Wouldn't the answer to this be to remove the tags at point of purchase just like they do with shoplifting sensors now? Why is it all or nothing?
- The use of radio tags on consumer products should be put on hold, say a number of consumer, privacy and civil liberties groups.
The campaigners said the tags could be used to undermine privacy.
They have called for a debate on the implications of the technology.
"We are not saying that this technology should not hit the mainstream, but we need to consider privacy issues," said Ian Brown, director of a UK think tank that backed the call.
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags are tiny transponders that send out radio signals. Each chip is unique, so any one item, can be tracked individually.
Some experts predict the technology will become commonplace over the next decade or so, as more and more companies use it to keep tabs on their products.
Stolen goods can be tracked, stock can be monitored quickly and a sensor could be placed on shelves which would then register when goods are moved.
But civil liberties groups are concerned that much of the talk about the technology has focused on the benefits to business, rather than the implications for consumers.
"When you look at these tags, you see an interesting technology that has the potential to save money for companies," said Mr Brown, Director of the Foundation for Information Policy Research think tank.
"But not enough energy has gone into looking at the privacy problems of having tags that can be read at a distance of 10 metres for the lifetime of the product," he told BBC News Online.
....Signatories to the petition include the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Privacy Information Centre, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Privacy International.
So far RFID trials have met resistance and suspicion. In the US, retail giant Wal-Mart has abandoned plans to put tags on razor blades because of consumer protests.
And a tagging system at Prada in New York has ruffled the feathers of its shoppers, who did not want the size of the clothes they were trying on being beamed into the air. [BBC]
The inventory and shoplifting savings could be large, and if passed on to the consumer I'm all for it. Buit I don't want to be tracked for the rest of my life or the life of the product either. Isn't removing it at sale the answer?
Article comments
1 - Jim Carruthers
The main problem is the implementation of RFID tags is they can't be easily removed, they are embedded in the product. Since they are passive (they are powered by radio waves) the cheapest way to use them is incorporate them into products at manufacture.
It's like those tiny transponders the aliens put up your nose, but without the ride in the UFO.
2 - Eric Olsen
I would think they could come up with a device to disable it, then, at point of purchase - blast it with gamma rays or someting
3 - Jim Carruthers
would think they could come up with a device to disable it, then, at point of purchase - blast it with gamma rays or someting
So the tag is in your Keith Richards Underoos. Where do you want those gamma rays directed, given the flop The Hulk was at the box office?