Home / Culture and Society / Releasing The Ripper

Releasing The Ripper

Please Share...Print this pageTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Share on StumbleUpon0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Peter Sutcliffe, the Yorkshire Ripper, killed 13 women and attacked five others after claiming to have heard voices ordering him to kill prostitutes. In 1981 he was sentenced to a minimum of 30 years in prison and was placed in Broadmoor Hospital, a prison for the criminally insane, after a diagnosis of schizophrenia.

This week his lawyers, armed with the ringing endorsement from the hospital doctors that Sutcliffe is fit to be freed from Broadmoor and 'is effectively cured as long as he never stops taking his medication,' won a ruling from a high court judge that a hearing should be held to set the length of time he should serve before being eligible for parole.

The decision leads us to an uncomfortable appraisal of just what we expect from our prison system.

When a judge sentences a member of society who break the law of the land to be jailed, is it as punishment, in order to be rehabilitated or just as a place to send them to remove them from society for a length of time?

Is the 15 to 30 years of a life sentence the amount of time a judge considers long enough for a criminal to "repay his debt to society' or is the thinking that this is the amount of time that a certain prisoner would take until he is suitably ready to rejoin society and not be a liability?"

If you see prison as a punishment or a rehabilitation centre, then at some point we are going to face the same decisions as we do now with Peter Sutcliffe who has almost served the minimum period and who doctors say is 'cured' of the illness that made him a serial killer.

If we see prisons as a place to hold the unsavoury members of society until they are deemed fit to rejoin the rest of us, then we still face the same problems when the time imposed is up.

There are advocates of restoring the death penalty and i would strongly suggest that if there were a referendum on the subject in Britain, hanging would be quickly restored to the list of possible punishments which explains why we would never be given the opportunity to vote on it.

As two thirds of prisoners reoffend once released, we are blatantly not rehabilitating prisoners correctly or enough. The punishment is obviously not severe enough to act as a deterrent and it shows we can only remove them for a short time but at some point we have to cross our fingers and put them back into the mix again.

I don't know a solution but i am very uncomfortable with the idea of releasing a man anytime soon who is only a missed dose of medication away from returning to his old murderous ways.

Powered by

About Lucyp

  • punishment not rehab

    A prison sentence is a punishement, not rehabilitation. People are responsible for their actions, regardless of any “medical” problems they may have. If someone violates the law, he must be punished for it. That’s the reason the death penalty exists: to punish people for comitting very serious and violent crimes. Deterance is only a side effect- a good one, of a side effect nonetheless.