Yemeni Man Says He Was Kidnapped And Detained At CIA 'Black Sites'

Mohamed Farag Bashmilah alleges that he was kidnapped and imprisoned for 19 months without trial by the CIA and cooperating governments. He was later released without trial or charges, and without any explanation for his abduction by anyone. Bashmilah says his disappearance caused such grief within his family that his wife had to be hospitalized for a time. His father also passed away while he was 'disappeared' and he remains heartbroken that his father died never knowing whether he was still alive.

Mohamed says he was tortured by the Jordanian government and the Yemeni Government, then handed over to a CIA rendition team who flew him to Afghanistan where he endured more humiliation and "torture." Mohamed is calling for a "truth commission" to look into the treatment of military detainees and thinks Americans have a right to know what happened to people like him. He further believes that those who broke American laws in the name of security should be prosecuted and held accountable.

First of all, If his story is true (and I think it probably is) I'm genuinely sorry he went through that. His father's passing while he was detained is truly a tragedy and I cannot begin to imagine how difficult that continues to be for him. Having said that, I believe the rendition/interrogation program under the Bush administration was and remains necessary even if President Obama is foolishly dismantling parts of it. We are at war, and in war there are always mistakes, and Mohamed appears to be one of them — maybe.

I don't know why he was picked up by the CIA, but I'm sure they had a legitimate reason. There's a great deal about Mohamed Farag Bashmilah (like possible aliases) that we don't know and probably will never know which formed the basis of his rendition.

I'm sure the folks at The Huffington Post get all misty eyed thinking about the poor people we rendered to so-called "black sites," but I don't. If the CIA had reason to believe that Mr. Bashmilah had information crucial to keeping America safe then whatever, and I do mean whatever, was done to him was justified.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Phillip Winn

    Feb 19, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    I'm amazed at your faith that the CIA couldn't possibly have made a mistake. I imagine you might feel differently if you were picked up and held for 19 months on the basis of faulty intelligence or a grudge by someone in, for example, the Yemeni government.

    Word to the wise: never travel outside the U.S.! After all, beyond our borders, I guess you have no rights, right?

  • 2 - Alex

    Feb 20, 2009 at 12:22 am

    essentially your argument is we should detain people however long we feel like it and let them go when we feel like it and torture them whenever we feel like it because we are the United States.

  • 3 - Chris Jones

    Feb 20, 2009 at 12:54 am

    Phillip,

    The fact that he's a free man today suggests that the CIA did make a mistake. They had reason to believe he knew certain things that it turned out he did not.

    My larger point is that because we make a mistake once in a while, doesn't mean we shouldn't keep trying.

    Other people who were picked up and dealt with in a similar manner we now know DID have vital information that we were able to use.

    And yes, once I leave the United States I don't have the same rights.

    Did you know that after 9/11 Britain passed a law allowing them to arrest any person (including British citizens) and hold them for up to 42 days without charges or even explanation?

    Where's the outcry about that? It only matters when big, bad, evil America does something, right? The Brits are right to have that law, because they must protect their people just like we must protect ours.

  • 4 - Dr Dreadful

    Feb 20, 2009 at 1:19 am

    Did you know that after 9/11 Britain passed a law allowing them to arrest any person (including British citizens) and hold them for up to 42 days without charges or even explanation?

    No, Chris - the law was never passed. It took seven years after 9/11 for the bill to even be introduced into Parliament, and the government abandoned the 42-day provision after it was voted down by the House of Lords.

    And there was plenty of outcry about it, believe you me. Just about everyone who knew shit about the subject thought it was a terrible idea - including a couple of retired spy chiefs, the Director of Public Prosecutions and several former cabinet ministers with a justice portfolio.

  • 5 - Dr Dreadful

    Feb 20, 2009 at 1:39 am

    And I'd be interested to see a citation for your claim that "the average Yemeni policeman routinely tortures people to death".

    I'm not saying that the Yemeni police force should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize any time soon, but that claim seems rather far-fetched.

  • 6 - Cindy

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:26 am

    The author says:

    I don't know...but I'm sure

    That says all there is to say about his thinking skills and his opinions.


  • 7 - Jordan Richardson

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:29 am

    Chris, good to see you back! Can't wait for your next Muslim smear article or your next set of delusions principles set to music.

  • 8 - Roger Nowosielski

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:29 am

    Funny, I haven't noticed it. Did you have a productive day?

  • 9 - Cindy

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:32 am

    I don't know why he was picked up by the CIA, but I'm sure they had a legitimate reason.

    right there.

  • 10 - Roger Nowosielski

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:33 am

    Yes, I got it:

    "I don't know why he was picked up by the CIA, but I'm sure they had a legitimate reason."

    Another point to wonder about: "since it was the CIA, it goes without saying they had a legitimate reason."

  • 11 - Jordan Richardson

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:33 am

    the average Yemeni policeman routinely tortures people to death.

    The average Yemeni policeman also enjoys disco, hanging out in parks, chewing khat until the juices run, and fishing.

  • 12 - Roger Nowosielski

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:36 am

    Are you suggesting, Jordan, that they're not one-dimensional?

  • 13 - Cindy

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:39 am

    Whatever the average Yemeni policeman does. There is likely a "Chris" in Yemen writing about how, he doesn't know, but he's sure they have a good reason for doing it.

  • 14 - Roger Nowosielski

    Feb 20, 2009 at 8:42 am

    People will be people, and some of them are Chrises.

  • 15 - Cindy

    Feb 22, 2009 at 4:08 pm

    The more I try to write my article on this subject, the more I cannot comprehend the attitude of a Chris Jones or the actions of the people who have made these decisions and carried out these crimes against people.

    They are no different from medieval minds. They are barbarians. No society can advance with them as members. And there are too many of them.

  • 16 - Dr Dreadful

    Feb 22, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    I always feel I should comment here just to keep a discussion going on some subject other than Barger's latest literary fart-in-an-elevator, but I think pretty much everything's been said here.

    But please persevere with your article, Cindy. We could do with some thinking on this subject that explores more than one dimension.

  • 17 - Roger Nowosielski

    Feb 22, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    I'm surprised you had even visited that thread. You'd managed to avoid it for at least three days.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 22, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs