"Just one view, of course, but I'm surprised how much the last one resonated around the net"

My friend Stephen, the musician (among many other skills and attributes including a PhD) touring Kuwait, Syria, and Lebanon, was astonished to find how far and quickly his letter to America had permeated the Internet. After appearing here on Blogcritics.org last week, it was disseminated far and wide (especially by Glenn Reynolds and James Taranto, but please also see the pings at the bottom of the post), striking a viral chord. Whether your view is right, left, top or bottom, it seems clear to many that the media emphasizes negative news over positive, sensational "events" over prosaic process, noisy dischord over quiet accord.

Stephen writes again today:

    Thanks, Eric :-) I have a slightly better connection now. I'm up to 9600 baud...and sharing the modem between three machines.

    I'm amazed to see that my writing about Iraq/Syria/Kuwait has turned up all over the net since I left. It's amazing how a point of view that presents an alternative to the mainstream can get such coverage. In fact, my Dad wrote me from Vancouver saying he had woken up to find my views on Iraq presented in one of his daily e-mails from a news agency, about two days after I wrote it-- it was news to him, too. Gives me faith in the internet...

    The piece of the story that I did not mention, and that (I hope) is not too OT, is how the mainstream Arab media have also gotten the story wrong. Again, there are plenty of Iraqis who will tell you about their utter disgust with Al-Jazeera and Manar-- yet we are constantly told by our own CNN, NYT, etc., that somehow these agencies are the voice of the people, the "Arab Street."

    The point is, all this talk about the "Arab Street" (how do I get there again? Turn left at "Africa Street"?) is a useless generalization, reinforced by a bunch of journalists sitting around the Al-Rashid and Palestine Hotel bars, while they wait for their drivers to pick them up in air-conditioned SUVs for a day trip out to Fallujah or Ramadi. Is there a "White Street," an "Asian Street"? It's a ludicrous and vaguely racist concept to begin with.

    I have spoken to loads of Iraqis, Syrians, Kuwaitis etc. and what I have seen is the definitive breakdown of "Arab Unity" as a generation of academics (the ones who taught me at least) knew it. As I mentioned in the last e-mail, the graffiti on the walls of Baghdad University is not "US Go Home"-- it's actually...."Palestinians Go Home. The Free Ride Is Over"!!! There is a sea change going on, right now, and CNN will be the last place to learn about it.

    Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and former publisher of Blogcritics.org, and former publisher of Technorati.com, which both rule. He is now editor, co-founder, and CEO of The Morton Report.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Brian Flemming

    Sep 23, 2003 at 1:54 pm

    From CalPundit (emphasis mine):

    Virginia Postrel says she doesn't know what the real situation in Iraq is, and Glenn Reynolds responds with this:

    And neither do I, of course. But what has been obvious from here is that the bad news has been consistently overplayed and the good news consistently underplayed....


    Really? From where I sit, Glenn opines rather endlessly about the situation in Iraq. You don't have to look far, either: just read the sentence right after "And neither do I."

    The proximate cause of all this is a USA Today story about media coverage of Iraq, which actually says nothing about slanted coverage at all. What it says is that some reporters think things are better than reported while others think things are actually worse. And presumably everyone agrees with Time magazine's Brian Bennett that this really has nothing to do with bias: dramatic events are what the media reports everywhere, not just in Iraq. Their behavior in Baghdad is no different from their behavior in Los Angeles.

    In any case, there's no way of knowing whether news from Iraq is slanted unless you yourself happen to know how things are going. And considering the fact that our soldiers continue to get killed, buildings and pipelines are being bombed, the president wants 87 billion additional dollars, and reserve tours have been extended â€" well, how good can things be? We wouldn't be extending our troops' stay in Iraq and begging other countries for help if things were going better than planned, would we?

    To update Samuel Johnson, media bias is the last refuge of a scoundrel. When the news is bad and you can't actually marshal any particular facts to prove otherwise â€" aside from a few cherry picked positive reports and the descriptions of some casual visitors â€" just yell "media bias" and pretend that "bad news has been consistently overplayed" even if most of the evidence belies that.

    I have no doubt that there's good news in Iraq â€" Saddam is gone, infrastructure is being slowly rebuilt, daily life may possibly be returning to something close to normal â€" but it's pretty obvious that there's plenty of bad news too. That doesn't mean we have to give up, but the war party, which was so enthusiastic about this adventure beforehand, ought to be willing to face up to it. So quit shooting the messengers, guys, it's unbecoming.

  • 2 - Robert Moates

    Sep 23, 2003 at 2:36 pm

    "In any case, there's no way of knowing whether news from Iraq is slanted unless you yourself happen to know how things are going."

    At that point you should have stopped. But no, you had to go on, call people scoundrels and opine that things must be very bad because we hear very bad things. You say, "the media behavior in Baghdad is no different than their behavior in Los Angeles" perhaps that is the problem. Baghdad is different than LA. A shooting in Baghdad is not the same as a shooting in LA. Or are we suggesting that the police pull out of LA? (Sorry that was uncalled for)

    Fact is that if things are going well in 85% of Iraq then we would expect that a relative number of stories would reflect the same. What that number is I don't know. But it should not be inversely proportional. If it is, something else is going on.

  • 3 - Brian Flemming

    Sep 23, 2003 at 3:05 pm

    Interesting conversation at pbs.org between a person who has visited Iraq and a person who hasn't.

  • 4 - Eric Olsen

    Sep 23, 2003 at 3:11 pm

    A) I'm not sure why I should care what kevin Drum said about this unless he himself chose to visit.

    B) it all comes down to emphasis, which I mentioned in the story intro, and to emphasize the bad news disproportionately to the good news (or even the just "not bad" news) distorts the picture. I also said it isn't even a question of left vs right, or pro- vs anti-war, it's a question of giving an honest feel of the atmosphere on the ground.

    That's what I have been trying to do with these reports from the scene.

  • 5 - Joe

    Sep 23, 2003 at 3:33 pm

    Brian, am I to infer that you feel that either proximity (has or hasn't been to Iraq) or military experience (chickenhawk!) are qualifiers to having a valid opinion on the subject of Iraq? If so, would you care to share your credentials with the group.

  • 6 - Joel Andrews

    Sep 23, 2003 at 8:43 pm

    Medea basically learned this in Iraq:

    "it's a disaster, people don't have electricity, water, garbage collection, sewage collection, jobs."

    After that she only repeats the mantra endlessly.

    By simply reading this you have now been to Iraq, too!

    Usually when I go someplace, I try to pick up a little more information. Makes me wonder if it was an airport layover or something. Maybe a drink at the bar in the Palestine.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs