Anti-Spam Act Ignored, Ridiculed?

Well, here's a sorry state of affairs:

  • The newly passed Anti-Spam Act in the United States is being universally ignored, according to at least one survey.
  • The Act is being almost ridiculed in some quarters as being ineffective at best, and at worst giving "spam gangs" a cloak of legitimacy.
  • And to top everything off, the Act has burdened legitimate businesses with yet another layer of legal requirements, it now appears.
  • According to the Spamhaus Project, 90% of spam received in North America and Europe comes from a hard-core group of 200 spam outfits. The vast majority of spam you receive in your inbox is NOT coming from legitimate companies trying to sell their products — it's from this "Gang of 200."

    If that's accurate, then the Anti-Spam Act has just added an unnecessary regulatory burden to legitimate businesses in the U.S. who were not the problem in the first place.

    But never fear. In typical American entrepreneurial fashion, the Anti-Spam Act could be a boon for some small businesses, including (1) companies offering services that will be of much more practical use than the new law to help filter out spam, and (2) service providers such as marketing consultants and lawyers offering to help the legitimate marketers comply with the new law.

    This post is adapted from one that first appeared in Small Business Trends, the author's weblog.

    Article tags

    Spread the word
    Bookmark and Share
    Profile image for anita-campbell

    Article Author: Anita Campbell

    Anita Campbell is the Editor of the award-winning Small Business Trends (www.smallbiztrends.com) website and host of her own talk radio program, Small Business Trends Radio, on the WSRadio.com Internet network.

    Visit Anita Campbell's author pageAnita Campbell's Blog

    Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
    • No image found
    • No image found
    • No image found

    Article comments

    • 1 - Hal Pawluk

      Jan 15, 2004 at 8:45 pm

      The problem with the CAN-SPAM act is that it is, as someone else first said, the "Yes-you-CAN-SPAM" act.

      I've been arguing against it since it first was floated a couple of years or so ago. It was never going to do any good, and the only real thing it has accomplished is that it preempted stronger state laws.

      But, of course, the politicians can now point with pride in the next election, since no one will really know what it's about.

    Add your comment, speak your mind

    Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
    Please read our comment policy.
    Please preview your comment.

    blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

    fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

    fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

    most comments Most comments in 24hrs

    top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

    top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs