Today on Blogcritics
Home » Review: Underworld

Review: Underworld

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

UnderworldOk, I know I said in a recent comment that I wasn’t going to bother watching this film, but I changed my mind. So sue me.

I actually tried to watch this the other day, but the first 10 minutes led me to believe that I was about to waste the following 110 minutes of my life, which could be better spent say, reorganizing the garage. But, I did have it home from Netflix, and the wife and daughter were out, so I figured what the heck… it might make for a good napping opportunity.

Imagine my suprise when I found this to be the first movie I’ve seen that breaks my “if the first 10 minutes stink the entire movie will stink” rule. Now understand that I’m talking strictly “popcorn flick” level here, and nothing beyond that, but for what it was, it actually got better as it progressed.

Either that or I just became numb to the whole thing.

The plot is actually fairly interesting (and might have made for a better film if done by a different group of people): Werewolves and vampires have been at war for 600 years and the vampires are winning. Our hero(ine) is Selene (played by fanboy favorite Kate Beckinsdale), a soldier-class vampire who enjoys her work and is actually getting melancholy over the fact that there are so few werewolves left to dispatch.

Underworld opens with a number of shots that told me immediately that this movie was going to be totally and completely style over substance. Don’t ask me how, it’s a gift. Don’t get me wrong: it does look cool, but after a while too much frosting and not enough cake just isn’t very appetizing.

High on the “cool factor” is a shot right at the beginning where Selene drops about 150 ft from the top of a building. They show it in two shots, a long one from the top and a shorter one from about 20 ft off the ground down to where she lands decisively in a crouch. From there it’s an on-foot chase scene down into a subway where Selene and a couple of partners are following two guys who one can only assume (correctly) to be werewolves. The action is so fast and furious and the characters (with one exception) all look so similar, that it was hard for me to keep track of who was doing what to whom.

Lots of gunfire and gadgetry in use (old weapons don’t cut it anymore, don’t you know) as Selene wanders through an old sewer system chasing baddies. At one point we see (and Selene hears) a bunch of guys watching two werewolves battling it out. Turns out that it’s kind of a werewolf “Fight Club”, which does not impress their leader once he arrives on scene.

Selene returns to the vampire mansion, which once inside reminded me of a scene from Eyes Wide Shut with people sitting and lying around decadently. She suspects that the werewolves (who are referred to throughout the film as “Lycans”, which I suppose sounds more hip) were after a human: a med student named Michael Corvin (played by Scott Speedman) for reasons unknown. The current leader of the vampires (make that leader of the “Coven”… more hipness), doesn’t believe a word of what she says. Members of the coven think she’s infatuated with Michael, but of course it turns out that he is a key factor in the long-running war.

Underworld starts out as an MTV/Technopunk kind of movie but does at some point rise (slightly) above that. It’s certainly no Blade, but except for some boring stretches it did manage to entertain. Unfortunately this was in production when The Matrix was the big thing, and it draws from that film heavily as far as visuals: Form-fitting black leather and long coats are everywhere, lots of wirework in the stunts, and even one scene reminiscent of Neo waking up in his gooey pod in the Matrix.

Towards the end the action turns pretty non-stop, with the exception of the film intermittently cutting to Michael strapped to a table trying to get free. It was very odd and out of place as they cut to that multiple times. Kind of reminded me of the scene from Monty Python and the Holy Grail where during the “Knights of the Round Table” sequence they cut to the old guy hanging in the dungeon and clapping his hands.

Kate Beckinsale actually handled herself quite well, doing most of her own stunts and conveying some “don’t mess with me” attitude and playing it straight as opposed to tongue in cheek or just plain over the top. About the only other actor that impressed me was Kevin Grevioux in the role of Raze, who was basically an enforcer/bouncer kind of throwaway character, but really stood out whenever he was onscreen. Kevin was also one of the guys who came up with the story, and I was stunned to hear that his unbelievably deep, echo chamber-like voice was not computer enhanced!

Overall, just call it a guilty pleasure that might go down easier with a couple of beers under your belt.

Quite gory for what the director claims is actually an action film, it definitely earns it’s R-rating.

For more incredibly insightful movie reviews visit ScreenRant.com.

Powered by

About Vic

  • Eric Olsen

    SR, very well-done review, thanks! We saw it a couple of weeks ago on cable and had the same mixed feelings, basically coming out on he positive side. Re the plot, it was actually the most interesting aspect and the twists and turns about who constituted the “bad guys” turned enough times to keep my interest as well as head swimming by that time of night.

    Beckinsale was quite good, as was Michael Sheen as the Lycan leader, and Bill Nighy as Beckinsale’s mentor. Shane Brolly as Kraven, the temporary head of the vamps was actually quite awful, dragging the movie down in a key role.

    The other thing it succeeded in doing was make me think about some of the practical implications of immortality and the imperative of the survival of the species.

  • http://screenrant.com Vic

    Thanks Eric. Yeah I agree that Shane’s performance was pretty bad. Kind of soap opera-ish.

    Vic

  • http://filmateur.blogspot.com John Lars Ericson

    Nice review, SR!

    Kate Beckinsale was surprisingly well-cast for this, although I thought the movie itself was headache-inducing. I guess I just tire of that blue-and-black dreary color scheme.

  • Eric Olsen

    it WAS very moody

  • http://www.temptationwaits.com visualsimplicity

    I enjoyed this film too (mostly because I’m a fanboy of Kate Beckinsale). However, I can see why people wouldn’t like it. I had mixed feelings about the movie too (but because of Beckinsale, it tipped towards positive–which I can’t really say about Van Helsing, her presence couldn’t exactly save that film).

    Regardless, I was mostly interested in the history, backstory, and world that was created from this movie if anything else. I guess you could say I enjoyed the film more for it’s potential rather than any actual product (which is odd). It’s a rich world, much like Blade, Matrix or any other sci-fi-ish thing, and I can only hope in the long run (in one of the sequels) there’d be something spectacular to come from it.

  • Eric Olsen

    good point Vis, I was trying to say the same thing about the world it created, but movie-wise it wasn’t all there