While Microsoft's Home Server is looking like a very nice product, its pricing is still unknown, and it's potentially not going to be a great fit for non-Windows environments. Linux desktops, or even Mac OS based computers, would probably get along much better with Bubba. Philosophically at least, I can see Mac and Linux users being happier with Bubba sitting under their desk than a Home Server (it's a Microsoft product, after all). In fact, it surprises me that Apple haven't made anything like Bubba as of yet; a device that plugs straight into your network and offers you easy file backups, email, and all Bubba's other features would make a lot of sense. That said, there's a good chance it would be a lot less flexible than Bubba. However, Home Server does have its own brand of fault tolerance in its favour, which is something that Bubba doesn't have. If you store a set of files on Bubba and the disk dies, chances are you're going to lose that data. As a result, Bubba is perhaps best used for storing non-essential files, and as a second home for your most important data such as family photos, videos, and documents.
To achieve this, it's easy to use a tool (such as Microsoft's free SyncToy) to automatically mirror folders from your computers onto Bubba. Used like this; as a transparent, invisible backup of your most essential documents, Bubba could save your bacon. I tested this configuration during my time with the device, and it worked flawlessly.
Bubba doesn't do anything a full-sized PC can't; you can implement every single feature, including all the web management, by installing a Linux distribution and throwing in a few apps. But there are a few important things to consider: the first I've already mentioned; Bubba does all of this out of the box, with little or no config. There's no setup to work through, no packages to install, and no command line to master (unless you want to).
I've mentioned the second thing too: it's quiet. Whisper quiet would probably be an accurate way of describing it.
Thirdly, and probably most importantly, Bubba does all this while consuming under 10 watts of power. While downloading a few torrents, my Bubba was using about 8 watts. To put this in perspective: my desktop computer, a Core 2 Duo Intel machine, uses about 150 watts of power while doing the same thing. My old Dell 8400 uses more. And my server (a big old IBM beastie) consumes 200 - 250 watts of power while doing its thing. That's a huge difference, with serious environmental and financial implications. I've convinced myself in the past that I need that IBM monster for a variety of things, most significantly Push Email, but knowing that Bubba can do many of the same things using so little power has really made me start to re-evaluate the situation. In other words, I've started to think about ways to get rid of the power hungry beast in my garage.








Article comments
1 - Mark
Much cheaper to purchase a small $100 computer and install your own Linux.
2 - copyrightlaw
Good review. I myself would probably install something like BackupPC on that machine (since it uses Debian) as well.
3 - Daniel Woolstencroft
Mark - cheaper in the short term, possibly. But I doubt you'd get a small $100 computer that runs at 10w power consumption? If you had something in mind, I'd love to hear about it!
copyrightlaw - thanks for the link, I'll have a look at that.
4 - whaxiac
Whax is another of the 310 LiveCDroms and I move through them with ease, for the children's computers, and at schools and businesses.
Favorite distros right now, for complete fulfillment with 5500 free programs and games, are PCLinuxos.com and Mepis
Virus free, immune to the "114,000 Microsoft Virus Definitions", and devoid of the "Convicted Felon Microsoft Trusted Partner" protection racket, they can run in the CDrom, or load in about 20 minutes.
5 - M.N
Is a nice box but that is not all. To make it reliable a UPS is necessary and what about when the ISP crushes? Home Web server is not such a good ideea
6 - tazzz
Thats why you have 2 isps, a fast cable, and cheap slower adsl for ex.
But for a webserver only, it is probably better to have it hosted somewhere ..