...not that they would be able to truly comprehend it any better than I...

  • 2 - Rick

    Nov 19, 2006 at 10:53 pm

    Great article, but Pasadena, not Houston, is "mission control" for unmanned interplanetary flights.

  • 3 - Donnie Marler

    Nov 21, 2006 at 11:11 am

    Highly enjoyable article, Howard. Well done.

  • 4 - duane

    Nov 21, 2006 at 12:14 pm

    Nice writeup, Howard. Keep up the good work on sci/tech stuff.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 28, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs