Publish or Perish: MIT Prank Paper Shows All You Need is Dense Jargon - Comments Page 2

Article comments

Subscribe to comment RSS

• 26 - Uriel

  Apr 23, 2005 at 1:48 am

  I've responded to the very un-excellent blog post at Ernie's 3D Pancakes:
  
  http://3dpancakes.typepad.com/ernie/2005/04/sci_followup.html
  
  

• 27 - Uriel

  Apr 23, 2005 at 11:34 am

  I might add that the whole prank seems marginally less clever than the "hoax" pulled by the finger-in-the-chili woman at Wendy's (see Finger in Chili Is Called Hoax; Las Vegas Woman Is Charged).
  
  Alan Sokal's famous hoax made fools of self-important bullshit artists who vetted his deliberate nonsense. This prank's achievement appears to have been merely to abuse a system based more or less on trust. That seems kinda juvenile.
  

• 28 - DrPat

  Apr 23, 2005 at 12:27 pm

  So, Uriel, you're okay with WMSCI's hosting a publication conference designed to allow any bullpuckey to be published, provided it "appears" scientific?
  
  This is the same kind of deal as a diploma mill. Is the doctorate one buys from them any different than the bibliography entry one buys from WMSCI? At least with a diploma mill, you know the sheepskin you bought is worth less than the paper it's printed on.
  
  Here's a wooden nickel, friend. See what it buys you.

• 29 - JR

  May 09, 2005 at 12:32 pm

  I don't know if this has been mentioned yet, but here's a PDF of another paper submitted to WMSCI. Not as clever, but...

• 30 - brunilda

  Jan 09, 2006 at 12:56 am

  Must say I got to this a little late but I would like to know why the original posting mentioned Buenos Aires, Argentina, seeming to imply a place where bogus papers would be accepted? Or was there a real conference there?