Today on Blogcritics
Home » Culture and Society » Satire: Animal Farm Revisited, An Interlude

Satire: Animal Farm Revisited, An Interlude

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Let me indroduce you to our one-act play and the dramatis personæ. There is a peacock in all his splendor, henceafter referred to as “Mr. Dandy”; “Billy,” a sheep who imagines himself a goat; an ordinary housefuly fly called “Tsetse” for its peskiness extraordinaire; and a mongrel of some kind, nicknamed “Alien” right after he had stumbled into the compound unannounced, from whence, no one really knows. Needless to say, our characters will require a prompter lest the play degenerate into a sequence of unruly monologues, and that’s where yours truly comes in. In keeping with the literary tradition, any resemblance to real person or persons is purely coincidental.

Concerning “Tactician” (the compound commander),a gossip monger called “Troublemaker,” and a little piglet named “Squealer”

(Scene of action, the compound auditorium. It’s a monthly meeting to discuss community affairs. The hall is half-full, some are barely attentive, others just dozing off. Mr. Dandy decides to energize the audience by addressing a matter of vital importance.)

MR. DANDY: I don’t know about y’all, but there are nasty rumors circulating about, rumors concerning unjust treatment of Squealer at the hands of the compound authorities. I’d like be put ‘em to rest. As far as I’m concerned, there’s nothing to discuss. He broke the law and that’s all there’s to it. If you don’t want to do the time, don’t do the crime.

(“Ey ey,” Mr. Dandy’s oration is punctuated with isolated sounds of approval from disparate parts of the hall, Mr. Dandy’s diehard supporters. The rest, shaken from the usual lethargy which accompanies the monthly meetings, remain ummoved. More to enliven the debate than to challenge Mr. Dandy’s claims, the Prompter steps in.)

THE PROMPTER: So what? Laws were made to be broken, especially when they’re unjust. Remember when we’ve all gone on strike because of reduced food rations and inhumane working conditions? That was right after the Horse collapsed from sheer exhaustion. If it weren’t for that, you’d still be an ordinary chicken, pecking your way into oblivion, scrounging for grains to make it into the next day, always at the mercy of your master feeder. There’d be no luster to your feathers, no pride which comes so naturally to you. Or how ‘bout when we complained about some of the animals being mistreated simply because they looked queer, too exotic for ordinary taste? Have you forgotten? 

(There is some stirring in the crowd, uneasy shifting of feet and body parts, the fluttering of wings, a growing awareness of a confrontation ahead, an unusual occurrence at these gatherings. Mr. Dandy’s supporters don’t utter a sound. They wait to see in which direction the argument is going.)

MR. DANDY: Of course I haven’t forgotten. But this law is different because it concerns the well-being of our entire community. It’s designed to provide for our safety and internal security. It’s for the benefit of all of us, and anyone who breaks it is guilty as charged because he’s the enemy of the animal folk, each and everyone of us. Your analogy is ridiculous.

(The peanut gallery shows further signs of awakening. There is growing restlessness in the air. Now they know a confrontation is on. Mr. Dandy’s loyalists continue to bide their time.)

THE PROMPTER: OK, imprison him if you must so long as we can guarantee him speedy trial, but why subject him to inhumane conditions, like denying him the mud to wallow in or the customary darkness? For a piglet like Squealer it’s cruel and unusual punishment. I call it torture. You know full well that the idea behind it is to get to Troublemaker, to implicate him in a crime against the compound. So why do you condone the mistreatment of Squealer in the name of what you call the greater good? In particular, why do you condone the actions of Tactitan and his goon squad, the Doberman Pinschers whom you yourself so fear? Why do you condone Tactician’s iron rule after we’ve been promised a gentler, kinder compound? That’s why we deposed Napoleon the Tyrant, remember? because we all believed, Tactician had assured us, things would be different.

(Mr. Dandy shows signs of consternation. He didn’t expect a rebuttal, let alone direct challenge to his well-crafted argument. All peacocks are fastidious by nature, but Mr. Dandy was the king of the roost. His command of facts was legendary, his opinions rarely if ever questioned. Many an animal have been known to travel far and wide from distant farms and compounds to seek his advice. His color was turning purple. He was beginning to look like a turkey.)

MR. DANDY: I’m not all that certain about Troublemaker. From what I’ve heard, he’s a shifty critter, a real sleezebag. Has been known to travel from compound to compound spreading rumors and innuendos. Lots of animals have already got in trouble because of his irresponsible behavior, and many more will, count on that. Besides, imagine the gall! He doesn’t as much as lift a finger towards his upkeep, expects other animals to feed him and clothe him while he’s galivanting about from compound to compound, spreading dangerous ideas. And then, there are tales of sexual impropriety involving …

THE PROMPTER: What has this got to do with the price of chicken feed? We’re not here to discuss Troublemaker’s personal life or character, only the disclosures. Aren’t we better off as a result of knowing Tactician was in cahoots with the commanders of compounds we haven’t even heard of in order to strenghten the home rule and thwart all potential attacks by the Dissenters? We’ve been supporting tyrants like our own Napoleon, whom we deposed for the very crimes we now condone. Doesn’t it concern you that Tactician – a real chameleon he is, isn’t he? – is implicated in supporting regimes against which we ourselves have rebelled? Don’t you care that the animals in other compounds suffer the very same indignities we ourselves have once suffered? You speak of dangerous ideas. Dangerous to whom? To us or to Tactitian and all he represents?

MR. DANDY: You’re putting words in my mouth. I believe I made it clear I’m ambivalent about this whole thing. Granted, some good may come as a result of Troublemaker’s activities; still, some innocents may suffer, perhaps even lose their lives.

THE PROMPTER: You must be kidding! What innocents? No one is innocent when they promote a tyrannical rule, and that includes Tactician as well. You take comfort in saying we all stand to benefit from a policy which elevates internal security above all else, even if it means supporting tyrannical regimes elsewhere. Well, try this one for size. Our own Squealer is being denied everyday creature comforts that we would extend even to a stranger. And why? Simply because we want to implicate Troublemaker for soliciting information rather than obtaining it for a song, and bring him to justice on charges of terrorism and inciting insurrection. Meanwhile, we’re violating the very laws we ourselves have sworn to uphold, and yes, with respect to our own citizens like Squeeler. Don’t you see the contradiction, Mr. Dandy? So yes, we’ve become the same militaristic regime many of us paid with our dear lives to overthrow. Tactician promised things would be better. “Hope & change” was his campaign slogan, and we elected him on the strength of it. Some change! Meanwhile, Mr. Dandy, your ambivalence speaks volumes.

(It was obvious Mr. Dandy was in no condition to continue. He looked aimelessly about, trying to make eye contact with anyone and everyone, hoping to elicit however slight show of support, a nod here, a wink there, but to no avail. Even his loyal supporters avoided him like a plague. In total exasperation, he just flathered his wings and pecked at his feathers. The grooming was a ritual. Billy the Sheep couldn’t take it any longer. He couldn’t bear seeing his leader humiliated so. He rose from his seat and stepped up to the podium, demanding to be heard. The chair acknowledged.

Now, for those of you who don’t know, Billy was only second to Mr. Dandy in his command of facts; his memory was reputed to be phenomenal and his oratorical skills, second to none. He could go on to no end with his long-winded arguments and QEDs. To his partners in crime, it was music to their ears, but to his captive audience, anathema. The trouble with Billy, he was rarely if ever on point. He knew about football, though. He knew that offense was the best defense, and he perfected that skill to a T, even if it meant derailing the discussion beyond any recognition, which was more often than not. His greatest fault, however, he imagined himself another Don Quixote fighting windmills and erecting strawmen in the most unlikely of places, always blaming the opposition for any real or imaginary social ills, never the party in power. To Billy, the party in power never had enough power.

The upshot was, Billy was an apologist par excellence, and Tactician was his hero. If Tactician couldn’t get it done, it simply meant it couldn’t be done, not by a human, an animal, a vegetable, or a mineral. It was as simple as that. Which was the gist of Billy’s political philosophy: since the opposition was always formidable, the only obstacle to attaining true animal happiness the world over, compromise was the only way of getting anything done, and the results were never going to be perfect. And Tactician was the master of compromise, which is why Billy loved him so. In a nutshell, Billy was an utter conformist, which is why all the animals named him so, after a sheep that would be goat. Only on those in his inner circle was this irony lost; to them, he was a real goat, a goat in sheep’s clothing, and an impeccable warrior besides.)

BILLY: I strongly object to your treatment of Mr. Dandy. You make it sound as though Mr. Dandy or anyone else was personally responsible for the state of affairs in this compound or elsewhere. Don’t forget, we’re still under the specter of the old rule by Napoleon the Tyrant. Tactician’s doing what’s humanly possible, more than what’s humanly possible, to get us over the hump, but it can’t be done overnight. Moreover, I resent your insinuation that I, Billy, condone a militaristic style of regime either here or elsewhere. I dare you to disprove me. Show me when and where have I ever condoned imperialism, I dare you! Still, Tactician must have his reasons, and it’s not for us to inquire or to question because we’re ignorant of all the facts. You have no idea the kind of opposition he faces day in and day out just to put oats on our table, fresh water in our trough, a straw roof over our heads. Remember, it’s been fixed last year for leaks. And you know as well as I that we haven’t been attacked by hostile hordes of late. We’ve been able to sleep nights in relative peace and security, so there must be something he’s doing right. Admit it! Furthermore …

(Billy just had to be cut short. If he didn’t invent the art of filibuster, he was certainly the master. His diatriabes could go on forever, and the audience, barely awaken from its dogmatic slumber, was showing clear signs of retiring for the rest of the night. Billy’s speeches, besides, were like an old hat, tailor-made for every conceivable occasion. If you heard one, you’ve heard them all.)

THE PROMPTER: Get a grip, Billy! No one has accused you of anything … yet. Your name hasn’t even been mentioned in the course of these proceedings, check the minutes and see. But since we’re on topic, let me pose a perfectly innocent question, the same I posed to Mr. Dandy. Since you’re so much against militaristic regimes as a matter of principle, why don’t you speak out now and then against this one? If you’re so much opposed to enhanced interrogation techniques, why don’t you speak out on behalf of Squealer, one of our own, and condemn Tactician for making use of them, whatever his reasons? If you object so much to the kind of governance we’ve all experienced under Napoleon the Tyrant, why don’t you bellow from the mountaintops against the present regime for continuing the very same policies we’ve all once abhored. It’s not I but your silence that condemns you, Billy. You had a perfect opportunity to break your silence once Mr. Dandy was done delivering his oratory. So what did you do? Instead of making a stand for the right, you took Mr. Dandy’s side. So forgive me, Billy, if I take your protestations with a grain debris. It’s just words, and they sure sound empty and hollow.

(There was no sense letting Billy continue; it would be more of the same, endless variation on the same tired theme, and it would turn into a marathon besides. Even his supporters were getting antsy, eager to spare him further humiliation and embarassment because it would reflect badly. Billy was OK and they all reveled in his oratory, but he had a nasty habit they all tried to cure him of, of putting a hoof in his mouth by way of finalizing his points. That, plus his sancimonius airs which annoyed the living manure of those less disposed to overlook his antics.

Tsetse the Fly demanded immediate attention, circling menacingly about the podium, making it clear to all concerned it was her turn to speak, and that was that. Since she was a pest the likes of which none have encountered before, dissent was out of the question. She was always liable to land on your face and park there, as was her habit, at the slightest sign of provocation. Her screeching, highly-ondulated pitch was punishment enough without having to bear the repulsive presence.)

TSETSE: What I’d like to know is how come the name “Tactician” took hold in the first place. If memory serves, it was Barnie the Ox who started the rumors, saying that by virtue of his training and life experience in settling disputes, Hussy the Chameleon should be renamed “Tactian.” I objected from the start, saying it was asanine. It wasn’t a personal attack, mind you, just told Barnie in no uncertain terms that his were the words of a fool. To no avail, for the name stuck. Which tells me most of you don’t care for the Chameleon or you wouldn’t be referring to him by such a derogatory name. So yes, Barnie the Ox had started this whole thing, pox be on him, and he made no pretense about it. He openly dislikes the chameleon’s nature, always trying to blend in, said so himself. Barnie is a prejudiced critter, pure and simple, and you all fell for what surely is character assasination. And on what authority? The words of a dumb, simple-minded ox n moron!

THE PROMPTER: Irrelevant, Tsetse! What difference does it make by what name we call him? You can call him “Herr Fuhrer” for all I care, or by any other name you desire. And what makes you think “Tactician” is a derogatory term? As far as I am concerned, it depicts the chameleon’s MO to the tinest detail. It’s an apt term as far as it goes, not at all derogatory except in your feverish imagination. You had better retire, Tsetse, before someone be tempted to swat you. I can’t guarantee for your safety while you insist on being your obnoxious self.

(There was still Alien to contend with, the last of Mr. Dandy’s circle of diehards. Alien had a permanent chip on his shoulder, his trademark. Easily irritable, always on a lookout for insults from any and all quarters even when there were none, he was always prone to blowing his stack at the slightest of provocations, yelp all manner of obcenities and whatnots in vengeful retaliation, over-the-top reprisals, and then retire to his doghouse for days on end, swearing not to come out till the hell freezes over. He’d even refuse the food that was put in his bowl by some kind-hearted animal for fear he might stick to his word and starve himself to death. Invariably, a morsel or two were gone, and so was some of the fresh water procured for him in a separate container, barely touched but never quite to the exact same level to which it was originally filled. All the animals monitored this slow, painstaking progress with intense interest, eyeing the quantity of food and drink consumed, and the leftovers, on a daily basis. Some were taking bets. As chance would have it. Alien would always reemerge from his self-imposed confinement but truth be told, one could never be certain. And every time he’d do so, ready to face the unfriendly and hostile world one more time, he was never the same, always diminished in some way. We all sensed that and felt sorry for him. We understood he was a victim of his own devices, a vicious circle he simply couldn’t escape, like in the ballad Jimmy the Crow would rhapsodize about, that compound in some land down yonder where they’d first welcome you with open arms but then, once you checked in, wouldn’t let you leave. We symphatized, of course, but only to a point. We knew Alien could be vindictive if he set his mind to it, even lucid at times, like an alcoholic experiencing a moment of clarity when sober, for which reason we couldn’t altogether dismiss him.)

ALIEN: Everybody knows I’m not from here, which is why I can be objective, more objective in any case than most of you. Well, let me tell you, for all its faults, this compound has all others beat by a country mile, and I’m not exaggerating either. You ought to witness first-hand the kind of indignities our kind suffers to this very day before you voice your disapproval. I know because Ive been there, in more places you can imagine. Why do you think I ended up here? To escape persecution and mistreatment, that’s why! In a way, you’re no different than the rest of them, picking on me because I’m not pure breed, always finding fault, putting me down because my fur don’t shine, or because I look crazy-eyed or speak with an accent. Most of you despise me, I know it. But I’ve found some friends here, real compadres, in Mr. Dandy, Billy and Tsetse. If it weren’t for them, I’d be out of here in a New York minute, looking for a kinder master. But they gave me courage to stick through thick and thin, built me a doghouse, insulated me from your insults. I’ve got to be grateful.

THE PROMPTER: Get to the point, Alien. We’ve all heard your spiel about how we mistreat you and all that, and truth be told, we’re tired of it. Most of it, anyway, is in your own head, so get on with it, chump. Do you have anything to add to this conversation, or is it going to be just another one of your bitch sessions?

ALIEN: What I was going to say if you’d only let me, you don’t know your shit from shinola. I’ve been around so I know, This compound, though not perfect, is a far cry from anything I’ve ever encountered. You should consider yourselves lucky instead of badmouthing it. Sure, Tactician has his faults, who hasn’t? but for intents and purposes, he’d delivered a community that, by all standards, is only to be emulated, as perfect as can be. So don’t be telling me about my bitching or be putting me down. It’s you, most of you in fact, who are bitching. Sorry to say, but I’m passionate about politics. It’s all personal to me. I live it and breathe it every moment of my waking life. How couldn’t I since my very presence and your resentment make it imperative that I stay on my toes, always on the defensive? Except for my friends here whom I mentioned, each of you poses an existential threat. In plain and simple terms, you just don’t like me. You treat me as though I had rabies.

THE PROMPTER: I won’t argue with you, Alien, nor will I try to cure you of your paranoia. I have no idea whence you came from, none of us do, and you haven’t been helfpful either by keeping your vow of silence. I’ve no idea what you’ve gone through, so I won’t pass judgment on you. Tell me this, however. You say you’re passionate about politics, that it’s all-personal to you, and it’s all to the good. All of us should be because politics is important. Why didn’t you jump in, then, when Mr. Dandy, Billy and Tsetse, all three of them, have gone out of their way to excuse the existing state of affairs? Why didn’t you bark in disapproval? “Personal” means immediate to me, something that’s a matter of a pressing, if not ultimate, concern. Most everybody thinks so. What’s the cash value of your claim that politics is personal to you, that you live it and breathe it every moment of your miserable existence while you fail to register a protest when it really counts? It seems hypocritical to me, Alien, nothing but grandstanding. The only other conclusion I can draw, you don’t know your own mind.

There are definte goalposts in political science, the values we all hold dear and to which we aspire – equality under the law being one of them, a level playing field is another. And I could add to this list at will. But none of them are subjective for being personal, as you say, or for holding a personal and deep-seated attachment to any of them. They’re as objective as the sun that shines on you, the food you eat, or the water you drink. There is no contradiction here, only commitment. So what say you? Are you for it or are you against?

(Alien came prepared. He looked through his briefcase and in no time produced a stack of documents, presumably testitying to his ever-progressive stance. He insited they be admitted as evidence. He said he had written extensively on the subject whilst he was being despised (which was “most of the time,” his own words). He pleaded with the assembly, saying he was no ordinary flunkie but a true revolutionary, always dogged about universal justice and freedom for all. Aside from yelping, it was his only passion in life.)

THE PROMPTER: All right, Alien, we’ll make it part of the record. For future reference, however, let me give you a word of advice. Action speaks louder than words. Loyalty to your friends is fine, but not when you keep silent while they utter half-truths or outright lies. Truth should be your only guide and master. You’ll find that when you act more on the strength of your convictons and worry less about pleasing everyone, you might be a happier puppy. You might even regain some of the respect you crave for.

(Billy was fidgeting nervously in his seat, bellowing the usual baahs and guttural soumds which only a sheep can make, sounds which, out of courtesy to the ear, we can’t reproduce here, but which, nonetheless, conveyed unmistakable signs of derision and outright protest. The look of desparation in his eyes, looking wildly on and about for a sympathetic ear but finding none, it was obvious he wanted to be recognized. Not even Billy should be reduced to such a miserable condition, so I consented.

THE PROMPTER: OK, Billy, what is it this time? Be quick, however, because we’re about to close. We still haven’t had our lousy supper.

BILLY: I just wanted to say you’re against Tactician because of his pigmentation. Which is the same reason why you’re against Alien, because he’s different. You’re all racists and you should be ashamed of yourselves.

THE PROMPTER: We’ve heard it all before, Billy. Good night, everybody. This meeting is adjourned.

Powered by

About Roger Nowosielski

  • Jordan Richardson

    Enjoyed the read, Roger.

    The most troubling thing about the monthly meeting of these animals is not the showiness of the peacock or the deluded nature of the sheep or the “peskiness” of the fly or even the yelping of the mongrel (a character I have a particular affinity for, for some reason…).

    No, the most disturbing and compelling part of these little tale is the incessant need of the Prompter, designed apparently to “enliven the debate, to belittle and dominate the animals as they discuss their affairs. It seems to me that his need to dominate and control the animals’ speech rivals even that of the compound’s commander, Tactician. The only difference between the two is, best I can tell, nobody elected the Prompter to his post.

  • http://takeitorleaveit.typepad.com/ roger nowosielski

    Quite right, Jordan. This piece is hardly artful — would have to sit on it much longer to reach the literary mark so as to acquire more subtlety and lose some its crudeness. But it was sitting in my computer, unattended, for over two month, so I decided to finally let it fizzle out.

  • http://takeitorleaveit.typepad.com/ roger nowosielski

    I apologize, BTW, for a whole bunch of spelling errors, soon to be corrected by the editor once they’re up.

    Which should be a lesson to all concerned. It’s a bad idea to submit one’s articles late at night. It poses undue stress on both the writer and the editor.

  • charles richardson

    I like!

  • http://thingsalongtheway.blogspot.com/ Cindy

    HIya Roger. I am in the process of reading this. It’s interesting but I am weary and it’s late and I’ve miles yet to go…yadda yadda…

    I want your opinion on this new turn: The joining of the occupation by marines and police (link is all the background articles you could want). These are their sites: occupypolice.org (only 3 days old, if you get an error just reload a few times) and occupymarines.org

  • http://takeitorleaveit.typepad.com/ roger nowosielski

    Cool sites, Cindy. Now, this is the kind of co-opting I’m all for.

  • http://thingsalongtheway.blogspot.com/ Cindy

    Roger,

    @Occupypolice apparently held a GA tonight from 8-9pm on twitter. That would have been interesting to see. I will try to check the site and see if they do it again.

  • http://takeitorleaveit.typepad.com/ roger nowosielski

    Indeed it would be,. Keep me posted. Meanwhile, I’m mending fences with some of my so-called “enemies,” and I like it.

%d bloggers like this: