Today on Blogcritics
Home » Requiem for the Acronym

Requiem for the Acronym

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on Twitter0Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on TumblrShare on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

As every England football fan knows, the team’s 2006 World Cup campaign was torpedoed by the distracting presence of all those WAGs (wives and girlfriends) wafting round Baden-Baden. A couple of years later, an anonymous poster on The Guardian website suggested that a more appropriate, much ruder, acronym for those credit-card toting time-wasters could be derived from the description “Trophy Wives and Tarts”. Think about it.

Welcome to the wacky world of the acronym. One minute you have a fun, tabloid-friendly and only mildly dismissive term for Victoria Beckham, Cheryl Tweedy and the rest of the gang. Then, before you can say paparazzi, an aspiring wag (i.e. witty person) tries to tarnish our memories of those golden days with a suggestion that is much too anatomical.

Acronyms have only been around since 1943, when a man from Bell Laboratories wanted to formally recognise the practice of taking a bunch of initial letters and creating a new and more succinct word like sonar (sound navigation and ranging). It worked. Who even remembers now that scuba (a slightly earlier invention) refers to self-contained underwater breathing apparatus?

I can’t comment on the effectiveness of SWAT (special weapons and tactics) teams, but as an acronym it definitely gets the job done. A macho paramilitary unit can be condensed into a real four-letter word that actually means “a sharp or violent blow”. A unit calling itself PAT or TAP wouldn’t inspire much in the way of shock and awe, would it?

SWAT, ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) and PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are examples of what I would call “A-list” acronyms. A body or organization gets a short, memorable name that also has the virtue of sounding relevant. Unfortunately, the 21st-century mania for condensing everything into bite- (or even byte-) sized chunks, means that acronyms and initialisms are both proliferating and dumbing down. So, to borrow a popular initialism, I worry that it may soon be a case of RIP (Requiescat In Pace) for the acronym.

Brevity is everything in this age of non-stop texting, tweeting, instant messaging and Facebooking. But we don’t just need ways to shorten the long-winded names of government departments, sporting bodies or scientific terms. Regular conversation is now peppered with new abbreviations like HAND (have a nice day), OMG (oh my God), and my personal favourite, PITA (pain in the ass). I bet you’re LOL (laughing out loud) at that last one.

I do sympathize with the desire to save time and money and avoid the misery of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, but this lazy new “language” is in danger of making monkeys out of us all. Or should that be goats? When tennis blogs and message boards are buzzing with debate about “Roger Federer the GOAT” (greatest of all time) I know the end is nigh.

So what happened? Well, I’m tempted to blame The West Wing. On the rare occasions when I dipped into that wildly overrated showcase for smugness, sentimentality and Rob Lowe’s teeth, there was usually someone talking about POTUS. This, in case you haven’t watched the show, stands for President of the United States. It’s not a proper word, though there is a passing resemblance to the Latin adjective potens (powerful) that makes me feel slightly better disposed toward it.

To be fair, creator Aaron Sorkin was only trying to reflect the rarified world of Washington political circles, in which acronyms help to make everything sound even more important and mysterious. As JE Lighter’s article in The Atlantic suggests, POTUS was probably in play as far back as Franklin D Roosevelt. But FLOTUS (First Lady of the United States), which was bandied about during the Clinton years in reference to Hillary, is just horrible. As for the Republican Party’s cutesy nickname GOP (Grand or Good Old Party)—it really makes me want to reassess my anti-guns stance.

A galaxy of wildly implausible acronyms was part of the landscape of 60s spy yarns. Ian Fleming’s 007 novels introduced SMERSH, a Soviet counterintelligence organisation that apparently means “death to spies”. In the films, SMERSH takes a back seat to the parade of villains from the equally sinister body known as SPECTRE (SPecial Executive for Counterintelligence, Terrorism, Revenge, and Extortion).

But it’s the Bond imitators who provide some of the best pseudo or contrived acronyms from the period. The British spoof Carry on Spying has STENCH (Society for the Total Extermination of Non-Conforming Humans); the James Coburn Flint movies came up with ZOWIE (Zonal Organization for World Intelligence and Espionage); and the UNCLE franchise turns out to be nothing less than United Network Command for Law and Enforcement.

Headlines about WAGs and GOATs are one thing, but thanks largely to the moronic American Pie (1999), a far more unedifying acronym has now polluted popular culture. MILF (mother I’d like to ****) might have been mildly amusing if it had remained a throwaway line in that bafflingly popular franchise. Sadly, the infinitely more sophisticated sitcom 30 Rock has continued the joke with the hit reality show “MILF Island”, which throws super-hot moms together with horny teenage boys.

I know I should be laughing, but as acronyms become ever more puerile I’m starting to think that an organization like STENCH might be the best way forward for the preservation of the English language.

Powered by

About Susannah Straughan

  • http://jonsobel.com/ Jon Sobel

    Great article! Talking about Bond spoofs, Get Smart had a fun twist on it with KAOS and CONTROL, which actually stood for nothing but were capitalized as if they were acronyms. Uh, AFAIK.

  • http://notreallyworking.wordpress.com/ Susannah Straughan

    Thank-you. Yes, it may have been a spoof, but I suspect that KAOS and CONTROL are essential constituents of all modern government. It certainly feels that way . . .

  • http://blogcritics.org/writers/alan-kurtz Alan Kurtz

    I was taken aback by your first clause in ¶3, “Acronyms have only been around since 1943.”

    Surely, I thought, that cannot be true. Having looked into the matter, I now realize what you meant, although that’s not what you wrote. Acronyms have been around since antiquity, but have only been called that since 1943 when David Davis of Bell Laboratories coined the term.

    Forerunner acronyms include AM/PM to designate before/after noon, BC/AD to signify before and after Christ, and AC/DC to denote types of electrical current. Examples from the early 20th century include NAACP to shorten the mouthful National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (founded 1909) and BBC for British Broadcasting Corporation (launched in 1927).

    More recently, corporations have contrived acronyms to change their image. Thus Kentucky Fried Chicken became KFC to disguise the “fried” part of its name once the trans fats used in shortenings for deep-frying became associated with an elevated risk of coronary heart disease (CHD–another acronym).

    In the same vein, British Petroleum became BP to emphasize that it was no longer just an oil company. Too bad they didn’t get out of that foul business entirely.

    I’ll end with one my favorites, which gained currency among GIs during World War II and perfectly captures military life: SNAFU. Now there’s an acronym for the ages!

  • Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    …”ASH (Action on Smoking and Health) and PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) are examples of what I would call “A-list” acronyms”

    And, are ,also, great example of the acronym form used inaccurately. PETA would really be P.F.T.E.T.O.A and ASH would be A.O.S.A.H. which wouldn’t make them acronyms at all. Actually, I think a lot of organizations use that form improperly. I always felt that the best acronyms actually spelled out an identifiable English word that actually has something to do with their mission statement like MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving)

    Personally,though, I don’t think brevity will kill the English language…

  • http://notreallyworking.wordpress.com/ Susannah Straughan

    Alan, funny you should mention BP! While I was writing this piece it occurred to me that satirists could have a field day coming up with new acronyms to reflect the company’s current status as Public Enemy No 1. Or perhaps Jon Stewart’s already on the case . . .

    This piece wasn’t intended to be a survey of how or when acronyms evolved, because the more I looked into it the more different subclasses I discovered. Some would say that BBC and KFC are initialisms, rather than acronyms, because the individual letters are pronounced.

    I said that David Davis wanted to “formally recognise” the practice, because clearly he’s just the guy who came up with the name for something that had been around for a long time.

  • http://blogcritics.org/writers/alan-kurtz Alan Kurtz

    Susannah, I take your point about initialisms. You’re right. I guess the only genuine acronym in my previous comment is SNAFU. Apart from that, the rest of my comment is, well, SNAFU.