Is the iPod Nano Too Small?

Yesterday, my 60 GB iPod Photo decided that it didn't want to interface with my PC anymore. I plugged in the USB cable and the screen on the iPod changed like it always does to say that it was connecting to the PC. The little USB device manager said that a portable hard drive was connected, but none of the IPod-specific programs would recognize my portable jukebox. iTunes wouldn't work. My Winamp iPod plugin didn't react. Even the factory program that is used to flash new software updates onto the IPod wouldn't recognize the device so that I could try to reset the IPod to factory settings. So, I couldn't update my iPod and I couldn't fix it.

Luckily for me, I have something of a backup. A couple of months ago I purchased an expensive piece of recording equipment on eBay and the seller threw in a free 4 GB IPod Nano to entice potential purchasers. Yesterday, when faced with not having any way to listen to my recorded radio shows in the car, I decided to free the li'l iPod from its shrink-wrapped sarcophagus. I plugged it in and away I went. The computer recognized it and, in no time, I had eight hours worth of programming in my pocket.

Sure, it is perplexing that the Nano had no problems connecting while my ginormous iPod wouldn't connect. (It is even more perplexing that the guy at the "Genius Bar" [blech!] at the Apple Store was able to get it working on one of the in-store Macs.) But that is not why I am writing this.

The reason that I am writing today is that I think we have finally hit the point where the form-factor is smaller than it needs to be. The first thing I noticed after getting this Nano up and running is that it is a burden to carry around, not because it is too big, but because it is too small.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for craig-lyndall

Article Author: Craig Lyndall

Craig Lyndall writes about all things related to Cleveland sports for WaitingForNextYear.com.

Visit Craig Lyndall's author pageCraig Lyndall's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Triniman

    Jun 13, 2006 at 10:30 pm

    I think I understand what you are saying. I'm waiting for the new ginormous iPod before I buy my first one, but I have marvelled at the Nano due to its size. The Nano is so small that I'm afraid I would break it. It seems really popular with the ladies, though.

  • 2 - Mat Brewster

    Jun 14, 2006 at 6:59 am

    It seems really popular with the ladies, though.

    That's just what they tell the little bitty nano to make him feel better. Meanwhile they are all gazing longingly at the big bad 60 gig video ipod.

  • 3 - Eddie

    Jun 14, 2006 at 10:50 am

    I made some similar, somewhat relevant comments in the past: onmy.opera.com

    I agree- it's time to focus instead on making the Nano more "useful" by focusing on cord management and usability. It's small enough.

  • 4 - Craig Lyndall

    Jun 14, 2006 at 10:54 am

    I have continued to think about this since writing it and the one great example that I keep coming up with is the mouse. Sure, they could keep reducing the size of it, but at some point there is an ergonomic benefit to keeping it sized so that it fits appropriately in most people's hands.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs