Today on Blogcritics
Home » Review ‘em and Weep: Yellow Dog by Martin Amis

Review ‘em and Weep: Yellow Dog by Martin Amis

Please Share...Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

I not only had to read ‘em, and weep, I reviewed ‘em as I reviled ‘em. With a paycheck, a deadline, and a commitment to a major metropolitan newspaper at stake, I had to, at times, summon some seemingly superhuman strength to simply turn a page. All that unshirkable responsibility pretty much eliminates the option of tossing the book mid-tome across the room, telling all who would inquire that my dog ate my book — and he quite enjoyed it. Stupid mutt.

Though most books were rewarding, or at least had some redeeming qualities, a few books in particular — ones I would’ve gladly pummeled into puppy-chow pulp — never made it to Fido the Philistine’s dish while I unwillingly attempted to fulfill my contractual obligations. I don't want to point a finger, but… oh why not, I will name names: Among those books bound for inglorious reception was perhaps — no, absolutely the worst of the lot — Martin Amis’ Yellow Dog.

Maybe my expectations were too high. With such previous novels as London Fields, The Information, and The Night Train, Amis' wit-whittled woe of bons mots over bonhomie marked his sardonic and misanthropic tales of misery and imagination, smacking of a postmodern Algonquin and malice in a wonderland of cranky perversity and stinging, nihilistic cynicism. Get warm and fuzzy somewhere else; down these novelistic rabbit holes lies a rabidly unwholesome world where a Nabokovian love of language reigns supreme over sometimes sketchy stories and even sketchier characters, often by design.

But 2003’s Yellow Dog is bursting with failed, scattershot send-ups and wide-ranging ruminations on marriage, violence, airline terror, Hollywood, pornography, incest, tabloid journalism, and a bizarro-world royal family. The rudderless arbitrariness and the sound and fury and all that that signifies is encapsulated early on in one character's plaint: "He sniffed the essential wrongness of the air, with its fucked-up undertaste, as if all the sequiturs had been vacuumed out of it. A yellow-world of faith and fear, and paltry ingenuity. And all of us just flying blind."

The kaleidoscopic consequences are more trouble than it’s worth to untangle, however. Worse yet, the expected redeeming wit and patented flashes of stylistic flourishes are few and far between. Amis seems to be groping for commentary on such concerns as male violence, the tenuousness of relationships and family bonds, and changing morality in a new millennium, but the reach exceeds such grasping at straws. While some of the loose ends are tied and disparate subplots sloppily reconciled, it's too little, too late for a work too ludicrous for words.

Powered by

About Gordon Hauptfleisch

  • RC

    So let me get this straight – “Yellow Dog” has been out for a few years and you just now get around to providing a paltry review that, at best, is a re-hash of those provided by other reviewer/hacks? In the four years that it’s been out, many readers have come to the realization that YD is not a bad read, after all, and are no longer jumping on the bandwagon of superior-seeming generalizations. Can’t you do any better? Any two paragraphs of YD are better written than this review. Can you at least get the grammar straight in your opener? Sheesh.

  • http://www.gohah.blogspot.com Gordon L Hauptfleisch

    Sheesh, RC: You might want to get clear on the concept of this feature, which is devoted to bad books ever read at any time. I did originally write a review on Yellow Dog before it came out and reviewed by many. Get a clue.