Mozilla 1.6

The latest version of Mozilla, the open-source browser, has been released. Version 1.6 is just a minor upgrade, and people who already use it should pick it up for the bug fixes. If you are still using Microsoft Internet Explorer, it's time you gave Mozilla some serious thought. Here's why.

Security: It only seems like a new security problem with IE is announced weekly. The one this week, already covered by Blogcritic Ken Edwards and InfoWorld, shows how someone could link together a couple of previously-known unpatched flaws of IE. The results could be devastating. The author of the InfoWorld article, Kieren McCarthy, makes the assumption that because these exploits have been known so long, and have gone unfixed by Microsoft, that MS can't figure out how to fix them. I'll then pile my own assumption on top of this one — The reason they can't be fixed is because IE is so deeply embedded into Windows, you can't fix them without re-writing Windows. (Note that this is just a guess on my part.) Not nearly as many security problems have been found in Mozilla, which is the open-source version of Netscape.

Privacy: in previous computer tips, I've already pointed out that Mozilla can crush pop up ads, without the need of third-party add-ins, and it also has a workable anti-spam feature.

Standards: Mozilla also more closely matches the standards of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) than IE. That's because it's not written in a way to make you more dependent on an operating system. There are some places, such as in the Movable Type authoring system, where you may lose some features, but those places are rare.

Mozilla is just a free download away at http://www.mozilla.org/products/mozilla1.x/. There are versions for Windows Win 95 and higher, Mac OS X 10.1.x or later, and Linux (Linux kernel 2.2.14 or later.) The hardware requirements are not very high at all. It co-exists on the same computer with IE, so you can try it without having to uninstall IE.

There will be continuing coverage of bugs and fixes in IE, Mozilla, and other software in the BugBlog.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for bruce-kratofil

Article Author: Bruce Kratofil

Bruce Kratofil blogs on bugs and other things that can go wrong with your computer at The BugBlog, and writes about computers and economics at BJK Research

Visit Bruce Kratofil's author pageBruce Kratofil's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Mark Saleski

    Jan 30, 2004 at 12:23 pm

    i've been using mozilla 1.4 for quite a while now.

    the only problems i've encountered are poorly written webpages that don't seem recognize that i've actually got a flash plugin.

    ...and once you start using features like tabbed browsing, it's tough to go back.

  • 2 - Tom

    Jan 30, 2004 at 1:10 pm

    Mozilla is great. The only problem IS that some pages written for MSIE don't load right.

    It's true once you experience the tabbed browsing, popup filters, and all the other goodies, you'll won't go back.

    Unless you have a Mac, and use Safari.

  • 3 - Mark Saleski

    Jan 30, 2004 at 1:30 pm

    is there any documentation available for the bayesian filtering of just mail?

    it seems to work pretty well for me but there are some things i wonder about.

  • 4 - Bruce Kratofil

    Jan 30, 2004 at 1:49 pm

    Mark --

    Since the code is open source, anybody can look at the code and see how it works -- anybody, that is, who knows programming. For us mere mortals, I don't know.

    The documentation for Mozilla starts here
    http://www.mozilla.org/support/

    but I haven't yet followed those links to see how extensive the information is.

    In my experience, there is probably less than a 1 in 500 chance of real mail getting shunted to my junk mail folder. However, for about every ten junk mails that gets labelled correctly as junk, there is still one or two that gets through to my regular in-box.

  • 5 - Mark Saleski

    Jan 30, 2004 at 1:55 pm

    well, i've got the expertise...but not the time (or the sourcecode at the moment).

    oh...and i'm a mere mortal too.

  • 6 - Bruce Kratofil

    Jan 30, 2004 at 2:17 pm

    Actually, it may be best not to have the details of the filtering easy to get to -- because then the spammers will have some help in devising ways of getting around them.

    Of course, they can still do it from the source code, but as you say, it takes more time and more skills

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 13, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs