The Healthy Skeptic: Oprah Winfrey Has Gained Her Weight Back - A Cautionary Tale Of Celebrity Dieters And Their Diets - Page 2

Part of: The Healthy Skeptic

But if Bob Greene’s program doesn’t work for Oprah – which it clearly doesn’t and hasn’t – then how can it work for you or I? How can Oprah push this guy and how can this guy go on her show selling his wares when Oprah has gained 60 pounds in a year?

Greene bases his program on the idea that emotional eating is the root of all nutritional evil, and has clients sign a “Contract With Myself” that is classic waste of time. If you read any of his books — I have so you don’t have to — you would have wasted your time and effort completing writing assignments that were somehow supposed to help you lose weight. Maybe Oprah got writers' cramp.

And Oprah doesn’t have only one nutritional guru; she also has Jorge Cruise, another guy who owes his fame and fortune to being in the Winfrey stable of “experts.” Cruise’s horrible “8-Minutes in the Morning” workout program and an affiliation with Winfrey got his career started. But boy did he parlay that affiliation into something big, he parlayed it up the ying-yang, baby. Now he advertises that he’s America’s leading weight loss expert, claims to have “coached” 3 million people via his web site, is AOL’s in-house weight loss coach and alleges that he reaches 51 million readers throughout the country via his syndicated columns.

With all of Cruise’s knowledge and clout, forget about Oprah’s weight troubles, how is it that we have an obesity epidemic in this country? With Cruise’s latest bit of gimmickry, “The 3-Hour Diet,” how is it that millions of us little people can benefit from this stuff, but billionaire Oprah is missing out? By the way, Cruise claims that by eating the appropriate meal every three hours he guarantees that a person will start losing belly fat immediately, and will lose 2 pounds per week. And of course there are products and meals to purchase along the way.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for sal-marinello

Article Author: Sal Marinello


Sal Marinello is a National Strength and Conditioning Association Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist and Certified Personal Trainer, a U.S.A. Weightlifting Certified Coach, a full-time, private Professional Strength and Conditioning …

Visit Sal Marinello's author pageSal Marinello's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Lisa McKay

    Apr 18, 2006 at 9:17 am

    Great article, Sal. So let me ask you a question -- is there anything that works better than the 'eat less, move more' program? I've always assumed that if you expend more calories than you take in over time, you'll lose weight, and that should work regardless of what type of calories you consume. The one thing that's pretty obvious is that if there was one plan that really, truly worked, there'd only be one plan.

  • 2 - JELIEL³

    Apr 18, 2006 at 10:38 am

    Hey Sal, nice to see we have a fitness guru. Can you point me to a graphical training guide online or deadtree for those training with free weights only? I use a barbell and 2 dumbbells (with many disks). It's all got and have space for. TIA for any help you can provide me/us

  • 3 - sal m

    Apr 18, 2006 at 10:40 am

    "eat less and move more" about sums it up...the problem is that in the rush to make money too many people have needlessly confused the issue of nutrition. oprah's gurus are as guilty of this as anyone.

    i always have said that if someone is drowning, you grab them by the neck and yank them out of the water. you don't ask them why they can't swim or why they are in the water.

    these diet gurus have come up with all of these theories and plans that have nothing to do with getting to the heart of the issue, which is "eat less and move more."

    there's very little money to be made by telling people to "eat less and move more," but as we all now know there's a ton of money to be made by demonizing certain types of calories and by coming up with all kinds of crazy nutritional schemes.

    a big part of the problem is a lack of personal responsibility. too many people have gotten too lazy and they are unwilling to make the necessary - and not too difficult - changes in their lives.

  • 4 - Lem

    Apr 18, 2006 at 10:48 am

    Truth to power, the empress bore no clothe.

  • 5 - sal m

    Apr 18, 2006 at 10:54 am

    i don't know of any online training guides off hand, but check out the link to pavel tsatsouline's very good book "power to the people." once you get past the hardcore pretense you'll find a effective and efficient way to train. pavel is also a proponent of russian kettlebell training, which i highly recommend as well.

  • 6 - JELIEL³

    Apr 18, 2006 at 1:21 pm

    i always have said that if someone is drowning, you grab them by the neck and yank them out of the water. you don't ask them why they can't swim or why they are in the water.

    The Buddha teaches this very same lesson but with a man struck with an arrow. Just pull the arow.

    I looked at the book at Amazon, pretty nifty.

  • 7 - sal m

    Apr 18, 2006 at 1:38 pm

    i never knew that about buddha...that's pretty cool...

    all of these diet gurus are guilty of ignoring my words AND the words of the great buddha!

  • 8 - Nancy

    Apr 18, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    All diets are gimmicks, that's a given. Especially if they've got someone's name on them. Then you can be sure the only person benefitting from that diet is the 'designer', be it the late Dr. Atkins, Oprah, or whomever.

    Unfortunately, even 'eat less move more' doesn't work, after a point. Something goes wrong with the ol' mechanism, & you end up gaining weight breathing air. I've seen it. This is why so many people lose weight, only to gain it back and then some, every single time. And there's always the 'and then some', which is the real killer. Something about dropping weight prompts the body to adjust so that future weight gain is harder to lose, and is magnified to add at least +/- 5%. It's obviously a pleistocene survival tactic, but unfortunately it's still with us.

  • 9 - sal m

    Apr 18, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    nancy wrote:
    "Unfortunately, even 'eat less move more' doesn't work, after a point. Something goes wrong with the ol' mechanism, & you end up gaining weight breathing air. I've seen it. This is why so many people lose weight, only to gain it back and then some, every single time."

    this is known as the yo-yo dieters syndrome...on which i'll write more about in the near future.

    however, people who eat too little and lose too much weight too quickly lose a lot of muscle along with some fat. muscle is the mechanism through which the body burns calories and by losing muscle, people minimize their ability to burn calories.

    what happens when a person crashes and puts back on the weight that they have lost - quickly - they put on more fat and not muscle. repeated bouts of this situation mess up a person's metabolism and results in nancy's above scenario. less survival tactic and more "user error."

    people who eat less to lose weight, way too frequently eat a lot less than they should. in the short term deprivation is hard enough, and in the long term is impossible. but these short term errors build up over time and result in long term consequences.

  • 10 - Nancy

    Apr 18, 2006 at 2:33 pm

    Sal, then how does this latest thing with keeping rats on literal starvation-calorie diets work? Are they just measuring how long they live, kept on starvation levels, or do they ever let them eat "normally" & see how fast they gain/regain the weight? I'll bet they'd all blow up like balloons!

  • 11 - sal m

    Apr 18, 2006 at 2:48 pm

    i'm not familiar with this...but what i will say is that when it comes to these kinds of studies, i don't feel that they are applicable to the human condition. this extreme situation doesn't have much bearing on how people live everyday. especially since rats don't have free will...

    there may be some survival mechanism that kicks in at extreme levels of depravation/starvation, but this doesn't have anything to do with people who are trying to lose weight.

    i agree with a researcher, who in response to these rat/nutrition studies, basically said these studies are like trying to understand suicide by giving a guinea pig a gun.

  • 12 - Purple Tigress

    Apr 18, 2006 at 3:38 pm

    Maybe the weight yo-yo is why people like Oprah. Particularly if most people are overweight.

  • 13 - Elvira Black

    Apr 19, 2006 at 10:06 am

    Great piece, Sal. Embarassing enough when a regular person gains a lot of weight. How much more humiliating to do so in front of the whole darn country.

  • 14 - sal m

    Apr 19, 2006 at 10:08 am

    thanks...

    the lesson for "us" is that you need to be very careful to whom you listen.

    the lesson for oprah should be that she needs to get some real help, and stop being so concerned with her weight and start being concerned with being healthy.

  • 15 - BAP

    Apr 19, 2006 at 11:55 am

    Sal, did you note the directive on your site "personal attacks not allowed"?
    Typical Harvard attitude to discredit the person..'Oprah's a good example' ..'vulnerable'.."Oprah lacks discipline" Yes, you did belittle Oprah, critical of her shared attempts to deal with this weight problem. And there you are trying to sell your book... Title sounds like the most telling con job. I didn't need this article to review all the pitfalls and failures. You just convinced me again it is a hopeless battle.

  • 16 - sal m

    Apr 19, 2006 at 12:08 pm

    BAPS:
    Perhaps you need to re-read the item. I criticize oprah for pushing her team on the rest of america when they can't even help her, with all of her resources. i criticize her team for selling gimmick laden nonsense to a public who will follow oprah without hesitation.

    there is a difference between a criticism and a personal attack. unfortunately, too many people do not understand this distinction.

    and from where did you ever get the idea that I'm trying to sell my book?? that's the funniest thing that i've ever read in a post. i don't have a book.

  • 17 - susan

    Apr 20, 2006 at 2:05 pm

    You wrote that "Oprah obviously doesn't have any discipline when it comes to her nutritional and exercise habits."

    I'd say it's obvious she has a LOT of discipline, but as you point out, she probably also has an eating disorder. I don't know her, but as someone who has the same yo-yo history, I can tell you that discipline has nothing to do with it. As Bob Greene (apparently) believe, it IS emotional in nature. A person with a compulsive eating disorder or binge eating disorder can be "disciplined" for weeks or months, but if she (or he) hasn't dealt with the reasons she eats when she isn't hungry, the weight will always come back. It is only when you face what's really "eating you" that you will lose weight and be able to keep it off.

  • 18 - sal m

    Apr 20, 2006 at 3:39 pm

    susan:
    i don't think repeated bouts of weight loss and weight gain are indications of discipline.

    if emotional eating is a compulsion, a guy like bob greene is not capable of handling this problem. the problem is with trainers who try to treat a client like oprah as if they were the typical person who needs/wants help with losing 10 or 15 pounds. these kinds of trainers don't know the limits of their capabilities. people with eating disorders need to go to medical professionals and/or mental health professionals and not personal trainers with half-baked pop psych theories.

  • 19 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    Apr 21, 2006 at 2:04 am

    Sal,

    Great article. Many years ago, a doctor put my sister on a diet by which she was to lose no more than one or two pounds a month - and gradually shrink her stomach - thus shrinking her appetite. She never gained the weight back.

    It taught me one basic lesson. If you don't shrink your appetite, no matter how many kilos you drop, you'll always have a weight problem.

  • 20 - Beth

    Apr 21, 2006 at 1:03 pm

    I don't think Oprah got down to 135 in her latest go-round...that sound like her weight right after her Optifast experience. I think she did get down to 150 or 160-ish.

    Also, I think Oprah hasn't set her self up as an "expert" on weight loss. She's set her self up as someone who has had lifelong struggles with weight. Sometime she prevails, and sometimes she doesn't. And she would be the *first* to tell you she has an eating disorder.

    Frankly, what I think the Oprah tale suggests is that *everyone* is missing the actual point. If Oprah, with her millions and her access to weight and fitness gurus, is still struggling, then maybe it's more than a question of "the right plan" or of eating less and moving more.

  • 21 - Purple Tigress

    Apr 21, 2006 at 1:36 pm

    My co-worker is on the low carb plan. I love it when she blames a little piece of bread her weight problems after eating a very large cinnamon stick or better yet, two helpings of ice cream (because it's free) or the three slices of bacon every morning.


    I know it's wrong, but I can't help but laugh (and continue to eat bread).

  • 22 - sal m

    Apr 21, 2006 at 1:52 pm

    PT:
    i think that's a great approach...i have people who express wonderment that i can actually eat a piece of cake or a cookie and not immediately gain weight from it...and i don't jump on a piece of exercise equipment to "burn off" whatever "bad" food that i ate...and i laugh...

  • 23 - TY

    Apr 25, 2006 at 7:43 pm

    I think its horrible that she is being judged for her weight gain that her "eating guru's are not doing there job"....its not there fault, its Oprah's. Maybe she's depressed or something like that. Shame on you for thinking people can't go through things in their life.

  • 24 - parrish

    Apr 27, 2006 at 6:58 am

    It's about addiction. You can "plan" and muster all of the discipline and experts and diets and exercise plans and gastric bypass surgeries that money can buy, but you have to deal with the addiction. You can pull the arrow out, but unless you find out why someone is shooting at you, (or what causes you to keep stepping into the line of fire?) you'll just keep pulling out arrows.

    A 12-step program has been the only thing that has helped me.

    I'm kind of expecting to see Oprah go the gastric bypass route, although I hope that she doesn't.

    Anyone notice that Carney Wilson put a lot of her weight back on? Yes, she had a baby, but she has not dealt with her addiction, either.

  • 25 - sal m

    Apr 27, 2006 at 7:53 am

    i agree that oprah and many others suffer from an addiction problem. how it gets to that point i will leave to the psychologists and the rest.

    however, this problem is compounded when the person and those around him/her don't recognize this problem for what it is. and then this is made even worse by the "personal trainer" or other kind of guru who is over their head and doesn't realize it.

    too many people in the fitness profession overstep their bounds when it comes to handling their clients.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs