SciTech Watch: In Theory

Part of: SciTech Watch

In all the debate surrounding various moral, scientific, and political issues, one of the most abused words is theory.

It’s not uncommon to hear a particular position disparaged as just a theory. If we view the word in light of its position in the scientific method, then a good deal of the hyperbole surrounding it is dispelled.

The scientific method is the process that scientists use to take observations and formulate an hypothesis. The hypothesis must be a statement that makes testable predictions. The success or failure of the testing of those predictions provides information that can be used to correct the hypothesis. Here’s a graphic that shows how the process works:


Flow Chart for the Scientific Method

Notice that a theory is not the initial creation of the scientific method. It is the result of an iterative process of observation, hypothesis, prediction, and testing. This is a feedback loop that results in the hypothesis being changed until it produces predictions that are subsequently tested and prove to be true.

Part of the power of the scientific method lies in the fact that one person does not have to perform all four parts of the hypothesis loop. The fact that other scientists can perform the tests on the predictions of a hypothesis means that any prejudice a single scientist has would be eliminated when predictions are tested by others in the scientific community. A hypothesis becomes a theory only when the predictions made by the hypothesis are tested and found to be correct.

Once a hypothesis becomes accepted as a theory, it is still subject to new observations, predictions and tests. If a new prediction made by the theory fails testing, then the theory is said to be falsified by the new testing results. The theory reverts to its status as a hypothesis until it can be revised and tested and is once again proven to make accurate predictions.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for john-vaccaro

Article Author: John Vaccaro

John Vaccaro is a senior technologist with a wide spectrum of experience in science and information technology. He has worked in the marketing automation, speciality polymers, healthcare and financial services areas and has extensive experience with …

Visit John Vaccaro's author pageJohn Vaccaro's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Duane

    Feb 18, 2006 at 4:31 pm

    Very instructive piece, Johniac. I hope all the creationsists read it. As a followup, maybe you could expound upon the definition of "fact" in the scientific context. I often see people make statements such as "Evolution is not a fact," or "Evolution is a fact," which just makes me cringe.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 20, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs