How Tall Was Goliath? Fun With Cubits

Part of: Fact of the Day

Just how long is a cubit? It depends on whom you ask. Noah’s cubit was somewhat longer than the Egyptian, Greek and Roman cubit. For Noah, the cubit was the measurement from his elbow to the tip of his middle (longest) finger. This inexact measurement likely caused great problems throughout the world, particularly in Africa, where a cubit could range anywhere from less than 12 inches (for pygmy cultures) to more than 36 inches (for the Watusi).

Most sources agree that a cubit in the Bible was equal to 21.8 inches, an Egyptian cubit was equal to 20.6 inches, a Greek cubit was equal to 18.3 inches, and a Roman cubit was equal to 17.5 inches.

To complicate things, there is another type of cubit. A “short” cubit is the length of the forearm, not including any part of the hand. Scholars believe that this unit was occasionally used in the Bible as well, as in the case of the height of Goliath. Said to be “six cubits and a span” tall, David’s target would have been nearly 11 feet tall using a regular cubit, but a more likely height of 6’ 9” using the “short” cubit. Because humans were shorter during ancient times, a man of that height could have been considered a giant, despite the fact that he would have had difficulty dunking on Patrick Ewing.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for mental_floss

Article Author: Mental_Floss

mental_floss magazine is where knowledge junkies get their fix. It's a fun blend of trivia, humor and everything you should've learned in school but didn't.

Visit Mental_Floss's author pageMental_Floss's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Vince

    Apr 11, 2010 at 9:08 am

    It sounds plausible, but I think the Bible really indicates a height of over 9ft. simply because the weight of his armor is said to be roughly 125 pounds. Add to that a 15 pound helmet, a 37 pound spear, and a shield of Zeus knows how much, we're talking several hundred pounds of equipment.
    By contrast, the full plate of medieval knights averaged around 50 lbs, the biggest swords no more than about 12 (most around 5lbs.), and shields weighing less than 15lbs, and a Halberd of around 9lbs.
    Now does it really sound credible for even a man of 6' 9" to be wielding several hundred pounds of equipment and being able to fight?
    (That was an honest question by the way. If you think yes, please give reasons why.)
    Thanks for your time.

  • 2 - Joey

    Jul 13, 2012 at 6:43 pm

    Medically, a man over 7'6", in modern times or any time would be suffering from giantism (whatever the word is), and is weaker, by far, than a man of a more normal functional height like 6' to 6'6". I'm 5'8" myself and am built to handle heavier weights as far as pushing/carrying around, than men much taller than myself. Although if he were a true giant, like a different race or almost a different species, then I guess a 10'+ height could explain the heavy weights of those weapons. I figure I couldn't throw a 37 pound spear far enough to kill anything other than my own foot.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs