Product Review: Sennheiser’s IE 7 and Klipsch’s X10i in–ear phones

Part of: Holidays 2010

History Lesson
Since 1979, we’ve had a problem. Back then, Sony debuted a bulky but wonderful new widget called the Walkman. Folks everywhere slowly latched onto the product, which cut the cord between them and their “stereos.” Nowadays, most of us own an iSomethings — In my case, it’s three iPods of various vintages.

The Walkman not only made our audio portable but it introduced an ever larger population of consumers to the beauty, or bane, of daily headphone use. The walkcreature phenom also created the ear bud, a hideous invention that should be banned from any discussion of high fidelity music.

Until fairly recently, headphones were generally either cheap and small, such as those nasty ear buds I mentioned, or big and often a bit costly if you wanted high fidelity. In the 1980s, prior research in hearing aids and on–stage monitoring for musicians led to the development of the first high fidelity, in–ear monitors. Over time, improvements have been made and the technology has become widespread to the point where now, most quality headphone manufactures offer one or more in–ear varieties, which I’ll call earphones. Unlike headphones, which sit on or around your outer ears, supra–aural or circumaural respectively, earphones are intra–aural since they sit right in your ear canal. This has several advantages and a few disadvantages.

Why Stick It?
What I think is the most compelling advantage of a properly fitted earphone is the ability to significantly reduce the sound of the world around you, without big, cushy pads or high clamping pressure to seal out noise. For commuters who travel on public transportation or road warriors who often are in the air, this is a beautiful thing. Whereas “noise cancelling” headphones have active electronics that attempt to reduce the perception of ambient noise, always with limited success as it’s an imperfect solution, earphones physically block outside sound from reaching your ear drums in the first place. Because of that, you can listen at significantly reduced playback volumes, which means less long–term hearing loss.

Their small size and light weight relative to most headphones also contribute to their comfort. In addition, intra–aural phones are very hat-friendly, easily residing under a tuque, ear muffs, deerstalker or helmet, something that can’t be said for headphones. Finally, with proper fitting, earphones can also yield serious bass. That beefy low end response is something usually found lacking with ear buds and many open-air headphones. Unlike speakers, which launch their energy into your whole body, ’phones won’t provide any perceivable bass below about 40 Hz so, don’t expect the pant-flapping and gut-churning low end you’d get from a properly set up subwoofer.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5Page 6

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for oliver-masciarotte

Article Author: Oliver Masciarotte

A graduate of the Lowell Institute of MIT, OA Masciarotte
has spent over 3 decades immersed in the tech space.
Author of over 100 articles, OMas’ new book,
To Serve & Groove, covers “computer audio,” from the basics to the deep …

Visit Oliver Masciarotte's author pageOliver Masciarotte's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 19, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs